| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (41)

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:07PM TheyDidItFirst said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this sounds cool, but I'd rather see Amusante (that French artsy game mag) get an English language version
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know, on one hand, a lot of gaming mags have lost aa lot of their luster nowasays, examples including Gameinformer and Nintendo Power, and on the other, a lot of the announced "re-launch" magazines tend to be quite interesting...

I'm pretty much on the fence on this, IMO.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gaming is serious business.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:11PM ch3burashka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That is the most ambiguous thing I've heard today, in terms of tone: I have no clue whether or not you're joking or not.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:29PM OptimumEDGE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Holy batman robin, I think we just found Dr. Sarcasm's evil lair.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 8:02AM Benjamin Gilbert said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's as if no one in this comments section read the piece at all. They're not aiming for some lofty new gaming mag meant to compete with Game Informer and Nintendo Power (like *some* people, cough EGM Now cough). They're printing a super small initial run (2-3000 copies is REALLY small for a magazine) and printing to a subscriber base (as in not throwing away 70% of what they print like most magazines -- I shit you not, that's the actual percentage most mags trash of their own print run). They're trying something different and doing it in a classy way. As I personally know Jamin, I can attest to the fact that he's not in the slightest a pretentious guy or an unrealistic person. He, I'm sure, is well aware of the world of print publications and the potential issues one can face in creating a print magazine (especially in gaming). That being said, him and Chris Dahlen are trying something new and doing so in an intelligent way. Rather than berate them, how about we be supportive gamers and try to give them a shot?

Worst thing that happens, you don't like it. I assure you there are worse things in the world than that.

I love you all!
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 1:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait... what?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 3:22PM Rick James said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Btw, there's a kill screen coming up...
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:10PM s ls said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i hope to grab the Mag in NYC hopefully
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Only way they will make it big is if they have like 5 exclusive premiers in each issue
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully when they say highbrow they're not intending to take it in a pretentious Adbusters/New Yorker direction, because it'll fold quickly.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 9:10AM Petebot330 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I assume by highbrow they mean a magazine that speaks more to the ideas in games (like the blog Brainy Gamer) rather than their new "hands-on" with game X. I think this is exactly what's needed.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The sample pages are some of the worst looking designs I've ever seen.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:34PM Professor Lario said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I generally go here for my 'higher brow' game related content - http://www.gamespite.net

The books Parish puts together are excellent as well.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:36PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's a staaaaaarman, waiting in the sky...

He's like to come and meet us, but he thinks he'd blow our minds...
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:40PM Funkmaster General said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let the children lose it, let the children use it, and let all the children boogie.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:41PM Funkmaster General said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks pretty interesting. I like the idea, and I think that I will contribute.

Good on ya, Joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Interesting. It's a good thing they offer a PDF version (even if I HATE PDF).

Print is dead.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:49PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I hope it never dies.

I still need bathroom reading, damnit.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:52PM finnith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's to hate about PDF? Other than the fact that it's not readily editable? (which is actually an advantage in some cases)
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
That's what Tetris is for.

That's actually one of the most common uses for old Game Boys and their Tetris carts: Bathroom entertainment.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Firefox doesn't play nice with PDF's, and they're too bulky.

For example, I've got the entire Calvin and Hobbes collection in PDF. It takes way too long to open.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:59PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Darth, you bastard, I love C&H.

Where'd you... get that?

:)
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bought a PocketPC back in 2006, and it came with a disk loaded with eBooks and such. The Calvin and Hobbes collection was just a bonus.

And yes, C&H is awesome.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:32AM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
print will not die in our lifetime. and even when it does the internet will be so advanced it will just take on the design qualities of print.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 2:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. I think print will go on for another 50 years or so.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Having checked out the sample pages, I can't say I have high hopes for this publication. They did sort of go for an Adbusters look in the design department, where it changes from minimal one page to shitty and hard to read on the next. A games magazine still needs to be primarily about games, not some guy's nostalgia for the past coupled with pixel art.

On the other hand, GameSpite looks pretty neat; definitely getting a bookmark.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2009 11:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like a great mag. But I don't think there's enough intelligent folk like myself that'll keep em in buisness yo.

I hope they still have trophy hints.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:12AM AtomicPlayboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Edge has this genre pretty well covered in print, and The Escapist owns it in digital. I'll be interested to see how these folks improve upon these or differentiate from them. Please, no pseudo-intellectual pap about the post-modern profundity of Braid, ok?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:35AM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
oh im sure there'll be plenty of that
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait to read hipsters discussing WHY DO WE PLAY GAMES and other such nonsense.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:53AM Fuzunga said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One of my favorite gaming mags was also the shortest lived. It was called Surge: The Pulse of Gaming. It's so obscure, in fact, that I can find nothing about it on the internet. The only thing that proves its existence are the two or three issues I have. I don't even know how many issues were made.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 1:09AM Jack Spicer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm just going to get a subscription to Edge.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 1:23AM Lectoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm still waiting for "Retro Gamer" to come over to the states. A 13 issue (1 year) subscription shipped to the US from the UK costs over $130.

http://www.retrogamer.net/
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 2:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they will publish only two issues before they realise you can't expect cheese and wine readers from an industry that's most popular titles usually involve a gun, killing people, jumping on things and fps perspectives and then go back to a fun easy reading style magazine to avoid bankruptcy. i'm not saying we gamers are unintelligent but the vast majority of mainstream casual gamers are.sorry if my english is bad, its a hard language to learn. and me still doesn't does it right, do me?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 8:12AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just kind of like how you decide to generalize an entire group of people simply because they like one genre of gaming.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i mentioned at the very least 3 of the most popular genre's.should i have included sports too?
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 3:47AM CBXweb said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought Next Generation magazine was the high brow magazine. But that was from years ago. While all my friends were looking at crap reviews from Scary Larry giving Bongo's Revenge 2.5 lazy guys, I was reading articles about Net Yaroze.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 11:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm all for a more "highbrow" gaming mag but those preview pages were just awful.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 12:01PM cbarrentos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is less of a magazine, and more of an independent 'zine.

i like it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 3rd 2009 6:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well first of all, I am a guy who loves magazine, nat geo adventure, nat geo, economist, esquire, new yorker, and perhaps this coming year kill screen. I liked the sample pages, defintly something I'll read.We need more magazine like that, and more sites like joystiq.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW