| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (75)

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:32PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I miss the days of "limited continues" and "lives".
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:36PM Bobthebuilder said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I thought you couldn't die anyways?
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:40PM RageOverdose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but a lot of today's modern games don't fit that very well.

There are some tough challenges, but they aren't forced down your throat. Take any of the highest difficulties of your action game, and they require fast aim, smart movement, and some luck in order to get through.

Yet, on the same token, we don't get those challenging puzzles and tasks we used to. I miss the platforming days before the last generation spawned. Those games provided a fun challenge or two.

Achievements kind of fill this gap, on occasions, but sometimes they can be way ridiculous or just plain simple.

But, I wouldn't mind a game with lives and/or continues again in this generation. The only game that comes to mind at the moment is Devil May Cry 4. I'm sure there are more, I just, don't have them sadly. =(
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:58PM Sly C said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
the thing is, back in the day, there were ALWAYS patterns, so anyone could get through if they got the pattern down. now, there are rarely ever patterns (except platformers obviously) because of AI that thinks for itself. in veteran on COD, if we had limited lives, pretty much no one would make it through to the end on their own because of the AI that's never in the exact same place or does the same thing, so getting all the way through would require some SERIOUS luck.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:59PM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think it still goes both ways. Yea a challenge is great, and gives you a sense of accomplishment, but it also sucks beating your head against the same part of a game for hours making no progress. I hate it when games make me feel like I'm wasting my time.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 7:00PM BIGGEN said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
so you miss the days of battling through a game, getting to a certain point, using all your lives and continues, and having to start completely over at the beginning, finally getting to that same point again, using all your lives and continues, and having to start completely over at the beginning again...i blame ninja gaiden and rygar on the NES for this rant.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 8:59PM andsoitgoes said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Let there be difficulty levels.

I'm not a great gamer, when I play a game I want to play it through and enjoy it.

I suck at CoD games and on the harder difficulties, I wanted to take my controller and throw it through a window.

I don't want to feel that way when I play a game.

Achievements are fantastic so let those be big numbers for getting through on the harder difficulties, but don't forget that there are casual and aging gamers that still want to play games like this, which are appealing to the casual and hardcore market.

I played through the first ME more times than I'd like to admit, but if it was a punshing difficulty from the get-go, I don't know if I'd have enjoyed it as much.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2009 11:57AM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dear Mass Effect, please fix the autosave system, OR add an autosave button. Sometimes I go hours without remembering to save which takes like 4 seconds to do, but honestly, please just autosave more regularly, like after every battle?
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like challenge and sophistication. I've been playing mario and luigi 3 and that game not only tells you how to do everything, but tells you about 4 times before they even let you try it. It's making the game a total snoozefest.

So bring on the challenge in ME2!
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:39PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mario & Luigi Bowser's Story on the DS? I just bought it but haven't played it too much, but the early going they definitely beat you over the head with how to play. I remember from 2 that once you get deeper into it the battles get pretty cool, I really like the combat mechanics. The writing in those games is hilarious.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah the latest DS one. It apparently doesn't change ever, cause i'm 10 hours in and everytime I do something new they make sure I understand what to do...to the point of aggravation.

The game itself is really easy too, I don't think I've even lost 1 brother in battle yet let alone a complete game over.

I don't expect mass effect 2 to be "hard", but if it's even a little bit of a challenge then I will be satisfied.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:50PM Bubbameister33 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are probably little kids who play the game too so it's there to help them out.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:05PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even so you should have the option to turn them off.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No argument there. Shit is faaaar too easy these days.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:01PM Granger said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Only if you remember your Dulcolax, otherwise it can quite literally be a pain in the ass.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No complaints here. Everything about this game looks better than the first.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:49PM hyamzy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh my, voted down for posting, you Joystiqer's really have lost it...
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Especially since my comment volume had been dropping before the downvotes...

Meh, don't really care. I'm still going to keep posting.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You haven't heard about the 'Anti-Bradwart Force'?
Irony at its best :)

Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:19PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Mass Effect 1 was already good and yes this one looks even better.

It still won't be better than Red Dead Redemption but it's a solid GOTY runner-up contender.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:25PM ytilanigiroon said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I know I'm feeding the trolls, but; if you're supposed to be "anti-whatever" I'd assume you wouldn't post in the same thread, or agree with the OP...

Internet, have you los' yo' damn mind?
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:40PM MystileArmor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You all need a hobby... I heard playing video games is a cool one these days.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 7:55PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Our early attempts at a thwarting the trolls went through several preparations. Preparations A through G were a complete failure. But now, ladies and gentlemen, we finally have a working method to annoy them, which we shall call... Preparation H.

And yes Darth, on the whole Preparation H feels good.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 8:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'm assuming this Filthy guy said something relevant? All I'm getting is "Derp de derp derp derp de derpderp."...I don't know why ;)
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 8:19PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well Darth I'm not all that familar with Javascript, otherwise I'd try to make a script to auto level your hearts. One problem is that the voting comes before the user ID, so I can't just modify the kill filter to replace the end action (comment replacement) with the up-vote action.

Even worse, I'd have to also check to see if the comment had two hearts or less. If it auto up votes when you're already at two hearts, that wouldn't really be all that fair to the others.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 8:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, don't bother. I'm hoping it'll stop eventually.

Especially since it's almost all one guy running a bunch of sockpuppet accounts.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 8:40PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Just because I hate the guy and think he needs to stop posting every waking minute of his life doesn't mean I can't agree with him on a subject. It just means I vote him down whenever I see him.

I do think it's hilarious how he thinks we're all one person, though. The fact that more than one person hates him is just completely unfathomable to him.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 9:45PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That hardly seems like a reasonable excuse to hate somebody. This isn't a popularity contest, there's really no reason to downvote somebody just because you don't like them.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 11:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is not helping that every time it happens, someone stops to comment on it. All you are doing is encouraging. Ignore it, and move on with your lives.
Reply

Posted: Dec 5th 2009 1:10AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dreaded Fear

The hypocrisy is fucking palpable. Good job.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:37PM krash411 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This sounds great. I just hope this isn't industry speak for "we've made a really short game, so it's gonna be really difficult to make a longer playing experience.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:43PM stubby boardman said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It was recently announced that the game will be split onto two DVDs so I wouldn't worry about that
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:59PM TacoHell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If Dragon Age is any indication, I highly doubt it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:40PM stubby boardman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't like how Call of Duty or Gears use the regenerating health system. It doesn't make any sense and it neglects to punish sloppy play. At least it makes sense in Halo, given the time setting and the type of soldier you are. But it was cooler in Halo 1 when you had limited health with a replenishing shield.

The last game I can think of that really challenged me was Braid
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:07PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There aren't many health systems that do make sense. How can you measure how healthy you are with just one number?
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:31PM ytilanigiroon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If anything the system that Halo, et al, uses is the most realistic. People try to quantify how healthy they are in sports all the time, "I'm about 80% good to go"... But really, health in some sort of combat situation would be more binary: "I can kill everyone and get the hell out of here," or "dead."
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 7:54PM finnith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Having regenerating health makes games more accessible, it may be rewarding sloppy playing but that's what keeping the games industry afloat, i.e. I don't think sales would be as high if games were as difficult as before.

Additionally, why all this talk about "realism". It sure as hell isn't realistic for one person to blow through an entire base or be able to carry an entire army's worth of guns, ammo and other equipment while doing so, so I think we can suspend our disbelief a bit more.

I know I probably wouldn't be playing games as much if they were as difficult as they were before, I'm just not that good a gamer. Of course there's a limit to how easy a game should be.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 8:13PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ytilanigiroon

That's sports. They aren't judging how much life they have left, they aren't saying they're 80% alive. At worst, they're at 0 and they have to sit out, which is far from dying. I know army squads rate their combat effectiveness, but that's for the whole group, and takes a lot of other things into account beyond their individual wellness.

@finnith

Arguing the realism of events within these games is missing point. Players still like to feel like they're actually there, and more realistic combat and health systems can go a long way to augmenting the immersion. Also, none of the games he mentioned allow you to carry an entire arsenal, so that point is moot.



Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:41PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dear god this game is going to be the most sublime crack. I just peed myself thinking about it. Rare nowadays that I'll sit down for 3, 4, or 5 hour play sessions but I'm sure I will with this.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:43PM RageOverdose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder what the challenge will be, besides bumping up enemy stats and maybe tactics AI.

It can be kinda hard to make a shooter-style game hard without just making the enemies tougher than you. But then, if there's enough enemy variety and they act pretty smart, then that's not really a complaint for me.

ME2, don't disappoint me!

Who am I kidding? Hard or easy, I'll still love this damn game.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 7:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In Soviet Russia, damn game loves you!
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This makes me so happy.

Infinity Ward, Epic, and Bungie can go fuck themselves.

BRB, gonna go play some Modern Warfare 2, Gears of War, and Halo 3. :P

(p.s. Dragon Age made me do something I hadn't done in years. Actually draw a diagram on a piece of paper for a puzzle in the game. That felt so good.)
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:45PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
lol, this game is going to be hated
"its too hard", they will cry, "Give me a fun game" they will shout, their calls will be heard and this game will flop
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The words 'BioWare' and 'flop' do not go in the same sentence...
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:53PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
The words 'BioWare' and 'Mainstream' do not go in the same sentence...
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:54PM BrianH said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
dude, none of your comments that i've read so far make sense.

Bioware makes games that are very accessible to any gamer.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The multi-million selling Baldurs Gate, KotOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect and (hopefully) Dragon Age disagree with you.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:56PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
barely two million
and according to the GTA thread that means it aint so great
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 6:08PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't Bioware make that Sonic RPG that didn't do so well? Yeeeeaaaa.
Reply

Posted: Dec 4th 2009 5:49PM anonymack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Captain

I'm all for upping the challenge in games, but I don't miss the limited lives and continues. You can make a game hard without making you reset your progress if you mess up too often. I think challenge should be in gameplay, not in game mechanic. Set lives doesn't make playing the actual game harder, it just makes it harder to progress in it. Specifically in DMC4, set continues didn't make Bosses harder, it just made you resent them more.

Tl;dr I can't wait for Mass Effect 2 =D. This and God of War 3 are my must-haves for 2010.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW