| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:25PM Kamaka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Less money for Activision = Win.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 6:47PM dartmerc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hate Darth for superficial reasons too!
But also agree.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
With the relatively low sales of this game, I doubt Activision cares too much about losing it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:43PM Kamaka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Still outsold Tony Hawk Ride i'm sure. lol.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, it did, but it's not helping EA's financial situation any.

Activision can afford a lot of bombs, thanks to Call of Duty. EA isn't on such secure ground.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:01PM kevlar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Eff?
EA puts out sports titles every year, where they take the same game, tweak them, fix the rosters and squirt out a new nugget... And continue to buy them.
That's saying nothing of their Harry Potter and The Sims franchises.

I'd put EA in a better position than Activision any day.

Besides, the way Activision continues to "exploit" their franchises, they're going to see a lot of them die young and early. I mean... everyone I know prefers Rock Band over Guitar Hero... Skate over Tony Hawk.... etc. (Notice a pattern?)

The ONLY thing Activision has left, really is Call of Duty. If it weren't for the unexpected success of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, they might not even have that.

Seriously. Take a good hard look at Activision's catalog, and track record... then we'll see how many bombs Activision can afford.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Seen EA's latest financial reports? Notice all the red?

Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:20PM Octillus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The real reason activision has nothing to worry about is Blizzard. They cash millions every month.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:37PM s ls said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
joystiq can please ban these dumb fuck spamming his site already?
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:42PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just switched over to a new job that runs agile this year. It's awesome.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:01PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree completely, and in some ways agile development should be extremely well suited to producing games, where the requirements are by definition extremely fluid, and expected to change from week to week.

On the other hand, a lot of game development is probably not well-suited to test-driven development, because automated testing is not great at catching what's working and not working in a game (except for extreme boundary cases, like hard crashes).

Unfortunately, the excerpts don't provide any detail in terms of how they applied Scrum and what worked. I may pick up the full article if it has more information.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:23PM sicsided said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lots of good information in the article. After running Scrum for most of it, they switched back to waterfall near the end of production. Most of the postmortem deals with integrating thirdparty software to speed up development, but yeah, it kinda didn't also.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:45PM whnunlife said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Solace, why don't you stop bitching, if i was spamming, would I even make a comment pertaining to the original post?
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Posting any consistent link as a signature is considered spamming. There's a reason for the URL option on the profile.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:10PM Ghen said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree with Darth. and I hate Darth for superficial reasons.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 3:16PM whnunlife said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Yeah, I don't think I like Darth either now. We had a good thing going to ;)
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 11:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply fail...
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 4:41PM s ls said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
we dont give a fuck about your shitty site take is somewhere else
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 4:50PM whnunlife said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Maybe not. But maybe your girl friend cares.

Just saying
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 5:31PM 33PercentGod said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I know it's the most idiotic thing,but I hate the name Gamasutra so much. Everytime I read it I think in my head "you mean Kamasutra".
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 6:22PM BustedChain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm playing through Brutal Legend and it rather entertaining. It is not a hard game by any stretch of the imagination, but the combination of dialog, some of the scenes, and the gameplay is pretty fun. The "sidequests" have a sort of half-baked feel to them, but they aren't the main part of the game anyway.

If you find a cheap copy of Burtal Legend, get it. I got mine on sale during Black Friday Amazon deals and I had another $20 off, so I paid about $15 for it brand new. I plan on selling it when I beat the game and making a profit for once.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 6:35PM Maulok said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since seeing the video, I can't help but to read this game's title with the pronunciation used by Yatzee in his Zero Punctuation review every time I read it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 11th 2009 9:41PM Tye El Czar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you know that Scrum sounds a lot like S.C.U.M.M.? SCUMM was the engine used for most of Lucasarts' adventure games back in the day. Coincidence?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW