| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (210)

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:07PM Fj2036 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
looks cool, wish they would have showed more though
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:22PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Does it? Seems like a pretty normal, non-exciting cut scene.

How will this game end well? We already know the Spartans get wiped, right?
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:27PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
What did you expect... they used all the funds they made off ODST to make the trailer.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:45PM Maxx the Slasher said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Glorious Indifference:

Read the novels, specifically First Strike and Ghosts of Onyx. There are several a handful, even after Halo 3 ends. A mix of Spartan II's and some Spartan III's.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 1:37AM sorensilk said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Does that image say Falls 2010? Are there multiple Falls now? How many summers do we have?
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 2:00AM Prinnywithascarf said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@sorensilk: I wish I could downvote you more than once for being twice an idiot.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 4:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@sorensilk: That's funny but I think it say Falls 2010 because Reach falls and it's coming out in Fall, so it's a play on words, but I don't know.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 10:50AM tubb311 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
anyone else notice they said "the six of us"?

i;m hoping they're making a six player co-op campaign. that would be pretty sweet.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 11:37AM SirUrza said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah photo realism does look pretty cool... but didn't people say Halo had a special style and that's why Halo 3 wasn't photo realistic?
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
did anyone notice the Halo 1 pistol being revealed? Its at the 0:44 sec mark on the hip of the Spartan getting out of the Warthog.
Reply

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 3:58AM hey buddy said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
That looks pretty much how Halo has always looked. Your milage will vary: some will think "that looked pretty cool," while I thought it looked pedestrian and mundane. I just can't get in to Halo anymore. And that music was *isht* too. Join us in the 2000s, Bungie. Create a new IP if you have it in you.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:07PM SpaceFox said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Except it's not gameplay....
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:09PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I would hope not though. It looked like that footage was done using the outdated Halo 3 engine.

Color me unimpressed for a title that's scheduled to arrive in less than a year.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If you were watching through a live stream, of course it's going to look bad. Watch it in 1080p when it hits XBLM tonight, then say that again.

To clarify, Reach is an ALL NEW engine (unlike a certain other title beginning with Modern and ending with 2).
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I wanted to see what they were doing when it came to GAMEPLAY.

Most of the trailers for the VGAs sucked anyways.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:17PM Deschain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Watched it in 1080p on TV. Still not impressed. Not saying it's bad though. Still, I was expecting some gameplay so I'm in a bad mood to begin with. It almost seems like Bungie thinks people will still get excited just based off someone saying "New halo game". I'm passed that, sorry. I want some gameplay.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dropship dude asks, "What can we expect to see in this preview on the 12th?"
A video from Halo: Reach's opening cinematic.

That's from the 12.04.09 Weekly Update. it's been out there a while now.

Bungie doesn't show gameplay, I suspect mainly because of the Halo 2 fiasco.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:20PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
what fiasco? The E3 03 level that was scrapped for a new one?
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, not so much a fiasco, but there was a lot of bitching because that was cut from the final game (along with Forerunner Tank, Covenant Ship, and two other levels, if I remember right.)
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Funny that the best level in Halo 2, was never released.

(Yes, I know they remade it and took any atmosphere that the Halo 2 E3 Trailer had)
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:29PM MrFrench said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Darth

The only thing is this "new" engine for Reach still won't be as good looking as the "old" engine for MW. Maybe Reach will actually be in 720p? I'm not holding my breath for 60 fps though..
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Halo 3 is 60 FPS...and unlike the IW engine, has a record draw-distance, uses dual frame-buffers, and has a much better lighting engine.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:32PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Halo 3 runs at 30 fps, and still didn't look as good as COD4.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:35PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
CoD4 looked like shit, to be honest. It only looked semi-decent in 1080P. SD looked terrible.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I do give IW props for making MW2 look a hell of a lot better than MW 1. Not Uncharted or Killzone (or, evidentally Reach) quality, but pretty damn good.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:37PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I remember in 2007, the general consensus was COD4 looked much better than Halo 3.

And it is using an outdated engine, and Halo 3 was using a new engine.... funny how that works.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
What ever makes you have a nerdgasm, I suppose. Hope IW pays you well.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:42PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I hope Bungie pays you well since you are going around saying that the Halo story is better than Half life.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:00PM Deschain said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
that's cute, a Bungie fanboy VS an Infinity Ward fanboy

This should be on ppv.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:05PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Nope, I hate Infinity Ward, but I love their games.

But Brad's debate skills are at a 3rd grade level, so he automatically goes into labeling mode.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:08PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I haven't laughed this hard in minutes.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:14PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Coming from the idiot who claims he has 'stalkers'?

You're such an arrogant jackass.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:16PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
You continue to make these assumptions about me?

You have the debating skills of Bill O'reilly (YOU liberal, communisty, blah blah, you said this, you said that, etc...)

How about we focus on the topic for a change? Oh, you know you are wrong so you need to change the argument.



Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:28PM Scratchcard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Half-life's story is a convoluted mess. The delivery was beautifully executed though.

I still love Halo's extended universe as much as SW
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:29PM SpaceFox said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
HEY HEY! No arguing on my comment guys. You're killing my inbox. =P
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:31PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@SpaceFox
We are killing your what??? What are you trying to say?
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 12:37AM CaramelZappa said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@mr french

"The only thing is this "new" engine for Reach still won't be as good looking as the "old" engine for MW. Maybe Reach will actually be in 720p? I'm not holding my breath for 60 fps though.."

Alright, if you're going to say the MW engine is good and the Halo one is bad, don't bring up resolution. MW2 still only runs at 1024 x 600. Meanwhile Halo 3 runs at 1152x640, which still isn't 720p, but a helluv a lot more pixels.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 11:31AM Chibi Chaingun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Gameplay" in this (and many other) cases is a pretty universal lose term for saying that it's in-game graphics, realtime during gameplay, irregardless that it's a cutscene. I'm surprised a bunch of commenters on a gaming blog aren't privy to that by now.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
it looked awesome. i was hoping for some gameplay footage but it doesn't really matter.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:02PM sigma8 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Does it? I don't have a 360--you may think that makes me anti-360, and maybe you're right--but what it also does, is it makes me jealous of good games that I can't play...and I will tell you right now that the DLC for GTA4 looked more compelling than this trailer.

I mean, a shot of some choppers and a couple Spartans mostly standing around suffices as amazing these days? And THAT is a female? You are trying to tell me that Orlando Bloom on helium with black hair dye is a woman?
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:17PM jynxycat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What exactly was awesome about that?

A couple dudes walking around and talking up the Spartans. Then they fly away. That's like an intro video to an early level.

Color me not impressed.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 11:24PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@jynxycat

You underestimate how many Halo fanboys there are. Bungie could shit on them, and they would consider it impressive.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 11:03AM Chibi Chaingun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Demonam:

Looking through the comments, I can't understand why you are here. You obviously aren't a fan of Halo and you're complaining about Halo fans commenting in a Halo thread. Then just GTFO.
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 12:16PM Konrad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is par for the course with Bungie. The first trailer has always been a cinematic designed to get you interested in the game and give you a vague idea about the story. Gameplay stuff comes later.

Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:08PM Signature said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I give this trailer a 4/10
Reply

Posted: Dec 13th 2009 5:34AM a dark day said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
dont you know that ratings dont matter?
Reply

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 6:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I give you're rating a 7/10
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:10PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Yay......

Not. Just another crappy Halo game. These SAME games can only be played so many times.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Then why are you commenting in this thread?
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2009 10:19PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"These SAME games"
What is that supposed to mean? Either that's terrible grammar or a terrible insult
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW