| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 11:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope they add more realism, but not to the point where it's just ArmA.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 3:11PM harryboze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this game should be relive again
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 11:47AM quackdocter said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
they are going into the future where they have time machines to go into the past!
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 11:47AM Shadowbender said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I was really impressed with the PSP version of Ghost Recon: AW 2. However, Ubisoft really needs to bring something ORIGINAL to its franchise. At this point in the video game industry, I don't know if I can stand another generic shooter. But I can already see they're bringing something unique to GR. I always wanted a futuristic Call of Duty, but Ghost Recon is fine with me. Now they need to develop an outstanding game, and, oh--MARKET THE PRODUCT.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2009 12:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When I saw the title I immediately thought CoD: Future Combat
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2010 4:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ummm ever heard of H.A.W.X.? pretty original if you ask me...
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 11:58AM BoBsS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked GRAW 2's singleplayer.

But the multiplayer felt buggy and not tactile. It seemed like my character's actions were always a second or two behind my commands.

I suppose its more realistic but it wasn't a pleasure playing online multiplayer. I did enjoy playing coop games like enemy elimination and etc.

Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 12:02PM GordoJones88 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, is it a soldier from the future or are they sending a soldier to the future? Why not just wait.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 12:24PM Manny Fleurmond said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Trying to get a leg up on Modern Warfare, perhaps?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 12:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lame name is lame. I hated how the characters seemed to just float/glide over the surface in GRAW 2, especially in multiplayer. Felt like characters had no weight, was weird.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 12:39PM Bubbameister33 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The future Conan?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:01PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
..............Are we going through a copy MW phase?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:37PM TheyDidItFirst said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What are you blithering about?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 2:54PM Inquisitor Glokta said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
GRAW 2006
COD4 2007

Ghost did modern first.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 4:28PM Commander Corn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
When did it become cool to hate MW2? I remember back when the put the first teaser trailer up this whole site was in huge love with this game, now everyone hates it. Same with Guitar Hero. Someone please elaborate what's up with these "hate phases"
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 5:02PM emirabal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was thisnking about it, i thought GRAW was always: (Excuse the play on words) set in modern times, not based off of old wars.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 5:10PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wasn't hating on MW or GRAW, and I know GRAW did it first, I was more amused by the subtitle of 'future soldier', pointing out that since MW went 'modern', its been quite the ideal basis to follow (Medal of Honour) I suspect maybe GRAW is looking for a similar atmosphere, just less explosions and more stealth as always. Who knows. I'd buy it anyway, I love stealth and have yet to miss a Ghost Recon or Socom.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:04PM Katana Master said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Must every game be compared to MW2?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:31PM MGTrey said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But the sequel to Monkey Wranglers was such a classic! All games must be compared to that indispensable game; it is truly the ultimate litmus test of quality.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 3:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is better than most shooters out there, so yes.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 5:12PM Spunky Monkey 190906 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why not, I see MW as a technical standpoint, okay, the last one may not have been as great as the first, but when Halo came out, we were comparing games to it for years, and all in good reasoning, it set a bar to reach and others had to surpass it or reach it, we expected no less. MW just went and did that again.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:18PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I remember those wonderful days.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:30PM Scratchcard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_Knight_Adventures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubsy_the_Bobcat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_the_Acrobat

Are you talking about the 80s? Because most of the 90s to me was an assload of furred mascots due to the trend set by Sonic.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:35PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I remember the PS2 days quite well. Back when everything was WWII. I even remember the days before that, when most shooters had to have demons/hell or in rare case aliens who looked like demons.

I can't ever really think of a time when a shooting game had an amazing story that was easy to follow. I can think of plenty of times when shooting games weren't the first to do something, but they were just plain anyways.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 1:41PM Tac Error said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I remember when Ghost Recon actually meant good tactical gameplay back in 2001 with plenty of mods and downloadable missions. Now it's an average third-person shooter that's no better than a slightly more realistic Call of Duty.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 2:03PM jhoff80 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed, the PC Ghost Recon 1 and 2 were when the game was at its best, before all of this "Advanced Warfighter" crap.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 4:41PM coolbho3000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Soon from Ubisoft: Ghost Recon: Future Solder vs Ghost Recon: Future Demoman.

Fight!
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 7:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Everyone already knew Soldier was going to win. Demoman is for losers, Soldier for life!
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 3:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wha?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2009 7:14PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I loved the GRAW games just the way they were. I would like regenerating health however. Just a thought.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2009 1:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love how these future dates are becoming closer and closer to the actual date.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2010 12:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the reason that the dates are moving ever closer is simply because the real world tech is catching up to what the games are claiming the military will be using in just a few months in most cases...and almost all the gear from graw 1 and 2 is real...the future warrior system is being tested in the field by a select few elite ranger units(like most weapons and technological systems used by the military in the past)...just about the only i\thing i can think of thats in graw 1 oe 2 thats still being developed is the mr-c because of the issues theyre having with the propelant9cant remember the proper spelling) caps...its slated for a 2015 militaryy test and a 2020 civilian issue date...i promise all you other gun freaks out there thats when you can get your hands on a mr-c...better have a assload of cash for the expesive as balls ammo though...and theres also the xm8 from h&k...it was cancelled a few years ago because the used rubber for the foregrip and it kept melting under combat fire tests...yet instead of just making them ballistic plastic like the rest of the gun(not my choice of materials) the army told h&k to cancel...now you rich bitches get your hands on one because of ebay and we dont...RICH BASTARDS!!!!
Reply

Posted: Dec 21st 2009 12:39PM zenaxe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think they should call it: Call of Crysis: Modern Battlefield of Honor. That would be catchy.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW