| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (103)

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:39PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Well, now that everyone and their dog has a Wii, what will be the fad for the next decade?
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:43PM Shadowbender said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
VITALITY SENSOR. THE NEW DECADE'S PHENOMENON!
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Sad thing is, you're probably right.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:46PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Indeed, it's sad. I'm still hoping for a Matrix styled gaming experience, but maybe I'm thinking a little too far ahead.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Something that doesn't suck hopefully.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 2:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Prinny plushies, dood.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 1:28AM I AM IRONHIDE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, it's probably gonna be Guitar Hero 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 2:13AM Scratchcard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You're all wrong. It's gonna be skeletons dressed up as pilots in Pearl Jam music videos.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 3:09AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Technically its not a new decade since there was never a year zero the first decade ever would've gone year 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10: this decade will go as 2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010, the next decade will start with 2011
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 3:42AM BrianH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
we've been through this, there was a year 0, this is a new decade
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 8:57AM slimshady said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
No there was no "year zero": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_zero

Jesus was born in year 1 AD, the before that year was 1 BC.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:19AM mrmobius said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually Jesus was more likely born in 4 or 5 BC. Just saying.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:31AM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, i had heard Christ was born in 6 BC, but that's just an inaccuracy of the original dating system.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Why is Mr. Green downvoted? He's right.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:58PM dogmaticatheist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There are a few possible dates for the birth of Jesus because the gospels seem to disagree as to when he was actually born.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 8:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I got 3


Both for my dog and cat.
Reply

Posted: Jan 2nd 2010 11:47AM eat it said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
ok look, there was no year 0.

but no one cares, because there was a year 2000.

when we mention the 80's we don't talk about 81-90. we talk about 80-89 because it's easier and makes sense and isn't loosely based around some dude's birthday 2000 and some years ago.

we are now in the '10s because it is the year 2010. It is the new decade, live with it you anal bastard.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:41PM Rhamsey said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How is the ds not on top?
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:00AM Kenoji said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Simple. We're not Japan.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:07AM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Kenoji
I think this time you're allowed to say "FIRST".
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:25AM ch3burashka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*sex joke here*
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, Kenoji deserves it!

Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 1:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this list just confirms what ive always already known, there is more mom's than there is gamers....
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:43PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
At least Uncharted 2 made 18. Considering how popular the Wii is, and it's sold 2x as much as the PS3, it's good to Naughty Dog getting some recognition.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:45PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So we have the Wii on the list, the PS3 on the list...one has to wonder where the Xbox 360 is.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3 probably made it because of the huge Slim demand. And does that include that spectacular bundle they had for Black Friday?
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:49PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*spectacular BUNDLES
Unlike Microsoft, who offered just the family pack.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:50PM Rhamsey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Darth I could have sworn the 360 beat the PS3 for the month of November, and the slim hasn't been out that long.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It did beat ps3 last month, by about 100k in America. I also believe they beat them over the whole year, but I'm not positive about that.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Slim's been in the upper part of the Amazon sales charts since it launched in September.

Don't forget, NPD doesn't include Wal-Mart (who had the great TDK Infamous/Arkham bundle) or Amazon sales.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
As for yearly sales, it's going to be damn close. Microsoft probably had a lead throughout most of the year, but given the high sales of the Slim, if the difference is between 100k units for the year I'll be surprised.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:12AM kspraydad said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
NPD does include shops such as Walmart...they just do it through estimation...not direct mesurement. So when we see NPD numbers it includes Walmart et al.

http://kotaku.com/229825/npd-how-it-works
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:44AM Starcade said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Here's my thought on this....

We're talking about Amazon sales, which are internet only.

As far as the Wii is concerned, they're selling, if I'm not mistaken, the same SKU since it was originally introduced, and it has always sold exceptionally well.

A new PS3 model was introduced this year which was in high demand and a price point that agreed with customers, and that SKU sold exceptionally well.

The Xbox 360 has seen a couple of different SKUs this year, one of which was discountined, and one or two were limited editions, and as an example, right now you have the Lego Batman/Pure "Winter" bundle (as an example), which probably sold well, but not better individually at Amazon than did the Wii or PS3 Slim SKUs.

I would imagine if you were to look at sales (across all SKUs/models/bundles) for Wii, 360, and PS3, as a whole at Amazon their rankings are probably Wii first, Xbox second, and PS3 third.

At any rate, we should have a better idea of sales for the year when NPD releases their numbers, followed by the inevitable claims of victory by Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony.
Reply

Posted: Dec 31st 2009 11:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, I guess it's at least reassuring to see NSMB Wii ahead of Wii Fit/Play/Sports Resort :\
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:03AM Special Agent Steve said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I bought it. I don't feel... THAT guilty.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:15AM DeadpooI said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
CASUAAAAAAAAAAAALS!
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:40AM Drybones5 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I congratulate Nintendo at succeeding in by passing the market and their huge financial come back from their disappointing GameCube years.

Nintendo, now that you have come back and have loads of cash now, will you please bring us back to a quality gaming console much like the N64 and Gamecube days?

Bring us a high end gaming console and bring us the quality Nintendo games we all love and want.

(Not saying Metroid Prime 3, Mario galaxy, Twilight [GCN], or the Pokemon games were bad. Just come out with more and don't let your console get diluted with crap.

But until you rethinking your hardware strategy, I will remain mostly to PC gaming on my high end machine playing Valve shooters.

- Drybones5
a die hard Nintendo fan who pities the foo
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 1:01AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
nintendo is an awful company that's pandering to the lowest common denominator and actively encouraging shovelware for their massively underpowered console

- larry davis,
star and creator of curd your bamboozleasm
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 1:06AM Drybones5 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@larry davis

Yeah they do have an under powered console.

But they usually have the top tier in consoles.

It was Gamecube where they said in themselves to stop having good hardware, they are not selling enough.

I blame the masses for ignoring Nintendo for their transition to this new market strategy.


You can blame Nintendo all you want but like any company, they are a business aimed for money and they needed it. So like a company should, they changed up strategy. And they succeeded even if the core gamers like it or not.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 3:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd rather have them go backto the SNES days, but really anything would do.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 8:44AM GennosukeSama said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
although many disagree with me, the way i see it is that Nintendo is recovering from the blow(s) that were dealt by SONY during the PSX, N64 era's as well s the NGC and PS2 era's. i mean if you think about it Nintendo (as a company) suffered a MASSIVE blow to their wallets (their bank's, come on people don't act like yo don't know what i mean. quit being smart asses) and were BARELY hanging by a thread. which would explain why the Wii costs so little to develop. why? well maybe (JUST MAYBE) it was all they could afford at the moment and they had to plan carefully. it's like having a small amount of cash until your next pay check. sure you could spend all willy nilly OR you can be smart and spend it wisely. plus (if you think back quite a bit) Nintendo's ALWAYS had games that appeal to the casual market! it's just that the casual market is more involved with gaming a hell of alot more then they were in the past. i REALLY don' think Nintendo's going to go all "CASUAL GAMING IS THE FUTURE OF GAMING AND THERE WILL NO LONGER BE 'CORE' GAMES IN DEVELOPMENT BY ANY COMPANY MUH-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!". as i said before Nintendo has ALWAYS made casual game's, its just that casual gamer's are getting more and more involved. Nintendo saw that and, as a company in dire need of money to continue their dreams of making game's, said "hey!!!!! this is our chance to make money again and insure that we make it into the next generation of consoles". sorry for the rant guys. just wanted to get that off of my chest.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:28AM mrmobius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo has always maintained a profitable business, even during the Gamecube days. They have never made a loss on any gaming console and have always had end year profit margins.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:31AM Junebug said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree with you for the most part, drybones, but the fact is that Nintendo is not the only one to blame . In fact, the real problem with the Wii is/was the lack of consistently good third party games. When Nintendo first announced the Wii, most of the third parties dismissed it as a fad and got their AAA teams working on titles for the Ps3 and 360. And so, when the Wii turned out to be profitable, the only good games on the console were Ninty's first party ones (for the first year or so anyway). Sure, there were a few good third party games released (No More Heroes, etc.), but for the most part third parties released shovelware instead of the awesome games we were used to from the Gamecube era. Nowadays, games like Muramasa, Little King's Story, and Monster Hunter Tri are finally being released, but they aren't doing so well. The third parties claim that this is due to an absence of support by the big N, and while that may be partially true, the real truth is that they were the ones who abandoned Nintendo in the first place. If the third parties had focused on releasing quality games or sequels to some of their good Gamecube games instead of flooding the market with worthless shovelware, the casual gamers who Nintendo now caters to might not be so casual.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:40AM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Their console being diluted with crap isn't really their fault, though. The peculiarities of this generation meant that Wii gets all the shovelware of a market-leader, without the top-tier 3rd party games, because the 3rd parties had already invested in HD development long before it became apparent that Wii would be the far easier platform to make money on.

Nintendo could have been more aggressive from the outset in terms of securing 3rd party exclusives, but as has been said, hindsight is 20/20
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 11:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I agree, the Wii is a pretty underwhelming console. I know I just got one, and I certainly have enough games to play, it's just most of these games are just ok and not great. I've played all 14 of my wii games at least once, and not one of them gives me that great feeling of not wanting to put it down like games on 360/ps3 do.

Again, not saying they're bad games, they just don't really make me want to keep playing them. I don't really want to use the word "bored", but honestly that's probably the best word to use. I think a big reason why I feel like that is because most of these games are stuck in the past.

Like Mario Galaxy is a good game, but it feels like a prettier Mario 64, and in 2009 (or 2007 rather) that's not good enough. Where's the voice acting, the epic story, the modern gameplay elements...everything that AAA games in this generation have. I know mario's never really had those and it would be awkward to have them now but in order to feel like a current gen game it needs current gen elements. If it can't do that, then I guess the best thing to do would be to kill it off and establish something that is more current gen. I just used galaxy as an example, really all of nintendo's first party franchises needs the same overhaul.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Tmac, it's Mario, not Mass Effect. While he could probably use an update, an epic story isn't it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:52PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
just curious, what is a "modern gameplay element?"
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:43AM finnith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They do have that massive install base after all. I'm wondering what Nintendo will do to counter Natal and the Motion controllers.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:45AM GamerKingFaiz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man oh man... Well congrats to Nintendo to appealing to the mass market.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2010 12:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shit Sells
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW