In an interview with Financial Post, Microsoft president of entertainment and devices Robbie Bach said "something like 70% or 80% of the publishers in the world" are already working on Natal-based games. The interview followed Microsoft's CES 2010 keynote during which Bach announced the hands-free controller for the Xbox 360 would launch during the 2010 holiday season. Bach also respectfully outlined what he believes is the major difference between Microsoft and Nintendo's respective business models: third-party success. "Our model is certainly about third-party publishers making money. We design our system for third-party publishers," he told the Canadian news outlet. "[Nintendo makes] most of their money through first-party games that Nintendo produces. That's absolutely their business model. And it's a great business model, it's just different, but it makes it hard for third-party publishers."
As for upcoming Natal-based games, Bach said Microsoft's first-party developers are focused on the hardware to help lead other developers down an "innovative" path. "We want to have a few titles from Microsoft that show the way and then we want the breadth and power of the ecosystem from our partners to bring lots of new ideas, new innovations, new concepts to the marketplace."
Microsoft's Project Natal appears to be a direct response to a mainstream audience that has turned to Nintendo's hardware when spending disposable income. Considering the Xbox 360 and PS3 have effectively cracked the third-party code, Microsoft's focus continues to be set on capturing a demographic that may feel intimidated by the hardware and its core (read: jerkface) players.
Reader Comments (88)
Posted: Jan 13th 2010 12:39AM (Unverified) said
I didn't know publishers was another name for developers.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:11PM Puertoricarious said
as much as i'd hate to watch the xbox 360 become a repository for shovelware, i'm actually pretty excited for a "natal fit", since the natal offers a lot more movement possibilities than the balance board does.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 10:01PM SilverFireshot said
Bring Links back as a Natal game. It has always been my favorite golf franchise.
Reply
Posted: Jan 13th 2010 7:23AM xGeneral DEATHxDEETH82 said
Links 2, Links 2, Links 2, 3, 4 LINKS!
Reply
Posted: Jan 13th 2010 9:17AM debosbike said
SilverFireshot
SilverFireshot @ Jan 12th 2010 10:01PM
Bring Links back as a Natal game. It has always been my favorite golf franchise.
THIS THIS THIS!
I said if they bundled Natal with Links, they have a day one purchase from me. I stopped buying the Tiger Woods games long before he became a plumber. This was based solely on the fact EA adds bs to the newer iterations while removing courses, then immediately offer it as DLC.
Reply
SilverFireshot @ Jan 12th 2010 10:01PM
Bring Links back as a Natal game. It has always been my favorite golf franchise.
THIS THIS THIS!
I said if they bundled Natal with Links, they have a day one purchase from me. I stopped buying the Tiger Woods games long before he became a plumber. This was based solely on the fact EA adds bs to the newer iterations while removing courses, then immediately offer it as DLC.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:08PM chromekreeper said
70-80 percent?
i think i smell bullshit. theres a difference between working on it, and thinking about working on it
Reply
i think i smell bullshit. theres a difference between working on it, and thinking about working on it
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:09PM Special Agent Steve said
Well, considering EA owns 70-80% of the market, it's probably just them.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:50PM eat it said
yeah seems like a high number. 8 out of 10?? really?
I'm kind of getting sick of them touting numbers and how devs have had the tech for a while and this and that....
just show us some games in action that look good! right now all i've seen is jimmy fallon swatting balls
Reply
I'm kind of getting sick of them touting numbers and how devs have had the tech for a while and this and that....
just show us some games in action that look good! right now all i've seen is jimmy fallon swatting balls
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:58PM Granger said
Why is it so hard to believe that 8 of 10 are working on games, there aren't that many publishers out there and one would expect that dev kits are in most of their internal studios at least... 8 of 10 developers, now that would be hard to believe.
EA, Activision, Ubisoft, THQ, Capcom, Konami,Take 2, Square-Enix, Bethesda, Lucas Arts, WBIE...
It's hard to name off publishers anymore without delving into niche territory like Atlus, Aksys, and X-Seed. It isn't a stretch of the imagination to see that every single publisher in the 'EA' lead list is working with Natal and Sphere/PMC.
Reply
EA, Activision, Ubisoft, THQ, Capcom, Konami,Take 2, Square-Enix, Bethesda, Lucas Arts, WBIE...
It's hard to name off publishers anymore without delving into niche territory like Atlus, Aksys, and X-Seed. It isn't a stretch of the imagination to see that every single publisher in the 'EA' lead list is working with Natal and Sphere/PMC.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 10:22PM Premature ejaculation man said
Even if they're just made one piece of concept art. That's one publisher working on a Natal game. I dpn't see how the notion of them working on a game is hard to believe.
Reply
Posted: Jan 13th 2010 12:36AM Sordid State of Eclairs said
Space: "just show us some games in action that look good! right now all i've seen is jimmy fallon swatting balls"
Fallon? Swatting balls? Usually it's the other way 'round! HEYY-OOOOO!!
I kid, I kid;)
...........................................................balls.
Reply
Fallon? Swatting balls? Usually it's the other way 'round! HEYY-OOOOO!!
I kid, I kid;)
...........................................................balls.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 11:10PM zsavior said
Cynical no, leery and apprehensive yes. Blindly trusting a companies offerings after their past deeds towards Motion control just seems naive. It isn't that Natal couldn't be great, what I question is what is the incentive for the game Publishers to make great games for Natal?
In any event whether you love it or hate it, the best way to look at it is a wait and see approach.
Reply
In any event whether you love it or hate it, the best way to look at it is a wait and see approach.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 11:32PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
If the wii mote had actually given anyone confidence in motion gaming then the answer would be different. As it stands (especially given the 10-15% reduction in processing Natal will syphon) there is nothing to be excited about in the least bit about any of these motion control applications from MS, SCEA or NOA.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 11:52PM Tezz said
the wiimote isnt natal, it does things completely different and tbh i think we should wait and see before we go freaking out about a drain on the cpu.
Maybe we may see a higher level of optimisation in the games that get brought out, since the games that use the natal will be tailored around that drain - a small drain, not 85% of the cpu power. for the average gamer you are not going to notice the difference.
Reply
Maybe we may see a higher level of optimisation in the games that get brought out, since the games that use the natal will be tailored around that drain - a small drain, not 85% of the cpu power. for the average gamer you are not going to notice the difference.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 11:37PM (Unverified) said
Yeah, that came out wrong. I was trying to think of a wittier statement, but instead, I typed out that crap.
My apologies.
Reply
My apologies.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 10:14PM (Unverified) said
Natal is going to suck and if all games require me to stand up and jump up and down like a retard then I guess will have just use a pc
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 11:37PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
Because 80% of developers are making Natal games. That doesn't leave very much room for non Natal titles.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 11:58PM Tezz said
lets be honest for a second, its not about looking like a retard, because you are not going to be out in the streets doing it, you're in the privacy of your house. The main concern i think alot of you have is that you dont want to have to do exercise, god forbid we start to develop technology which creates greater immersion.
We want to sit on our arses and continue the stereotype that gamers are fat basement dwellers. Just because the Wii created shovelware doesnt mean that everyone else is going to make just shovelware.
Reply
We want to sit on our arses and continue the stereotype that gamers are fat basement dwellers. Just because the Wii created shovelware doesnt mean that everyone else is going to make just shovelware.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:48PM KeenCommander said
Microsoft shareholders will be having the same wish after it tanks.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 10:44PM (Unverified) said
@KeenCommander
More than most suspect. They're not happy with the low share prices as it is. When Natal fails, (and it will), it will likely drag the E&D division back into the red. The stock will drop, and the shareholders will call for blood. It may take Ballmer losing his job to sate them.
Reply
More than most suspect. They're not happy with the low share prices as it is. When Natal fails, (and it will), it will likely drag the E&D division back into the red. The stock will drop, and the shareholders will call for blood. It may take Ballmer losing his job to sate them.
Posted: Jan 13th 2010 12:11AM (Unverified) said
Notice how their stock is still low?
Read some market trends, dumbass.
Reply
Read some market trends, dumbass.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:33PM MrSpaceCowboy said
So with Natal, instead of kids being able to verbally abuse you, they'll now be able to have their avatars flip you the bird and gyrate their pelvises at you.
What an age we live in.
Reply
What an age we live in.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:34PM (Unverified) said
Well, that's publishers. Not developers.
Epic's treated it with disdain, and so has Bungie. I doubt Infinity Ward is doing anything with it. And Valve?Gabe probably laughed his ass off.
Reply
Epic's treated it with disdain, and so has Bungie. I doubt Infinity Ward is doing anything with it. And Valve?Gabe probably laughed his ass off.
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:43PM (Unverified) said
Agreed. I hope all the top developers stay as far away from this gimmick as possible.
Reply
Posted: Jan 12th 2010 9:46PM Granger said
@ Faulty - So you hope the developers who could do the most with it, don't do anything with it at all? You're so down on the idea of it, that you aren't willing to see the best talent in game development tackle it and maybe actually create something amazing with it?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 218 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 151 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 92 comments











