Though it may lack the star-studded cast of last night's Hope for Haiti telethon, IGN will be holding its own charity drive to help the nation get back on its feet after last week's devastating 7.0 earthquake. The news site will be taking donations from readers next Wednesday during a 12-hour "online webathon," the proceeds from which will go to Habitat for Humanity. The site will also be holding a number of online auctions for items donated by altruistic members of the gaming industry -- such as the gold-plated Bayonetta gun seen above.
Check out the IGN for Haiti event page for more details -- and make sure tune in at 9 a.m. PST next Wednesday to watch the webathon unfold!
Reader Comments (62)
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 5:38PM Nytemare457 said
I want that gun. I WANT IT SO FUCKING MUCH!
*drools*
Sadly...I don't have the spare cash...
*drools*
Sadly...I don't have the spare cash...
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:20PM (Unverified) said
Din'tchya hear boy!? There's GOLD in them tharr replicas!!
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:21PM (Unverified) said
Din'tchya hear boy!? There's GOLD in them tharr replicas!!
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:52PM reenagleez said
Right after the Haiti earthquake, the rest of the world has responded to its need for support by sending over goods and relief workers all day. Unfortunately, the airport was so full that they were forced to turn away planes, which delayed the arrival of relief goods to Haiti. Details: http://tiny.cc/haiti_death_toll
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 5:52PM thecannonater said
What's a chartiy event?
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:41PM RANDOM G Joystiq Troll Slayer said
This is what happens when Ludwig is on vacation.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 5:52PM Mistah said
Although I'm not a fan of IGN, big props to them for putting this together.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 5:52PM JBourne said
I would only buy that gun if they showed me how to use it with my foot.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 6:05PM Johnny Locke said
IGN Haiti Earthquake review:
Boring repetitive gameplay, been done before.
7.0/10
Boring repetitive gameplay, been done before.
7.0/10
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:05PM (Unverified) said
Wow, you guys must be pretty thick. It's hilarious.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:12PM Brysonial the Bison said
@ Damion
Really, really, I'm very dissapointed in you and you to Bradwort! But anyways what the heck is an echnida anyway! I mean I know that it's some sort of animal but really what in the world is it anyway?
Reply
Really, really, I'm very dissapointed in you and you to Bradwort! But anyways what the heck is an echnida anyway! I mean I know that it's some sort of animal but really what in the world is it anyway?
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:18PM Johnny Locke said
Acting dumb on the internet always gets the best reactions.
Unfortunately being stupid gets the worst...
Reply
Unfortunately being stupid gets the worst...
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 6:35PM DBuckEye said
Off Topic: I was channel surfing last night and I stopped on Fox News for the beginning of the O'Reilly Factor, where old Billy began by saying that Fox News had done a better job of covering Haiti than the other channels, despite the fact that it wasn't showing the Telethon and every other major network was. I thought that was funny.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:15PM Brysonial the Bison said
I've got new for fox news, they're one of the best comedy channels out there! :P
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:49PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said
He said coverage.
A telethon is a telethon, not coverage.
Wait, I'm not doing it right.. let me try again.
Whaaaah Fox News. Baaaaw.
There we go.
Reply
A telethon is a telethon, not coverage.
Wait, I'm not doing it right.. let me try again.
Whaaaah Fox News. Baaaaw.
There we go.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 6:41PM SitriStahl said
i would buy this if it was an actual firearm
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 6:53PM (Unverified) said
Be neat if it fired those.. darts like those nerf guns do
Reply
Posted: Jan 24th 2010 12:31AM JCDoe said
@Candlejack:
You're either clueless, or you're an idiot. We live in a *capitalistic society*. More successful people make more money than less successful people. But because some schmo on the 'net has some sort of grudge with celebrities, they shouldn't get to spend their money how they see fit?
Donating 4% of your income to a charitable cause nearly on the drop of a hat is substantial. How much of your income do you give to charity? And don't whine 'well I don't make alot of money,' because I don't either and I give over 10% of my income to charity annually (prob. around 12% when all is said and done--I'll know for sure when the ol' taxes are done).
And lets talk about celebrity homes. Where in God's green earth do you expect them to live? Suburbs? They're *celebrities.* Everyone knows who they are. Every time they go to the grocery store, fans mob them and ask for autographs. Every time they go out to eat, paparazzi chase them down and harass them. The only places they can live and raise families in peace are multimillion dollar joints. They can't go to McDonald's and eat Big Macs, they'd be mobbed. If they want to go out to eat, they *have* to go to fancy places with security guards and bouncers.
I'm not saying all celebrities are wonderful people, or even that any celebrities are good people. I don't know any celebs, can't vouch for em. But I do know if I were a celeb, I'd probably live about the same sort of life as they do. And while I'd probably keep my personal charitable donations private, I'd be annoyed if some 20-something know-it-all internet kid thought my million dollar donation wasn't good enough.
Reply
You're either clueless, or you're an idiot. We live in a *capitalistic society*. More successful people make more money than less successful people. But because some schmo on the 'net has some sort of grudge with celebrities, they shouldn't get to spend their money how they see fit?
Donating 4% of your income to a charitable cause nearly on the drop of a hat is substantial. How much of your income do you give to charity? And don't whine 'well I don't make alot of money,' because I don't either and I give over 10% of my income to charity annually (prob. around 12% when all is said and done--I'll know for sure when the ol' taxes are done).
And lets talk about celebrity homes. Where in God's green earth do you expect them to live? Suburbs? They're *celebrities.* Everyone knows who they are. Every time they go to the grocery store, fans mob them and ask for autographs. Every time they go out to eat, paparazzi chase them down and harass them. The only places they can live and raise families in peace are multimillion dollar joints. They can't go to McDonald's and eat Big Macs, they'd be mobbed. If they want to go out to eat, they *have* to go to fancy places with security guards and bouncers.
I'm not saying all celebrities are wonderful people, or even that any celebrities are good people. I don't know any celebs, can't vouch for em. But I do know if I were a celeb, I'd probably live about the same sort of life as they do. And while I'd probably keep my personal charitable donations private, I'd be annoyed if some 20-something know-it-all internet kid thought my million dollar donation wasn't good enough.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 6:51PM BrockObama911 said
Screw that Hope for Haiti bullshit. It was on like 20 channels, atleast 5 of them good channels. I mean seriously, its not like any of those shit celebrities actually cared about Haiti, they just wanted to get some + public rep. If they did care they'd stop shitting in their gold plated toilets, stop eating caviar and 5 course meals, and stop living homes worth more than the whole country of Haiti.
God, why can't the idiots of the public see through their bullshit and stop feeding the assholes millions of dollars when they don't deserve any of it.
God, why can't the idiots of the public see through their bullshit and stop feeding the assholes millions of dollars when they don't deserve any of it.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 6:54PM (Unverified) said
I've not gave a dime, and I dont plan on it, If it was me, I doubt anyone would even lay a hand on helping. So why bother?
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:01PM wcarnation said
I believe in supporting Haiti, but I do think the Hope of Haiti thing is a load of horseshit. The donations earned off it are from merchandise purchases, which "a portion of proceeds" go to, but how much? How can you even be certain it is going anywhere? You never know how much is pocketed and what filters it goes through - there is a business tied into this after all.
If you want to donate, go through the direct channels. Give to the support charities, even if they don't use your money for Haiti and put it in an account, it will further fund their generally helpful operations.
All the wayside dollars are funding with the celebrity shows are their agents and cocaine habits.
If you want to hear about a celebrity actually helping people in a tragedy, go read up on Steve Buscemi in 9/11. That set the water mark there.
Reply
If you want to donate, go through the direct channels. Give to the support charities, even if they don't use your money for Haiti and put it in an account, it will further fund their generally helpful operations.
All the wayside dollars are funding with the celebrity shows are their agents and cocaine habits.
If you want to hear about a celebrity actually helping people in a tragedy, go read up on Steve Buscemi in 9/11. That set the water mark there.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:03PM BrianH said
to be quite honest, thats exactly why i didn't donate to that hope for haiti.
i dont need 20 people with a combined net worth of a billion or more dollars telling me to donate.
i did however donate 3 dollars to my student union for haiti, that 3 dollars was matched by 4 organizations.
Reply
i dont need 20 people with a combined net worth of a billion or more dollars telling me to donate.
i did however donate 3 dollars to my student union for haiti, that 3 dollars was matched by 4 organizations.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:13PM killdash9 said
Did any of you even look at the hopeforhaitinow.org site? 100% of the donations were going to organizations like UNICEF, the Red Cross, the UN World Food Program, and the Clinton-Bush Haiti fund. None of it was going to the celebrities; there's no merchandise; all administrative costs were being absorbed by the organization. Research before you bash, geez.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:16PM wcarnation said
I'd also just like to give a personal donation shout-out to Doctors Without Borders and would recommend giving your donations to them. Those dudes are the real bread and work objectively, very great stuff.
I have less good things to say about the American Red Cross, but that is a personal observation, and I only express it in an attempt to generate thought about which organization to donate towards.
Reply
I have less good things to say about the American Red Cross, but that is a personal observation, and I only express it in an attempt to generate thought about which organization to donate towards.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:22PM BrockObama911 said
You're completely missing the point Killdash. The point is these celbrities live the high life while people in Haiti make pennies an hour, while people around the world make a faction of what the celebs make. They have no right to ask for donations to Haiti, and they have no right to pretend they care.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:49PM killdash9 said
I'm sorry you're so cynical, Candlejack, but I tend to think that every one of those celebrities in attendance at the event *did* donate a large sum of money to the organizations they were representing. Just because some people have enough money to lavish upon multimillion-dollar homes for themselves, it does not follow that they do not lavish any of their money upon altruistic causes. However, you seem pretty set in your mind, so I will not try to change it.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:53PM Yatcho said
well I dont see you actively helping Haiti and collecting large scale donations, and the celebrities are using their fame for a good cause. Sure, some of it may be PR driven, but some is also out of the genuine want to help, and Im sure most of the performers there donated to the organizations, e.g George Clooney, the guy that organized the wole thing, donated 1 million dollars before the telethon. No need to be so cynical about this.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:24PM BrockObama911 said
And yet they sit in their million dollar homes eating hundred dollar foods wearing thousand dollar one time dresses using gold seated toilets and 100 dollar bills as their paper while the Haitian people make pennies a day, the american people make a fraction of what the celebs make, and their are thousands, if not millions, of homeless people in america and around the world.
Let me know when you find a celebrity who lives in a $100k-$300k home, drives an average car, eats average food at average restaurants, and wears clothes that you find at the local mall or department store and donates the rest to charity.
I dare you to find one celebrity like that. Those people could fund the reconstruction of Haiti and still have enough money to survive better than most. Instead they donate "large sums" and then try to use their fame to weasel us, the working class people, out of our hard earned money. Excuse me for expecting a human to have higher standards then to try and save their soul with pennies of their worth.
Reply
Let me know when you find a celebrity who lives in a $100k-$300k home, drives an average car, eats average food at average restaurants, and wears clothes that you find at the local mall or department store and donates the rest to charity.
I dare you to find one celebrity like that. Those people could fund the reconstruction of Haiti and still have enough money to survive better than most. Instead they donate "large sums" and then try to use their fame to weasel us, the working class people, out of our hard earned money. Excuse me for expecting a human to have higher standards then to try and save their soul with pennies of their worth.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:30PM BrockObama911 said
And for that matter, George Clooney's net worth per year is an estimated $25M, so he donated 4% of last years earnings. Wonderful, wonder what he's going to do with that other $24M. If you're wondering, the national average wage for 2008 is $41,334.97. Someone do the math on what percent that is of MR Clooney, because even I can see that it's a lot less than 4%.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 8:41PM (Unverified) said
Why would they do that?
Someone rich donates a lot of money to charity, and tries to get others to do the same. But they don't donate ALL their money to charity... so we shouldn't donate ANY money to charity?
I'm confused.
I got a big box of chocolates for my birthday, and I gave some to my friends... but I didn't give them all to my friends, so I'm bad... and I have no right to encourage others to be generous?
Reply
Someone rich donates a lot of money to charity, and tries to get others to do the same. But they don't donate ALL their money to charity... so we shouldn't donate ANY money to charity?
I'm confused.
I got a big box of chocolates for my birthday, and I gave some to my friends... but I didn't give them all to my friends, so I'm bad... and I have no right to encourage others to be generous?
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 9:18PM BrockObama911 said
This just in: 24M out of 25M isn't ALL of 25M, and 1M is more than enough to live a cozy life. Most people do it on 50-100K, no reason they can't do it on 10 times that number.
The fact is these people are greedy and if you can't see that then I pity you. Though, if you can see it and think that thats ok as long as they make small percent donations every once and a while then I am disgusted by you.
Reply
The fact is these people are greedy and if you can't see that then I pity you. Though, if you can see it and think that thats ok as long as they make small percent donations every once and a while then I am disgusted by you.
Posted: Jan 24th 2010 12:32AM JCDoe said
@Candlejack:
You're either clueless, or you're an idiot. We live in a *capitalistic society*. More successful people make more money than less successful people. But because some schmo on the 'net has some sort of grudge with celebrities, they shouldn't get to spend their money how they see fit?
Donating 4% of your income to a charitable cause nearly on the drop of a hat is substantial. How much of your income do you give to charity? And don't whine 'well I don't make alot of money,' because I don't either and I give over 10% of my income to charity annually (prob. around 12% when all is said and done--I'll know for sure when the ol' taxes are done).
And lets talk about celebrity homes. Where in God's green earth do you expect them to live? Suburbs? They're *celebrities.* Everyone knows who they are. Every time they go to the grocery store, fans mob them and ask for autographs. Every time they go out to eat, paparazzi chase them down and harass them. The only places they can live and raise families in peace are multimillion dollar joints. They can't go to McDonald's and eat Big Macs, they'd be mobbed. If they want to go out to eat, they *have* to go to fancy places with security guards and bouncers.
I'm not saying all celebrities are wonderful people, or even that any celebrities are good people. I don't know any celebs, can't vouch for em. But I do know if I were a celeb, I'd probably live about the same sort of life as they do. And while I'd probably keep my personal charitable donations private, I'd be annoyed if some 20-something know-it-all internet kid thought my million dollar donation wasn't good enough.
Reply
You're either clueless, or you're an idiot. We live in a *capitalistic society*. More successful people make more money than less successful people. But because some schmo on the 'net has some sort of grudge with celebrities, they shouldn't get to spend their money how they see fit?
Donating 4% of your income to a charitable cause nearly on the drop of a hat is substantial. How much of your income do you give to charity? And don't whine 'well I don't make alot of money,' because I don't either and I give over 10% of my income to charity annually (prob. around 12% when all is said and done--I'll know for sure when the ol' taxes are done).
And lets talk about celebrity homes. Where in God's green earth do you expect them to live? Suburbs? They're *celebrities.* Everyone knows who they are. Every time they go to the grocery store, fans mob them and ask for autographs. Every time they go out to eat, paparazzi chase them down and harass them. The only places they can live and raise families in peace are multimillion dollar joints. They can't go to McDonald's and eat Big Macs, they'd be mobbed. If they want to go out to eat, they *have* to go to fancy places with security guards and bouncers.
I'm not saying all celebrities are wonderful people, or even that any celebrities are good people. I don't know any celebs, can't vouch for em. But I do know if I were a celeb, I'd probably live about the same sort of life as they do. And while I'd probably keep my personal charitable donations private, I'd be annoyed if some 20-something know-it-all internet kid thought my million dollar donation wasn't good enough.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 7:14PM Brysonial the Bison said
I've got new for fox news, they're one of the best comedy channels out there! :P
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 9:02PM (Unverified) said
@ Candlejack:
I am no huge supporter of this Haiti business. Having been laid off and out of work for months, those millions going to Haiti could have help me save my house and car, etc. Thankfully, I don't have a family.
BUT the celebs are by no means required to give any more than anyone. You whine that Clooney gave $1 million, only 4% of his earnings- but the average person likely has given even less of a percentage. Do the math, find out the average donation, divide by the average salary.
If you want to get mad at someone/something (since you seem like a mad person) get mad at the government for letting Haiti rot for years, helping install corrupt dictators and so forth. Now we're spending millions/billions to save a mess that was a disaster long before nature stepped in.
Also, just chill out. I know it sucks that you aren't George Clooney and don't have a "golden toilet" with "$100" toilet paper but relax. Not many people do and those celebs do entertain the whole world, alleviating the stress of our daily lives, which ain't easy.
I am no huge supporter of this Haiti business. Having been laid off and out of work for months, those millions going to Haiti could have help me save my house and car, etc. Thankfully, I don't have a family.
BUT the celebs are by no means required to give any more than anyone. You whine that Clooney gave $1 million, only 4% of his earnings- but the average person likely has given even less of a percentage. Do the math, find out the average donation, divide by the average salary.
If you want to get mad at someone/something (since you seem like a mad person) get mad at the government for letting Haiti rot for years, helping install corrupt dictators and so forth. Now we're spending millions/billions to save a mess that was a disaster long before nature stepped in.
Also, just chill out. I know it sucks that you aren't George Clooney and don't have a "golden toilet" with "$100" toilet paper but relax. Not many people do and those celebs do entertain the whole world, alleviating the stress of our daily lives, which ain't easy.
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 9:21PM BrockObama911 said
Oh look, another drone that values so called "entertainment" over science, the arts, and humane efforts. It's a wonder that there are any moral people left in the world.
Reply
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 9:28PM (Unverified) said
Tip to the "woe-is-me'no-one-gets-my-viewpoint-jacka$$": calling people "drones" makes you look very silly. You go be the most free-thinking, independent man on earth now.
Second, you are likely young and stupid but do you have any idea what would happen to the world if "entertainment" (which IS "the arts" genius) were taken away?
The world would not function. It serves a vital role. You cannot see this because you are young and ignorant or unintelligent or blind. I am sorry.
Good day-
Second, you are likely young and stupid but do you have any idea what would happen to the world if "entertainment" (which IS "the arts" genius) were taken away?
The world would not function. It serves a vital role. You cannot see this because you are young and ignorant or unintelligent or blind. I am sorry.
Good day-
Posted: Jan 23rd 2010 10:21PM (Unverified) said
I found the average donation for Canadians was $1270 US currency but that's the average of people who donated, and doesn't factor in the millions who didn't.
Either way, the celebs are doing their part. You think it's east becoming a famous actor Candlejack? It isn't, trust me. Or move to L.A. and compete with the 500,000 people who want to do the same thing. You've had years of acting, voice, and dance lessons- right? Great. Now get ready to spend decades risking everything for a .01% of remotely being successful.
Candlejack is just a bitter little man who wishes he was one of them. Easier to just hate them.
Either way, the celebs are doing their part. You think it's east becoming a famous actor Candlejack? It isn't, trust me. Or move to L.A. and compete with the 500,000 people who want to do the same thing. You've had years of acting, voice, and dance lessons- right? Great. Now get ready to spend decades risking everything for a .01% of remotely being successful.
Candlejack is just a bitter little man who wishes he was one of them. Easier to just hate them.
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM







