| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (165)

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:14PM laser beams said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
it really does look like a giant i phone :D
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:25PM Edge of Blade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Just without the phone. It's really just a giant iPod Touch....
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:30PM Hooch said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
WELL YOU KNOW I'M GONNA BE BETTER THAN YOU WHEN I BUY IT!

IT WON'T EVEN B E OVERPRICED I'D SWAP MY CHILDREN FOR ONE AND STILL CONSIDER IT A GOOD DEAL
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I called it: ROUNDED CORNERS!!!
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:42PM kojo87 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
it netbook with a good graphics chip a touchscreen and no keyboard and runs the iPhone OS instead of a full operating system. but will cost twice as much as netbook. who is this targeted to exactly?
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:42PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They should have just called it iPod Touch XL, or iPhone XL.

In other news. Why is this on Joystiq? Can't the Macsturbation stay confined to Engadget until the gaming stuff is known?
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Why is this on Joystiq? Can't the Macsturbation stay confined to Engadget until the gaming stuff is known?"

Wouldn't that be kind of be like not covering the launch of a console until the games are announced?
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:56PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@robert:

No.

It would be like not covering the launch of a blu-ray player until games are announced for it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 2:37PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"it netbook with a good graphics chip a touchscreen and no keyboard and runs the iPhone OS instead of a full operating system. but will cost twice as much as netbook. who is this targeted to exactly?"

Douchebags? I mean, that was the obvious answer even weeks ago.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 2:51PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess Joystiq is covering it because they attended the event, and you know damn well AOL wants at least a couple of articles to cover the cost of sending somebody there.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:52PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Samfish, that would be all fine and good if this were 3 years ago, or if the iphone/ipod touch never existed. But how is this innovating anything? It already exists. It has already existed for 3 years. It's just got a bigger screen now.

That UI you're talking about, those features you're talking about, I have all those in my hand right now, just on a smaller screen. It's literally EXACTLY the same, other than screen size and processing power.

I mean, you could literally take that press conference they just did, and do the whole thing with an ipod touch if you used some graphical effects to make it appear larger.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 5:34PM Brodo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What kind of a stunt is Apple tying to pull?
This would be like nintendo upsizing their DSi and expecting people to buy it.
oh wait......
Reply

Posted: Jan 28th 2010 7:50AM jennapuffer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

For sure, Steve Jobs released one of the best Tablet as for this moment, but seeing its flaws -- surely, made the impression that it really didn't 'beat' its contenders (Kindle/Netbook devices) At least on this model. Maybe, if they will release a 2G model, these disadvantages will be eliminated, but then again that begs the question.. Why should we buy this half-baked tablet, if 2G will be better?

In the end, it'll be up to your preferences and budget if you're going to have the iPad. More Details:
http://is.gd/7dl71



Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:15PM Cap Morgan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well it looks cool but if any calls it innovative they need to be slapped.

"Hey they released something that's been done for years!"
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:17PM Funkmaster General said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
To be honest, it could still be innovative. It could move the medium forward. I've never actually seen a tablet, but I'm sure I'll be seeing this one everywhere. They know what they're doing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And they will, because people, sadly, are stupid.....

"Wow you've got an ipod",
"no it's an MP3 player",
"So it's an ipod??"

I give up......
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:29PM CarpeD1em500 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At Firebird:

lmao - I hate society sometimes. uninformed idiots.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:29PM Cap Morgan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm calling dibs right now

iPhail
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:44PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Reuben:

Look up the HP Slate for a Tablet done right.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:47PM kojo87 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Reuben you've never seen a tablet PC because there is a very small market for them. barely anybody needs one. but when apple makes one that doesn't even have a full OS or keyboard people get super excited.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 2:04PM Morisato13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, tablet PCs are old school. I have one that I bought and never used.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:06PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The simple act of making one isn't innovative, but if the UI, features and such makes tablet computers a mainstream device, it is indeed considered an innovation.

Apple is the one who innovated the MP3 player with an easy to use navigation system and large amount of storage space.
They innovated the smart phone with a superior UI, better touchscreen technology and connectivity features.

There's no reason they can't do the same with a tablet.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:07PM Snow Leopard said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If this is a tablet PC, where the heck is the freaking stylus? I want a tablet so I can draw, not finger paint on some third party app somebody whipped up in the app store gold rush. Oh but, oh boy, I can now read books and the words aren’t all tiny anymore! Great, because reading paperbacks and magazines was so immensely difficult before nook, kindle, or this enormous i-pod touch came out.

As a mac fan and an artist, I’m unimpressed.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:29PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@samfish:


The only thing Apple innovates anymore is marketing.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's a big iPod Touch....someone tell me why people are creaming their pants.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:50PM Ballistic H said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
'Cos you can watch porn on the go in HD.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:17PM D0V3Y said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lulz.. epic win

but seriously.. that is the real reason anyone would get this




thats why i'm getting 2 :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 4:26PM MGarvey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ummm...you already could do that on the iTouch/iPhone and on the go. It just gives you a better, larger screen. A better, larger screen that'll give you the ability to see all the train tracks on the girls who get train ran on them! Niiiicccceeeee!
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:15PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Not a fan of that 1 inch border around the screen.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:19PM Funkmaster General said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Neither am I.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:32PM Hooch said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
We at apple make a smaller screen size as we're confident that you'll be buying it anyway, why not cut costs, you god damn sheep!
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:40PM Edge of Blade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, where would you plan on holding it when you're using it? Tell me that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:50PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Uhhh...I don't plan on using it because I think it's ridiculous?
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 2:07PM Edge of Blade said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That, sir, is also a valid response.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:43PM PedoJokerBear said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
its a 500 dollar frisbee
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I am laughing my ass off...it STILL doesn't have Flash support in Safari.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:18PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That would kill the battery you fool!!
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Not having Flash support is a joke for a tablet.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:26PM Kagiroi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Well - since Flash is both a bandwith and a CPU hog - and battery-life is a key thing on mobile *anything*. It's good it doesn't have Flash support.

Don't agree? Buy something else then. My CC is already in my hand. :P
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:28PM abelpc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
most sites including Youtube are switching to HTML 5 over Flash.. isn't as a big an issue in the long run but I have to say I am underwhelmed. That border around the screen is a bit of a shocker too. I personally don't really have a use for that type of device anyways. My wife might like one but let's see the cost first..I am sure it will be priced out of what I would pay.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:29PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Well - since Flash is both a bandwith and a CPU hog - and battery-life is a key thing on mobile *anything*. It's good it doesn't have Flash support."


For something they are advertising as better than a laptop for web use this is inexcusable. But, hey, waste your money if you want.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Adobe has tried their FlashLite development, but Apple refused to allow it to be on the iPhone, despite decreased requirements. It's all on Apple.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:30PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's hilarious Y. Kurokawa. Then please explain to me why Flash works on just about EVERY other mobile platform and said mobile platforms ALL have better battery life than my iPhone that DOESN'T have Flash?
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A 1GHz processor? LMAO.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 2:34PM Kid Icarus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ el serpiente

and thats why I dislike Apple's business model, the control freaks that they are.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 2:55PM aristokrat said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Flash does suck. It is the bane of the internet. Why else are there browser plug-ins that kill all flash modules? Regardless of Apple's stance on it, I can't wait for it to die. My old comp can play 720p movie files fine but flash is so crappy I can't watch crappy low-res videos smoothly. If Apple helps end the tyranny of flash I couldn't be happier.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, since Apple isn't likely to include Silverlight support...

Why is it, if an Apple product can't do it, it sucks?
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:16PM doubtingthomas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ el serpiente

I almost cried that was so well stated(no exaggerations on the well stated part)...sniff...sniff
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2010 3:21PM SoulBlade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Flash kills a lot of their business model in terms of the store. Why would someone buy a 99c cheap ass iPhone game when they could go online and play an equivalent Flash game. Apple just wants your moniez
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW