| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (40)

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:07PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
So about an hour into the film, the main character will start jacking cars, picking up prostitutes and then killing them, shooting people on the street, having the cops chase after you, go to the top of a building to snipe more random people and cops, fire rockets at a helicopter, and then jump to his death?
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:33PM Bubbameister33 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget the monetary deduction.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:07PM Nytemare457 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And now I just pictured a GTA movie with Jason Statham.

I must say, it is quite a good image in my head.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:13PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Or they could just take all 9 Transporter movies and through in some footage from all 5 Crank movies

AND BOOM...

GTA: The Movie.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:55PM simblor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Captain Planet

Add a little Snatch and you've got yourself a deal.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:33PM McWilly said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I think we should leave out the "little snatch", thank you very much.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:46PM Deone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ScottishPricks' need big snatches apparently. I didn't know that about them.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 9:35AM DarrenHollywood said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They already made it and it starred Nicolas Cage.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0187078/
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:10PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ron Howard? Say whaaaaaaaat?!??
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 6:35AM Zal said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I actually got the DVD of Grand Theft Auto bundled in with my copy of GTA3 back in the day as an in-store promotion.

Looking back it was not a very good deal. They shouldn't use the name of something to bundle in a product that has nothing in common with the game other than it's title. It would be like getting a copy of Mirror's Edge and getting a free mirror.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:16PM Bubbameister33 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That movie would suck with braces on.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:17PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ron Howard almost directed a GTA film? That would've been awesome!
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:23PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No, not even close, read it again. The people who were responsible for Crank almost directed a GTA film.

In other words, this abortion would have been about a half-step up from an Uwe Boll production.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:21PM Snake Robot Podium said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
in 1977, Ron Howard directed and starred in a film called "Grand Theft Auto".

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076100/
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:22PM MLS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Everything GTA does is lifted from a movie. All you'd be seeing is an adaptation of an adaptation. Pointless. Go netflix Goodfells or Casino instead.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:44PM Omega2k3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ahh, Goodfells. A classic.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 12:33AM burnman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess I skipped over this before I ranted.. you've summed up my blathering quite succinctly.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:22PM aughscreennames said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A GTA movie would be nothing but a shameless cash-in of a franchise. GTA is GTA because of the gameplay, not the story or the characters which change with each installment. You cant translate that into a movie, it would be even worse than RE.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:23PM Hivetyrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think a Sims movie would be better than this
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:27PM Alan Smithee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They've tried to do so many game movies...they either suck or breakdown in negotiations.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:39PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I disagree. I know I will get a ton of flack for this, but I am quite fond of the Resident Evil movies. Also, as a longtime fan of the Dead or Alive franchise, I thought they did a great job bringing it to the big screen.

I think the problem is... when something is interactive like a game, the focus of the player isn't nearly as much on the story as we'd like to think it is... for the most part video game stories just do not hold up to the quality of story found in other mediums. Of course, our opinion of the game isn't based purely on the story, so when we hold a game in high-regard, it generally doesn't have as much to do with story as it does with gameplay/cool gaming moments.

Take for example Bioshock. Fantastic game, I think most of us can agree. Most will also tell you it has a fantastic story... but does it really? I submit to you that if you divorce the story from the gameplay and examine the story alone it's both simplistic and heavy-handed. If it were a book, it would be some pop sci-fi novel trash; if it were a movie it would be a hollywood blockbuster. And that's one of the best written games of the past few years.

Which is all really just my nice way of saying that I think frequently the source material blows (from a purely literary standpoint), but fanboys nontheless expect that somehow in the translation to the silver screen it will become high art.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:29PM ArtificeDrake formerly known as said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly. They may as well call the "GTA" movie "The Bludgeoning II" without even making a first movie and call it good.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:30PM mu93n said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i heard uwe boll was doing ANOTHER bloodrayne movie..really? you would think he was completely ignorant to the millions of people that hate and despise every ounce of his being.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:12AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Two parts to this:
1) If you want to see a movie worse then anything Uwe has put out watch Repoman. Not the new one coming out, Repomen, the orignal. The one that came out like 2 years ago. Horrible movie.

2) Postal was pretty good, but then again I enjoyed the Postal games.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:45PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Where is that damn Fail Whale when you need it?

A GTA Movie is a BAD IDEA....not only would it bomb worse that that Chun Li Movie....it would ruin al hope I had left for the GTA Franchise as a whole...
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:00PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
thing is GTA is something that you can EASILY make a movie off of. Like Cap said in a post above me, just take The Transporter movies and mix them with the 2 Crank movies and you have a GTA movie EASILY...
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:24PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
so you would have a GTA movie sort of like GTA3 with the Italians running things then. I look at GTA now and would think the movie would be more of a Modern "gangster" flick with a younger director...Scorsese is THAT dude for Mobster films but I dunno if I would want him to do a GTA movie...I would just want a lot of explosions, drugs, pointless pedestrian attacks, cop shootings and more....I mean thats another thing....would they REALLY be able to pull off having the national guard running thru a city with tanks? what would their budget be like for that movie!! lol
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:57PM simblor said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Qualifying statement: A little snatch makes everything better IMHO
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:58PM simblor said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Downvote this comment. It was meant to be a reply to my other one. Argh.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 7:57PM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No no no. It's very simple. It's because they already made one, and it's called Gone in Sixty Seconds.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:05PM ouenwoof said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So...their plan was to make a movie called "Grand Theft Auto", which would have NOTHING to do with the videogame series, and would only serve to make fans of the series BELIEVE it was based on the games, so that they would all go and see an awful movie with no relation to their beloved franchise?

Yeah, regardless of all the recent controversy with Rockstar (I swear, is the phrase "Rockstar" ever NOT in a sentence with the term "controversy" in it?) and their employees, I applaud them for this decision. They could clearly see what those hacks were up to.
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:27PM Batzarro The worlds WOrst Detect said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it's a titles issue, they could work around it. If the other movie's "Grand THeft Auto" Their's could be GTA, or vice versa. Or am I wrong in this?
Reply

Posted: Feb 4th 2010 8:45PM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But Neveldine/Taylor already made a GTA movie.

It was called Crank.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 12:32AM burnman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A GTA game would be great! It could be about a ruthless killer, possibly a mobster, and could really let the viewers indulge in some sadistic acts; chainsaws, gunning/running down dozens - hundreds even! - of innocent civilians, police, committing every crime in the book, and throw in some gratuitous nudity, and near-limitless ammo.

Oh, wait. We've GOT that already; it's called: "Every mindless, boring, self-indulgent, sadistic action movie + torture porn flicks like Hostel."

GTA is GTA *because* it doesn't translate into any other medium; and it doesn't translate into any other medium because it's not a story, or a plot-driven, sweeping, timeless, epic, narrative -- it's a decidedly awesome kill-simulator. That's about it. And it's great.

But there's a reason no one has made it yet. And there's a reason that Tetris: the Movie doesn't exist. And why Doom was so atrocious. And.. Dead or Alive. And Silent Hill ... Street Fighter ... Far Cry... Super Mario Bros...
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:20AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SMB was good if you don't mind that the Goomba's look like the Charger from L4D2.

And you don't mind the humanistic Bowser, but then again due to low tech a dragon like Bowser might've ruined it more.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:10AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait, you walked out of GAMER?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:54AM julian412 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is Ron Howard's Grand Theft Auto: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_%28film%29
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:48AM geometricpiss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i doubt a movie based on this game would do so well... for authenticity they would have to film it at only 20fps, use a floating, unresponsive camera for driving scenes and many theaters would be forced to downgrade or use beta drivers on their projectors.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 7:25AM SWGooner said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When playing through GTAIV, I felt that an animated GTA movie featuring Niko would be brilliant, because he was as believable as any film character outside of the cast-iron classics.

I liked his sense of humour, his facial expressions, his kick-ass, military-bread hardness. It would have rocked.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW