| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (69)

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:34PM Giggman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh-oh here we go again....

Oh never mind this one wont be as bad.

*Still sipping coffee*
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:13PM Co said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The saddest part about this story?

The game is set to drop October 2011. 20-ELEVEN. 20 months from now.

I will be in line purchasing the Wii 2 then, kthnx.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 3:03PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe it's a Wii 2 launch title?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:37PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So they are proud that their game was played on average for about 3 hours?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:32PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You beat me to it! Ha ha.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"numerous 'best-of 2009' nods"

Uhh...did I miss something? Who gave The Conduit best of...well, anything?

Regardless, this is not worth celebrating over 360/ps3 fans. These guys are not very good developers at all, just check their history on wikipedia.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:40PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Best of" awards are quite diverse, and often console-specific. "Best Wii FPS" was probably a lock for The Conduit, i mean the only competition it had at all was the 2-year-late port of CoD4.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've heard from just about everyone that even the COD 4 port was better than the conduit.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was a good playable game, get over it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@John Dear

No, it wasn't a good playable game. The fact that you used the word "playable" tells me a lot.

It was mediocre at best. A two year old port of COD4 turned out to be better than the Conduit.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:17PM Co said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's true, Modern Warfare Reflex Edition trumps Conduit in every fashion. There is no comparison. Also, the online is effortless and lightning quick. And actually has ppl on it. I've never played less than a 10 player match in any game.

I still think Treyarch could have made it run at 60fps though...
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:24PM Jerk Face said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I just like how people downvote tmac even when he says something that is completely reasonable and accurate. Good work. You f*cks.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You didn't get the memo, Jerk Face? The internet is serious business, especially Joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:33PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So serious!
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:54PM samfish said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Jerkface, when tmac can prove he's a reasonable poster on this site without insulting everything and/or when 98% of his comments no longer have some sort of double meaning or malicious intent to them, THEN people might stop down-voting him for no reason.

There's a reason he keeps getting banned lately. Him whining about it doesn't mean it wasn't well deserved.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:59PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
joystiq's actually been coming down pretty hard with the bans lately, they deleted sprinkles all over the place earlier today, and tmac's been banned countless times since the new year

they even banned Bradwart, or at least, i think they did.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 3:01PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ironic

Playable? Yes.
Good? In someways. It basically showed that the Wii has un-tapped potental that they didn't bother to go all out on. Plus, the ASE was a stupid idea.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 3:13PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tmac, even though I disagree with some of your comments sometimes I do not downvote you so no one can agree nor do I report. A ban I find silly aswell as you're not outright attacking people either.

So, where did all this hate come from? As all you're doing is expressing your oppinions like everyone else.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 3:22PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How odd.
Also, why is your post saying you herd from a lot of people COD4: R was better then Conduit faded out?(Other then the obvious reason)
Why fade out someone for just saying what they herd true from people and know is true themselves.
Hell, CoD:W@W was better then conduit.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 4:04PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tmac, I still don't understand what happened yesterday to get you banned. I saw a positive (not upvote positive but attitude wise positive) comment from you even get deleted and replaced with banned. What am I missing here?
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 4:46PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe they feel since he was banned it doesn't give him the right to come back? If you get banned from best buy I'm pretty sure they'd kick you out a week later even if you weren't shoplifting again.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 5:03PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if that were the case, you'd think they'd run an IP ban (which they are capable of doing, if Sprinkles' one long absence is any indication), if they wanted him gone permanently. A game of cat-and-mouse makes little sense.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 5:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Tigre

By that logic than Brad should be IP banned as well and never come back...

And so should you, since you know, you have been banned before as well.
Reply

Posted: Feb 6th 2010 9:47PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems like you don't want to take any responsibility for the bannings. Do you think they have a vendetta against you?

Also, things are different than they used to be in 2008.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:38PM Alan Smithee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would so buy the Conduit if it came to the 360.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:48PM Petebot330 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yes, it looks much better than Metro 2033 or any other FPS available on the system.

/SARCASM
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:51PM Alan Smithee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Graphics aren't essential to a game. The Conduit looked interesting, almost enough to get me to buy a Wii.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:13PM Alan Smithee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I play the 2600 all the time and have a good time. Atlantis is one of the best games of all time.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:28PM bm111 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"if graphics aren't important on a game, go back and play the Atari and tell me how much fun you have."


I don't like what you're implying. The only reason some atari games might not be a lot of fun anymore is because of their gameplay-technical deficiencies. Games like the NES Super Mario Bros 3 trump about 90% of all modern dreck that hits the shelves these days, yes, in all its glorious sixteen colors at a resolution of 256x240.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:29PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Graphics are definitely not everything - however, when a game controls so poorly that humping the Wii remote is about as good as waggling it around, you have problems.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:34PM Nook said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good call - Atlantis was a great game - though I have not played a 2600 in well over 15 years. Atlantis went very well with an evening of Gran Prix and Asteroids....followed by the occasional bout of E.T.

Yes I had that game, yes I played it. Yes I hated it. Stupid ET and those holes. I don't know how it ended, but I hope it was on an operating table in a military complex. With probes. butt probes.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:35PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"The only reason some atari games might not be a lot of fun anymore is because of their gameplay-technical deficiencies. "

And some of those are due to the limited graphics. Yes, you can indeed have a good game with simple graphics, but it's equally true that many games benefit from more modern graphics. You point out SMB3, yet that are literally thousands of NES games that aren't worth a damn and would be less entertaining than our "modern dreck".
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:52PM Puertoricarious said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
downvoting BigFat as hard as i possibly can.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:58PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Graphics are only as important as they want them to be when they design the game.
...at least, that's what the talented studios know to be true.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:59PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Conduit was really there to show FPS's could work on the Wii control style and online play. I pre-ordered it, and I can say it's a very generic game. If it came to the PS3/360 it'd be complete shit. There's a reason people say "It's good.. for a Wii game." Trust me, I love my Wii and still am pressing through quite a few games, but it just wasn't a good game. I liked Red Steel better then Conduit.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 5:31PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BigFat, we still have a 2600, 5200, Intellivision, Genesis, Dreamcast, etc hooked up - gaming shouldn't just be about the newest and flashiest. If you've gamed a long time you learn not to just throw your consoles in the trash and give up on them.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:39PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So long as they give the game the attention they would have given it had it remained Wii exclusive, i don't have a problem with the move. Much more concerned about the Halloween 2011 thing, given that the new Nintendo console will probably be imminent by then

If what was shown above is still Wii footage though (and i think it's supposed to be), they've improved greatly.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:44PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's the Wii build up there. If you read the IGN interview they talk a little bit about the upgrades the engine has seen for this game. Now that it's going to the other platforms they can make it look as good as they want on the Wii and people will still be comparing, graphically (which never makes sense) to the HD systems.

I think it's a good move for them and I doubt Wii owners really care. I know I don't. Now I have the option of choosing the best version of the game... if this game is worth choosing in the end, that is.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:19PM Co said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Exactly Khan,

The October 2011 release date is the real deal breaker here. This game, and anything that's not Wii 2 will be off my radar then.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just what the world needs, more FPS games. >_
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:56PM Nigeria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Grinder always seemed like a natural progression from the fun Hunter series - sorta; hack and slash elements curbed for a more survival horror experience. Both have a high focus on co-op. Well that's just going on the limited amount of attention I've given the game.

The first Hunter game was available on the Xbox first, and then the Gamecube. Simply put, I don't think the developers would have been able to wring another two games if the original had stayed platform exclusive. The numbers were simply not there. That sort of thinking might be at play here.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 1:58PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm all for this move. I know the game won't be all that great (just like the Conduit and it's 69% average), but it'll be interesting to see how a game where the Wii is presumably the lead platform turns out when it's up-scaled to PS360.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:00PM Mr Khan said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if SEGA is forcing these major creative changes, though, first remaking the realistic gladiator-fighter Gladiator AD into the mythical-beast fighter Tournament of Legends, now making Grinder multiplat.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I can understand the sour grapes over No More Heroes and the subsequent celebration of its arrival on the HD consoles.

But The Conduit? An exceptionally generic entry in a pool that's already awash with banality?

Trust me, you're not missing much.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:52PM Dr Perry Ulysses Cox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Took the words right out of my mouth...
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 3:02PM samfish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think many folks were too sour over No More Heroes getting a PS3 and 360 port. I get the impression that a lot of people were cool with it.
...maybe that's because Suda came out immediately and said he had nothing to do with it and was opposed to the idea, though.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 3:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was referring to when it was originally shipped exclusively for the Wii and the pursuant reaction from the HD coterie to the positive response it got: "NMH? Overrated, pleeze."

Of course, that all changed a few months ago when it was announced for the other consoles. Such is the natural trajectory of fanboyism.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 5:53PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah but Suda is against the port. Which I don't think US will be getting a port as Ubisoft was fine with NMH sales in US. Marv. was dissapointed in the sales of their games in all countries so they decided to port a lot of them from Wii to PS3/360.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:27PM Jerk Face said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I sure hope it's as good as the Conduit.

...

Wait.
Reply

Posted: Feb 5th 2010 2:34PM KungFuChaosNinja said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks good enough to me. The Conduit was a stepping stone for them. And while it was nothing to write home about, it was a damn 7.0-ish solid title for the Wii.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW