| Mail |
You might also like: WoW.com, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (47)

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm not gonna lie, but I'm excited for it too.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:14PM Giggman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Based on just the E3 09 demo stuff, I would say that I like this one the best also.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 11:59PM Autopsy15 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Probably the think I'm looking forward to most this spring.
Reply

Posted: Feb 9th 2010 12:18AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hate to break it to you, but it's not coming out this spring.
Reply

Posted: Feb 9th 2010 1:54AM killdash9 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not unexpected. Gods of Death like apples and arcs.
Reply

Posted: Feb 9th 2010 8:48AM ToTheMoon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I'm excited for it too. A third person sword/shield game would be sweet. Throw in some puzzles, lots of swordplay. Heck, you could make it 3 different classes (warrior/archer/mage) where you use the 'arc' to simulate each on. We've seen the warrior/archer combo already but it wouldn't be that hard to develop a whole spell system based on gestures like they did in D&D.
Reply

Posted: Feb 9th 2010 7:25PM VaultBoy said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So you need two of these Arcs (sex toys with lights on them) to play a game effectively, as well as a an Eye Toy? Thats a hefty investment for something thats maybe got the potential to be 20-30% better than the Wii (if at all). Why not take the stupid wand out of the equation and go the Natal route? Just seems less cumbersome (feel free to label me a fanboy, but I'm buying a PS3 very soon so its a mute point).
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:06PM Goaliegeek said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If they can make the Wii version of Tiger 10, but with the online, graphics, and organization that the PS3 has with the Arc, then I can't wait for that. Hopefully devs support the Arc more than the did with the Eye.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:12PM def PD said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I totally agree.

I wish the PS Eye wasn't released so early. Maybe the lighting in my living room is bad, but the quality of the cam really isn't that great.

I wish that with the upcoming "Arc" controller support that it would be a hybrid of Natal and the Wii+ controls.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:43PM Goaliegeek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ ballistic: And with the PS3s realistic graphics, Ill be thinking Im actually at a urinal and just start peeing on the floor.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 10:56PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The eye is a great camera, technically, but in low lighting it looks grainy. That's just the way these cameras tend to be, though. For fast reaction time and good resolution, it's a good camera.

It's a shame all it's used for are player snapshots, because it's not really good at that.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:09PM leemahi said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
onlive seems like a great idea, they just need to sell themselves to ms or sony.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:11PM leemahi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OnLive could be a great idea, but i dont think it can catch on with the saturated console space. they need to sell their property to ms or sony me thinks to really be a hit.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:12PM Alan Smithee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Arc looks promising.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't see what Sony could do with it, MS would be a safer bet since they are experienced in the whole PC gaming space
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:21PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MS and PC gaming? Pft, they stopped caring since the Xbox 1 came out. They'll of course support their own console with its closed off system which they have the freedom to overprice accessories, charge for online gaming, DLC that should be free, etc.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That was directed towards Flyin Hawaiian (Take the apostrophe put of your name, we can't reply)
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well the Eyetoy didn't do terrible, not great though. Anyways, I'm guess Arc paired with PS3 eye will be between $60-$80 and Natal will probably be around $60 as well. So I think it comes down to the games and appeal.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:19PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With so many games being multiplatform on PC and consoles, is one reason for MS and Sony to create their motion technologies so their games cannot be ported to the PC? That's one thing I worry about.

So now Nintendo will have to on-up MS and Sony as 360/PS3 owners will now be even less apt to get a Wii if their games have the same functionality but better graphics, online, etc. Wii games are already trickling to the PS3/360 like No More Heroes.

I support OnLive if to bring new gamers into PC gaming, especially console gamers. But I don't want it to completely replace "physical" gaming. Let OnLive serve as a compliment.

Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:21PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Until proven otherwise On Live is vaporware.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:22PM Ordeith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MS has expressed an interest in bringing Natal to the PC if it works well.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:49PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It may be harder to implement it when you are sitting on a desk but then again, PC gamers have moved to laptops as well as connecting their desktops and laptops to TVs such as HTPCs.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 9:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Will will be fine. The people who buy wii are quite happy with 5 minute - 30 minute Mini games with either very loose or no narrative to tie them together. Sony fans seem to want a lot more narrative and Microsoft fans seem to want longer interaction with other people. PC fans want control of their experience via power of the machine and mods. Honestly this gen we could feasibly see each platform have 50 something million gamers each all happy with what they have. Seems to be the jokers under the bridge posting in comments and forums who really seem dissatisfied with others having fun with what they have.

I can't comment on OnLive cause I think being successful will kill them. So the only way for them to succeed is to not do that well.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 10:07PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It really won't affect Nintendo. It's Microsoft and Sony who have to prove their worth in this field.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 11:00PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree that Nintendo is not losing any sleep.

they can slap Mario on a game and sell well. Actually, that's unfair. Nintendo knows that if they make a solid game and slap Mario on it, it will sell well. they have kept actual game quality good and have beloved IP. The wii is very expensive when you add everything up, but it's profit all the way.

I don't know why MS wouldn't release NATAL for laptops. Seems smart to me that they would have a wii like quality level for all those laptops with camera (that meet a certain spec). Maybe in a generation or so.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Though honestly I see them both doing well. I know I will be buying Arc where as you will most likely be buying Natal. With this gen I think it's more of a preference thing.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:23PM Sly C said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i want a 300 game that utilizes the arc controller. that would be all kinds of awesome. in HD with an art style identical to the movie and decent gameplay, it could be a amazing game.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:49PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And kill your arms in a few minutes. : )
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 10:28PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
um, not MY arms... i could take an hour or less play session and have my arms feel fine. i wouldn't play a game like that any longer than that anyways.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:23PM CaramelZappa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm actually waiting to get RE5 until the Arc comes out. The Wii version of RE4 was the best imo and I feel that the PS3 version of RE5 with the Arc will be the same. But with co-op!
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:25PM Cheesus Crust said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And I'll be buying both :D
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it is over $100 I don't think it will sell well at all. If Sony has learned anything from this gen it's overpricing things. The PS3 eye you can get for $30 now (I think, correct me if I'm wrong) and I don't expect the Arc to cost more than $50 alone.

As for Natal, I don't know the specs but it can't be that expensive to manufacture, MS has always been pretty good on the pricing side of things (With the exception of Hard Drive space)
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:32PM Alan Smithee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think 70-100 for Natal (bundled with a Wii Sports esque title) and 50 for standalone Arcs, 80 with the Eye.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 8:34PM Monkeyzamm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm surprised there isn't a shop of wii sports but with PS3 on it yet.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 9:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great. Now devs are going to port their crappy shovel-ware from the Wii.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 9:20PM Whoppinberg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your misfortune brings me many luls.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 11:01PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they sell their shovelware cheap on the PSN and Live, it will be a solid business model. Since games get cheap pretty quickly on there, and there are not a lot of sunk costs, I think everyone wins.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 9:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Traceur_Ryuk And software. Just did a quote for a company here to upgrade the software they have to continue doing work and it came out to 181.9 Million dollars ($US 1.9million) For just continuing to do the same things they did last year that feels a little heavy :)
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 9:41PM rocc553 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The tattoos are real
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 9:52PM Mr Khan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Not price. Software. Software is why people put up with paying $90 for a glorified bathroom scale, or hundreds of dollars in plastic instruments. The right software will overrule price concerns, even if it is a bit too expensive, the wrong software will make what could otherwise be a bargain sit on shelves interminably.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The amusing thing about Natal and the Ark, is they are just trying to copy Nintendo's idea of using motion based controls on a home console. Just look how EA is talking about making Motion based games of Tennis and Golf, it's not like that hasn't been done yet
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 11:04PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
On the contrary, the wii was following in Sony's footsteps, since this was their idea long ago. If this even matters. It shouldn't be "funny" this is how gaming works. there's a reason the Dualshock looks like the SNES controller, and all the modern controllers look like the Dualshock. There's a reason everyone has something like Live, and next gen will have something like Home.

This is good. What works is mimicked. Nintendo made the wand thing work, and that was quite a risk. They have to keep innovating, or they will once again fall way behind.
Reply

Posted: Feb 8th 2010 11:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See but that is the thing, you have to innovate, but it seems to me that Sony and Microsoft are just trying to copy a popular formula. I have nothing against Sony and Microsoft. They make good games, and good consoles which each have their own strengths and weaknesses, but these motion controllers don't seem to be anything new or revolutionary. Until they show that these are a step ahead and can improve gaming(or at least make a difference), then they are just another gimic to gain more money.
Reply

Posted: Feb 9th 2010 1:56AM Cap Morgan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I disagree. I think it'll be the first gen games that'll make it work or fail. Both techs can do the job.
Natal has the wow factor but none of it's worth anything without the games. If the core gamers don't bite both will be doa.
Reply

Posted: Feb 9th 2010 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok, so wheres the goddamned interview?


Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 8:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if u all knew really how it will work .... im not even sure if that things yet... im in the game industry.. i dont know if everyone tried at least once the wario ware for DSI.. you know the exclusive that only worked with the camera... remember how much difivult the lightning was... and how much you had to have empty spaces behind you... anyway...

sounds bad in some points..
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Gladiator Begins review: Do I not entertain?

Posted on Sep 8th 2010 12:00PM

PAX 2010: Stepto's Law of Xbox Live ban protests

Posted on Sep 7th 2010 8:00PM

Now Playing: September 6-12, 2010

Posted on Sep 7th 2010 5:39PM

Engadget

WoW

Massively

Big Download

Autoblog

Urlesque

Games.com Blog

UGO.com