| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (22)

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 11:24AM Kyrra said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It does look pretty sweet. Nothing all that new from what we heard at BlizzCon last year. The biggest piece of information I saw in there was server-hosted games. But I'm betting that will be a premium service.

Also, why does this article need 4 links all to the same page?
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 12:30PM StormX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@eswat

Well there was a Starcraft Ghost that lingered in development for like half a decade before being officially canned. That could at least explain the FPS rumors.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 1:14PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe they're trying to increase starcraft's page rank?
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 11:37AM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But what of the rumors of Bnet becoming pay2play?

Because if D3 and SC2 are pay2play online, I think you can count me out of those sales. Especially with no LAN support.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 11:40AM einhanderkiller said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The reason why World of Warcraft is pay2play is because it requires a massive server infrastructure and people to support that. Blizzard hired thousands of new employees just for WoW. StarCraft 2 and Diablo 3 won't be pay2play for online multiplayer. However, there may be premium services that will have a small fee such as having your own dedicated server or something.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 12:15PM eswat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the press have been stretching those allusions of a monthly fee from the developers a bit. Not surprising since the press and gamers seem to get into romantic fantasizing when it comes to Blizzard's games (StarCraft FPS rumours way back, StarCraft MMO rumours before SCII, and now a Pay2Play Battle.net).
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 12:23PM Arturis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was clarified at BlizzCon '09 that the Battle.Net service will remain free, though they are entertaining the idea of micro-transactions for additional content (special maps, avatars, etc)
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 12:29PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wasn't the whole Starcraft FPS thing WAAAAY more than just rumors? Isn't that Starcraft: Ghost? If so I'd say those rumors were pretty well founded...
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 1:25PM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I watched gameplay videos of Starcraft Ghost a long time ago, that was way more than rumors.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 2:48PM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
eswat,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVsTrLW_04U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aMCqfU8Bz8

It wasn't rumor. It was being developed by an outside developed, with Blizzard's input. Eventually it switched developers, then Blizzard bought the second developer, and work continued on it. Eventually it was scrapped as it wasn't going well, and had been in development for years. They say it's on "indefinate hold", but it's cancelled. There's even a grave for the main character in World of WarCraft.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 6:43PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@R
Yeah, those links you posted describe those premium services I said.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 11:44AM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks good, but visuals don't mean a thing when it comes to online services. I'll reserve judgment until we get our hands on it. Still, the original Bnet was great, so I have some confidence in Blizzard.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 1:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I keep hearing that PC gaming is dying? Nope.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Funny that it is always the PC gamers that bring that up.

Insecure about your platform much?
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not at all. It's articles like these that prove we are CORRECT.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 1:41PM octoberasian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm assuming there isn't any announcement that the LAN gaming has been put back in, has it?

I much prefer playing on a LAN with friends instead of going over to Battle.net. Lag was a big letdown when trying to go against others.

And, it was a lot of fun bringing my computer over to a friend's house, hook up the PCs to the network and just spend hours on several maps in Starcraft.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 2:37PM ferrikstar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lan In Starcraft MADE Starcraft! Imo. Nothing like hooking up 8 or so computers and going at it with buds. Still do it TO THIS DAY! Oh well, guess we have to do it this way from now on. I'm mostly worried about the lag, I mean sometimes we would get 6-7-8 people with 150-200 unit count of their food cap. Whats lag going to be like when we have it all happening connected to BNET. Hope it works out. I have faith in blizzard.

Also hope they have a nice easy way to join friends and invite friends to private games.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 2:50PM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Developer*
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 2:57PM acme64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the UI is not doing it for me. By now i'd figure it would be a lot less static , more depth? i dunno, something cooler looking. This just looks like a spiffier version of the original battle.net.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 3:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't change whats not broken.
Reply

Posted: Feb 10th 2010 3:29PM acme64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
by your logic starcraft would still be 2D sprites then...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW