| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (34)

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:34PM Fo0dNippl3 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
"We came up with an amazing story to tell."
Came up with? What happened on Reach was established in the first novel, Fall of Reach.

Oh wait, Bungie has completely disregarded anything that happened in any of the books, so who cares?

I never got over the fact that they completely ditched First Strike (and now apparently Fall of Reach). Yeah it's nitpicking and they have the right to do whatever they want but I felt betrayed. I was the biggest Halo fan, too, action figures and books and shirts. Not anymore.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:38PM Dr Blight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
First Strike created one of the biggest canonical messes ever. There's a reason Nylund didn't do any Halo books after Ghosts of Onyx was done to fix that mess.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:40PM ipsum said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Video games > books
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:41PM Xav de Matos said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How about we see what the story is before we get our panties all twisted?
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:44PM Deezul AwT said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They aren't ditching the books. Those books focused more on Master Chief, but Reach is on the squad.

Halo Wars is considered canon as well, and they did a decent job of explaining how the flood could be encountered before the the first Halo game took place. Seeing as how the Halo Encyclopedia includes references to First Strike and Fall of Reach, its' safe to say they'll stay pretty true to them.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:48PM SpacePenguinBot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's what you get for reading a book based on a video game.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2010 11:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but the novels weren't produced by Bungie. They were produced by a third party. As creators of Halo, Bungie can choose to make up new material if they want. The books have no bearing here. It's like saying George Lucas should have changed the course of the Star Wars series if some fan wrote a novel that others fans seemed to like.

Bungie created an idea. Let them run with it. Besides, they aren't completely disregarding "Fall of Reach." They are just telling another side of it apart from the Master Chief's perspective.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:35PM Huey2k2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why do a lot of game developers abandon PC games?

Hackers.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:37PM Dr Blight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You mean Mac?

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:42PM StormEagle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok, so this entire "interview" basically told me things I already knew....


Sorry Randy, but asking questions like "Really?" and then asking the same question over and over again like you did at the end aren't really the ingredients to a good interview.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:45PM Zaraki Kenpachi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Tell him I will pay an extra $1 for match making firefight..i rarely play firefight because i can't match make...I need that! They sell 6 million copies at an extra $1 it will be worth it.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:47PM Dr Blight said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
There's no reason why they wouldn't. They couldn't do it in ODST because Firefight is based on the campaign netcode and didn't support Matchmaking. They'll rectify that this time.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:08PM epicmuffin said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
yes, this is a must. I've still NEVER played Firefight with a complete squad of 4.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:44PM Gandalf the Grey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well played doctor...

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:44PM Cap Morgan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You mean the Mac right?

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:45PM SpacePenguinBot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Because Microsoft bought them so everyone would have to buy an Xbox to play their games.

And Dr. Blight is right, they were a Mac-only studio for a while.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 2:52PM SpacePenguinBot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I dunno, piracy wasn't nearly as bad back when they stopped making PC games (1997?). Microsoft made it pretty clear when they bought Bungie that it was to get Halo as an Xbox exclusive and help them break into the console market.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:06PM kenny goo said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I have no problem with this game, I just have an issue with the way they’re pitching it. It isn't bringing the story "full circle". Halo 1 was the story of the Chief on the first Halo ring, Halo 2 introduced the Covenant side of things, what was happening on Earth, and the second Halo ring, Halo 3 brought the humans and elites together, brought the fight back to Earth, and eventually to the Ark where the story ends.

Halo: Reach on the other hand, has nothing to do with the Chief, the Arbiter, Earth, or the Halo rings. Reach also has nothing to do with the Spartan Team that fought with Chief and left to go defend Reach during the Covenant invasion. It has nothing to do with the novels Fall of Reach or First Strike, which, unlike Halo: Reach, actually do tie the story together and make things come “full circle”.

Fall of Reach chronicled the *entire* story of the Chief and of the Spartan-II program, early Contact with the Covenant, then invasion of Reach, and ties into Halo 1 *perfectly*. First Strike on the other hand details the events between Halo 1 and Halo 2 when Chief was left stranded in space, how Johnson got together with him, how they helped save Earth from a much stronger invasion, and what happened to the Spartan team that was on Reach during the Covenant invasion.

Halo: Reach is a completely separate side story about a group of mostly Spartan-III’s (which are very unlike the Chief) and how Reach fell. It doesn’t tie into the rest of the Halo story arc at all. It’s a completely separate project. Please Bungie, do everybody who actually gives to shit about the Universe of the games and added fiction and don’t lie to our faces.

/epic fanboy rant

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:15PM Dr Blight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But the Spartan-III's are nearly identical to the Chief and the II series. They just have less pure genetics, and ordinarily cheaper armor, but here they've got MJOLNIR armor, not SPI armor.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:15PM swajus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seeing as how you have no idea how the story plays out in Halo: Reach or just what exactly will be covered, I will go ahead and disregard your empty, baseless, rant.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:52PM kenny goo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Dr. Blight

The S-IIIs are nothing like the S-IIs. The S-IIs were part of a program to design the ultimate super soldier. The S-III program wanted to make cheap, expendable S-IIs. They didn't big children who were genetically best like the S-IIs, their training was rushed and their genetics enhancements are less significant and less risky.

If they are using Mjolnir armor I have an issue with that, I gotta be honest. S-IIIs never used Mjolnir in combat except for this one isolated situation, and the reason why Red Team (who was also on Reach at that time) never got Mark V armor (but the Chief did) is because the invasion started and interrupted the live fire demonstration and upgrade for the S-IIs.

Canonically I have no idea how a group of S-IIIs and an S-II who wasn't even part of the Chief's unit got a hold of Mjolnir armor with shields (which started with the Mark V armor that only the Chief got). Yea, it makes sense for the gameplay, and gameplay's gotta come first, but it just seems silly to me.

@ Dund3r

Well I'm glad you've bothered to keep up with *any* of the news surrounding the story and the setting of the game. They've already confirmed that the story has nothing to do with Fall of Reach, the Chief, or the Spartan-IIs under his command. The story is about a separate group of Spartans and how Reach falls to the Covenant. It has nothing to do with the rest of the Halo games' story other then the event of Reach falling existing.

Hell, the Chief is well out of Reach's atmosphere by the time the fighting really gets started on the surface, and he'd be well on his way to the Halo ring (or actually on the ring for that matter) when this game takes place. Logically this isn't a connection to the first Halo game at all, just a story that took place before it.

Ignorance is no excuse for vocal stupidity. Do your research before you call me out on something.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 4:07PM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Kenny, Halo: Reach isn't about the book "The Fall of Reach". That story has been told. The Chief isn't the only one fighting this battle you know. Answer your question?
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 4:39PM alu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@kenny: if you check out the game informer article on Reach, they talk about how at least 1 or 2 of the guys are Spartan II's (i think one of em is the guy you see walking around with a giant chain gun). The rest are Spartan III's which should be using the SPI armor.. don't know this will play into multiplayer, i would assume they'd make all spartans with the same armor in MP for balancing.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2010 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First of all they said the story doesn't FOCUS on the events in the book The Fall of Reach (TFOR). That doesn't mean you have any clue of how they affected that story or later stories for that matter. As far as the whole "not coming full circle thing" you need to realize that even though the these Halo games and books have largely been focusing on the Master Chief the story they are referring to that is supposed to be coming full circle is bigger than that. If you want to include the books then you have several stories that have little to nothing to do with Chief. You have 1 Bungie Game (ODST), You also have the verified Canonical Halo Wars. Then as far as books you have the Cole Protocol, Contact Harvest, and Ghosts of Onyx. So I think what they are talking about is bringing this whole section of the canon from a logical "beginning" to "end". I see where you're coming from on that but I hardly think they're lying to our faces about it. The story they are referring to doesn't revolve around the MC. It's much bigger than that and I think the canon proves that.
Reply

Posted: Feb 14th 2010 5:26PM kenny goo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ bwwardiii

The problem is that the specific events on Reach in FoR and First Strike make no mention of Noble Squad, so there's very few ways they could find a way to put Noble Squad into the events of those novels. Simply put, there's no logical way that this game could detail the events of FoR and First Strike unless they flip the switch and you start playing as Red Team, which I highly doubt.

I don't think Halo: Reach has to feature the Cheif to make it come full circle, but he is the center of the Halo Universe, as much as Bungie is trying to distance themselves from him in order to pitch it better to those who have become tired of the Chief and the gameplay of past Halos. It's the same thing they did with ODST. However I think this event specifically doesn't tie together the story of the Spartans-IIs, the Chief, Red Team, Johnson, the Halos, the Flood, or Earth, which are all much, much more central, important segments of the story then this new Noble Team or the fall of Reach.

Honestly, this is just how they have to pitch the game to the less involved Halo fans. The ones who just play the games and barely pay attention to or know anything about the story. The focus of the games has never been the story, but the Universe is very rich and expansive. It sucks they have to snub the fans that actually know the story by falsely pitching the game like that. Marketing -1.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2010 8:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kenny, Your basicly saying what alot of people complained about when they heard a BR could be in Reach. Just because it isn't mentioned doesn't mean it was not around. When a book focuses on one squad for the most part, there could be another squad there too, or 5 or 20. It all depends on anything that says it is impossible. And that does not mean a line like "Master cheif, and the only squad known to be at reach we're done". Cause even there, they could throw in a twist like "Noble team was an undercover team, very few saw them, the ones that did died, it was like they weren't there, only people that knew they were there were the ones who sent them".

Just remember, just because they never said something was there, doesn't mean it wasn't/
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2010 9:03PM kenny goo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ homerunmaster200

I'm not saying Noble Team couldn't be on Reach. We only know so much about the game and there's a lot of possibilities dealing with their location and the timeline. What I'm saying is it'd be very difficult to bring the events of Fall of Reach and First Strike into Halo: Reach because their stories never talked about Noble Team. For instance, you couldn't have Noble team fighting with Red Team at any point because they were never mentioned in Fall of Reach.
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:32PM ZayCube said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't know Bungie used to develop for Mac. It's sad that they dont make more games for PC anymore.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 3:38PM Fermie Prime said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game is going to be bad to the boner.

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 5:27PM kenny goo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Captain Planet

I believe the first sentence of my first post was "I have no problem with this game, I just have an issue with they way they're pitching it." I have no problem playing a new story. But it's BS to say this brings Halo full circle, because from everything they've told us it clearly doesn't. That's all I'm saying man. Don't take my post out of context please.

@ alu

No offense, but I already said that. My exact words are "they're a group of *mostly* Spartan-IIIs". The only member of Noble Team that's an S-II, the same class of Spartan that is Master Chief comes from, is Jorge. S-IIs wear the powerful Mjolnir armor, and previously S-IIIs had only worn the less powerful SPI armor.

I was unaware that these S-IIIs were wearing Mjolnir until Dr. Blight mentioned it. I hit up Halopedia and even though it's not 100% clear it seems like that's the case. Like I said, this causes issues with the canon, but at the end of the day it's not a huge deal. Same thing with Jorge somehow existing but not being part of Black Team, Red Team, Blue Team, or Gray Team (and falling into a numbering loop hole).

As for multiplayer, I remember hearing they're doing some type of armor upgrade type of thing, but I figure what ever they do it'll be balanced. I don't need story in my multiplayer. Just lemme shoot d00ds.

Posted: Feb 14th 2010 4:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This should help you understand...Kurt and Mendez got them the armor;
http://www.bungie.net/projects/reach/article.aspx?ucc=personnel&cid=24040
Reply

Posted: Feb 12th 2010 8:03PM cliftonJONES said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sounds like firefight will slip its way in...sweet...

Posted: Feb 14th 2010 5:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just wanna know when you people will understand its a game and just enjoy it for what it is.

Posted: Feb 17th 2010 7:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In case people are having trouble reading between the lines about the next Halo game featuring Master Chief:
Bungie isn't making it
MS is making it, directed by the guys at 343 Studios (internal MS studio/group that now controls the Halo franchise now, the group that Frankie left Bungie for)

It'll pick up from the end of Halo 3, specifically the legendary ending.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW