| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (88)

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:01PM Dale P said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
How many people in the world have computers able to run it, to the nearest five people?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:11PM BrianH said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
not like it matters anymore.

if it can run on a console, it can run on a 5 year old PC.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:33PM gaogaogao said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think more than the number of people who can run crysis one, since they have optimized the engine
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:55PM Fromps said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Since it'll be on the PS3/360, it won't require the soul of an orphan to run.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:01PM Dale P said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So you're saying I can stop harvesting these orphans...? Excellent.

It just seems the only discussion around the first game was how much of a beast of a computer you needed to run it. Otherwise, it's a fairly average FPS.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 8:16PM einhanderkiller said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Crysis isn't THAT demanding. That $800 Alienware M11x netbook can run Crysis at around 30 FPS. It is demanding when you crank it up to the absolute max settings, but at medium-high, a dual-core processor and a mid-range GPU is enough to play it at 30 FPS.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:00PM tenacioustoaster said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Right.. just $800?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:07PM CaramelZappa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
$800 is not a lot of money for a decent laptop. Especially considering you could probably find something for similar for less if you tried a different brand, as Alienwares tend to be overpriced.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:07PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a Crysis capable PC...with no issues...
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:39PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@tenacious Yes, just 800. That really is cheap considering the PS3 launched for that cost, and if you really want the best computer you can, you can spend well into the thousands.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:46PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And a PC can do much more than a console. If I were to compare a $300 console to a $900 PC used only for gaming, of course I'd cringe.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2010 5:19PM Jango311 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Chris D
I think all computers are "crysis" capable XD
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2010 4:39PM sheenareener said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Finally, its latest trailer is here, and some opinions about the new game: http://fwd4.me/KsL
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:04PM I AM IRONHIDE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not prepared to dump another grand into my computer to play this game.

Then again, it IS crysis 2.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:46PM Katana Master said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's coming to the console so it should be much less power consuming than the first one or just the same, plus it's a pretty game even at medium.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:01PM Typicalgamer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
then pay 200 bucks for a 360

or a ps3 for 300
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:06PM Maccadude33 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crysis 2 huh... well I better start saving for a new graphics card.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2010 6:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Harvesting orphans seems to work out for previous posters. You should try it!
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't this also gonna be released on PS3/360?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:08PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes it is.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:08PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All I can hope is that it doesn't turn out like FEAR 2, which didn't follow the cliffhanger story of FEAR 1. I hope that NYC is just one of the locations in the game, not the only location.

What happens right after the 1st game? Don't make it a side-story like FEAR 2, please!
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:15PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually liked FEAR 2's sidestory approach. I think it worked really well. The game was still a letdown though, mostly because of the weaker weapons, lack of tilt, and how the multiplayer was awful compared to the first games awesome multiplayer.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:31PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man the lack of tilt killed me! I thought I was the only one! I'm actually playing it right now for achievements, and even though ive already beaten im still getting scared and surprised. But man, I dont even enjoy the slowmo, but without it, feels like your guns dont kill anything. Still one of my favorite endings of any game though
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:32PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also, FEAR extraction point is what happened right after the first game. Monolith doesnt consider it "canon" but hey, you get to experience what little story it has at least
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:40PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think the ending of any game has shocked me as bad as the ending to FEAR 2. Damn, now I want to play through it again. Or at least finish playing the DLC.

I don't think that continuing as Fetal's brother would be that important in FEAR 2. His character has played his part and might as well have died at the end of the game. FEAR 2 lets you continue the story from another perspective which gives you a broader view of the games world, and shows that your character in the first game is not the only one under Alma's control.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:53PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would have preferred playing as "The Point Man" at least because he didnt really have a name. I never cared for the kinds of FPS where your character is completely speechless, but even worse are the ones where you have a name and a past, but still never speak. "Michael Beckett" meant absolutely nothing to me, but knowing that he was in fact Michael Beckett at least in some part breaks the immersion. That ending would have been even more messed up if you had been the point man though
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:54PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find it sad the unofficial non-canon expansion "Extraction Point" follows the events of the main game but not the official sequel. Because you were the son of Alma, that explained your slo-mo powers. To get it with surgery in FEAR 2 takes away the mystique IMO.

I guess Monolith thought if the unofficial expansion pack already did it, they'd cover another part of the story and universe....
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 11:00PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm fairly sure the real reason was because for most of the development process they didn't have the rights to the FEAR ip, so 2 was going to be more of a spiritual successor than a straight up sequel. Because it couldn't be seen as a straight sequel to the first game, continuity wasn't the most important aspect of the stories design, nor was the first games protagonist. They later regained the rights to the IP but by then the game was already too far developed to redesign the story as you would expect. In the end I think it turned out really well.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 11:05PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The weird part about that was they actually had the rights to the property, Alma, Fettel, etc. but Vivendi owned the F.E.A.R. name, so by all rights they should have made a sequel sequel. The unofficial expansion pack wasnt much of a sequel though. It had some great moments and the gameplay really improved with some sweet weapons, but it's story was even more "walk through hallways, get scared" than the original
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:10PM Levi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
A - it's being released on thr consoles, so you guys can relax, and

B - I thought I read somewhere that it will be more scalable than the original, so a wider range of PC's can run it? Or at least, if your PC can handle Crysis, i should be able to handle C2? Maybe I'm just thinking that because the engine runs on PS360 hardware, which tells me it HAS to be more scalable.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:24PM I AM IRONHIDE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you make that sprite, or did you find it off the web?
It seems really familiar...
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:54PM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its from I Wanna Be The Guy. It's a sadistically hard platformer.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 8:05PM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
http://kayin.pyoko.org/iwbtg/

Good luck. Don't give up on the secod screen like most people!
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:11PM Tre said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Let's hope the thing can actually run on someone's rig.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:38PM Kougeru said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
a lot of people here seem to not realize while it CAN run on consoles..that the console versions look about as good as low mixed with medium settings of Crysis 1. I'm 100% sure the PC version will look at LEAST as good as "very high" Crysis 1 with some settings and possibly better. They wouldn't screw over PC players like other companies do.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2010 10:29AM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm building a new rig with an sli mobo anyways. With two GTX 290's I doubt there'll be anything that can touch my rig...

==================== 2 weeks later ============

WTF?!?!?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:38PM Kleptomaniac said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm predicting about 30 comments of people saying how only a supercomputer can run crysis. Well its simply not true anymore, Cryengine 2 scales pretty well and since Cryengine 3 is on consoles it must scale even better. If you have a 8800GT or anything better you'll be fine. Just hope they fixed the damn memory leaks!
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:43PM RagingStormX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But will it be more information than what was revealed in the latest issue of PTOM? Cause that has alot of info...even discussed a beta play test run.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:09PM CaramelZappa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I really hope they have AI that isn't completely retaded this time.

Everything about the first game was spectacular. Customizing weapons on the fly, amazing physics, open level design, nanosuit, boats, etc. It was all done spectacularly. But there's all of those things fell flat when the AI just magically knows where you are the second you uncloak. Or how they can see you from miles away while you're concealed in bushes. Add in that they don't use any form of tactics, they never even really take cover. They just kinda stand there and shoot at you. It was a good game regardless but the ridiculous AI was what stopped it from being a great one.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:13PM hyamzy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
People prove their idiocy when they state you need a computer which costs a grand to run a game like this. But you know, you can still enjoy the obsolete verison on consoles.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:17PM CaramelZappa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well anyone who corrects them about the true cost of PC gaming just gets downvoted and bashed. Might as well let people be ignorant if they aren't going to listen.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 8:13PM Levi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Such is the rule that I go by every time I think of posting here.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:23PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd like to know if the PS3/360 versions will have a level editor like the PC version will and if we'll be able to share levels across platforms?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:25PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My first guess would be no. Especially about sharing levels across platforms. I don't think Microsoft even allows that. An editor is certainly possible, I remember there was a Far Cry console game that had a level editor. If so though, I can't imagine sharing being enabled on anything except the PC and PS3 because of Microsofts closed off approach for the 360.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:27PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Also, the PC version of the first game doesn't have a dumbed down editor for general users, it's the tools Crytek used to make the game. For the editor to be console friendly there's a lot of work to do to make the UI user friendly and the program to work within the confines of each console. For Crysis they just gave us the tools they were already using, but to create a level editor for consoles is a much more taxing task, which is why I doubt it will happen.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 7:27PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really hope the game won't be "dumbed" down because it is a console multiplatform game. Of course the PC version will look the best but I hope things like level size haven't been sacrificed. Maybe that is why it takes place in NYC, a closed off area suited for consoles?

It would be funny if PC modders could make larger levels in the Sandbox editor than in the game itself. I just want to know what happens after the events of Crysis 1.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 8:37PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Shut up already. We get it, you want to bash consoles at every turn, it's becoming beyond annoying and to the point that I wouldn't mind seeing you on an extended hiatus. Just stop already, please. If it weren't for consoles you probably wouldn't be getting a sequel, since the first game on PC wasn't exactly a money maker.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:00PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crytek made a profit on Crysis. 2-3 million copies sold.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:09PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tigre

Except that we already got a PC-only sequel, Crysis Warhead.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:27PM CaramelZappa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's ridiculous to claim "If it weren't for consoles you probably wouldn't be getting a sequel" just because Crytek is expanding to more platforms.

Do you think we wouldn't see a new MGS game if it wasn't coming to the 360, since Kojima is expanding to that market? Or the same with Final Fantasy? Crytek saw success with the PC version of the game which is why they want to expand it into other parts of the market. It means that the PC was a strong enough platform to lead to expanding the franchise, not that the PC wasn't good enough so they need to try the game somewhere else.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW