| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (146)

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:46PM Jjjjames said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
New console within the next 3 years please.

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:57PM eat it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't mind 3 years, but certainly not within 3 years. Although I would like to see a stable redesign from MS so that I can buy another 360 and catch up on a bunch of games.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:25PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I am in absolutely no hurry to have a new console generation. I have not felt that the ones now are holding us back on visuals, sound, or the ability to give an immersive game-play environment.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:29PM RKN said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Duke, did you feel that the PS2/Xbox/Gamecube were holding you back on visuals, sound, or the ability to give an immersive game-play environment back in 2005 on the cusp of the 360's launch?

Since you guys haven't seen anything better, your fine with what you have now. When you see the tech demos for the next systems, then you think your systems are inadequate.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:39PM samfish said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Since you guys haven't seen anything better, your fine with what you have now. When you see the tech demos for the next systems, then you think your systems are inadequate."

Exactly. Look back in the Joystiq archives circa 2005/2006 and you'll see the exact same comments being made regarding PS3 and 360. Once people get their eyeballs on the new hardware, they change their tune right-quick.

...although I have a feeling that MS and Sony are going to take Nintendo-esque half-steps this time around so as to not go back into the red after they just got into the black.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:39PM Jjjjames said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
oh come now, was my comment really down vote worthy
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:41PM RKN said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Not really james, but it happens to the best of us. : P
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:43PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I see what you were trying to do there with second guessing me, but actually yes, I did. I was primarily a PC gamer who also had the PS2 and XBox - which I found to both be less attractive in both graphics as well as interaction. I knew they could do better and was really hoping for it. Then, both those manufacturers did improve greatly with the next console, including making online gaming much more comfortable.

Yes, I am sure the next console gen will have new things I will want - but just like 1080p isn't a big enough difference from 720p when I buy a tv, I am just not too concerned with a small step forward.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nerdydesi, you do realize that the jump from last gen to this one ushered in HD visuals...don't you?

Of course that was a huge leap in technology. Any idiot could see that. However, the only thing on the horizon that might have a chance of being that big is 3D gaming, which the PS3 can apparently add in a firmware patch.

You also have to take into account how many people are actually going to be early adopters of 3D tvs and tech...which probably won't be many, atleast within the first few years.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:52PM Kyammi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Since you guys haven't seen anything better, your fine with what you have now. When you see the tech demos for the next systems, then you think your systems are inadequate. "

Honestly, that's idiotic. I've played Crysis on my high end PC, and even if the next generation of consoles can improve on those graphics by a fair amount, I am still consistently impressed with the graphics in a good half of titles being released! I bought an older 360 game that was on sale for $10 that came out in 2007, still impressed by those graphics!

Maybe the current high end PC games aren't the best example as there's still stuff like Uncharted 2 and Heavy Rain coming out that are pretty competitive graphically with the highest end stuff on PC...

Still, I can even appreciate the graphics in Splinter Cell 1 for Xbox 1 on a technical level, I don't think graphics improvements are going to pull anyone but the biggest graphics whores anymore.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:10PM sinjinn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
i think 3 years is about right. by that time current gen systems will be 7-8 years old. that's almost a decade, and thats a lot in computer years.

i think you got down voted because people are happy with their systems right now and don't want to upgrade, but i think once pc tech increases and they can see the difference between pc games and the current gen consoles they will want.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 5:13PM RKN said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
There's already a HUGE, HUGE difference in PC and consoles in terms of power. The problem is that extremely few games on the PC take advantage of that power and most games on it are console ports which of course don't take advantage.

The focus for developers is on the outdated consoles, not the much more powerful PC so that's why you can't really see it shine and console gamers don't see the big deal.

Lets see your consoles do something like THIS! : )

http://img8.abload.de/img/xrengine2010-02-1219-5s31e.jpg
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 5:28PM Sly C said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what's so special about that screenshot? nothing really noteworthy to me. high res textures maybe? decent lighting? surely you could have found a bettter screenshot to better represent what the PC can do.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 5:47PM RKN said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Those are some nice textures though eh?

http://www.abload.de/img/xrengine2010-02-1220-0b387.jpg
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The building itself looks great, but the all the edges + the piles of dirt on the ground look like crap.

But I agree - we do need a new console generation in 2 years time.
These current gen consoles are too old now in terms of tech.
4 years in the tech industry is a very long time.
The next gen consoles should be launched in 2012 imo.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:40PM calgaryaltahotmailcom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think a new console generation i needed yet...

at least not until we can consistently see deferent companies pushing the hardware to what it' capable of and I don't think we're close to that now
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 9:46PM HDpurist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The 360 is monster f-u-g-l-y --> Microshaft absolutely needs to redesign this piece of junk.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 10:28PM Railgun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A new console doesn't only mean better graphics. It also means better processors and such. I would like developers to have more power to work with, to make more complex AI, etc.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:47PM AngelTheSeaguy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
one thing i do want is a replacement for the psp, what i do not want is 3D its just to blahh

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 11:45PM JCDoe said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm with you 100% on this.

So far, each console generation iteration has represented a MAJOR jump forward:

- 8 bit graphics on the NES to 16 on the SNES was huge.
- Hardware 3d acceleration and 32 bit color on the PSX/N64 was huge.
- The shift from CDs/carts to DVDs, as well as the shift to DX8ish hardware acceleration was huge for the xbox/ps2/cube.
- The shift to HD, fully programmable shaders, and "DX9+" quality graphics was huge for the ps3/360.

DX10 just isn't that different from DX9c. There hasn't been a huge jump in graphic fidelity, poly counts, shader quality, or really anything to justify new consoles. The 360 could stand to see a redesign/case reduction maybe, but that's about it.

Now HANDHELD systems are way behind the curve. The PSP needs to be updated to compete with what the iphone can do, and the DS . . . well, the DS just needs to be updated to fit into the 21st century.

And I refuse to get an ipod touch or an iphone for gaming. Touchscreens have their uses, but video game systems need some damn BUTTONS.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2010 10:32AM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they stick a Tegra2 bored into a PSP I think it'll be able to work wonders...
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:47PM wardob said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm perfectly fine with this generation of systems going another 5 years, I've been having a good time so far!

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:22PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Ben

./`...and Iiiiiii'd like to thank you; for spelling that word wrooOOOoong this time ./`

I believe the word you need is DITTO.


Unless Dido believes this console cycle should last longer as well.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:45PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Ben

The ellipsis (thats the "...," or "dot, dot, dot" thingy) indicates that what follows was preceded by other, less important text, i.e the beginning of the sentence or in this case song phrase, therefore, what follows is not the beginning of the sentence.

The more you know...
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:51PM samfish said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The proper way to type an ellipsis is " . . . "
Most people type it "...", but that's not technically correct.



...I type "..."
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 4:09PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Samfish

Damn, you are totally right. Thanks for the heads up.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 8:27PM Stevetrop Man of Mystery said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. I started playing Oblivion again and can''t help but sit there for a moment in anvil and look at the beautiful sun set or the bright blue skies. Sure the game has aged a bit and shows it but damnit it's still beautiful.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:47PM Courtney said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I really don't feel like I need new hardware yet. I'm pretty satisfied with the experiences I'm getting with both the PS3 and 360. I'm sure games can get better looking and more complex, I think I can wait at least a couple of more years before dropping serious cash on new consoles.

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm happy to hear them say that. I'm not ready for a new generation. I got my PS3 in 2007 yet for some reason it still feels really fresh, unlike previous generations when 3 or so years later I was ready for a new one.

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Also, I don't really care for better graphics than what is currently offered. I just don't see how more realism could make a big difference.

Then again that could just be my bank account speaking...
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:18PM ToTheMoon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with you Traceur, ever since MGS4/inFamous came out last year, there are just too many good games on the PS3 to keep up. The PSN is really starting to shine as well with some top quality different games out there. With what I've seen in the past 6 months, I'm good with that kind of quality for the next 4-5 years.

Demon's Souls, Uncharted 2, Buzz: Quiz TV, Killzone 2, and Ratchet and Clank have been fantastic.

Add in all the multi-plat titles such as AssCreed2, Bioshock2, Borderlands, Arkham Asylum, Modern Warfare 2, Bayonetta and Darksiders and you've got more great games that you can shake a stick at.

With Last Guardian, Heavy Rain and God of War III coming very soon, I need to have the discipline of a lvl 20 monk to ensure I maintain some kind of social life.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:48PM RKN said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
How's backwards compatibility going to turn out the next time? SONY!?!?!?

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:55PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why am I downvoted? It was funny to see Sony at first jabbing at MS for having limited software backwards compatibility when they had full hardware backwards compatibility and then drop to partial software and then none altogether.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:59PM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
at least they offered backwards compatibility for a while, and not at all. hell, you can still get them used. it's not like they disable the feature in every playstation.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:59PM StormEagle said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Because you clearly don't understand what the issue was with BC on the PS3 in the first place.

Obviously, it was available on the launch consoles. But they had to remove it because it was causing performance and stability issues on the console as a whole.

So what would you have rather had? A working BC console for 5 months or a fully functional console sans BC for 5+ years?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:01PM RKN said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't mind that, what I mind is them publicly mocking the 360 for its 'inferior' backwards compatibility and then doing the exact same thing, and then even worse later.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:08PM StormEagle said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Look nerdy, let me set the scene for you:

You just walked out (Big Box retailer) with your brand new (Xbox 360, PS3). You take it home and hook it up. Now, what's the first thing you do?

Are you going to:
A:) Throw in Jet Moto/Blinx
B:) Fire up Resistance Fall of Man/Perfect Dark Zero!!!

Come on, it's obvious.And on top of that, if you REALLY, REALLY want to play your PS2/Xbox games, just hook up the respective system and play them! It takes 5 minutes!

Hell, I still have my NES,SNES,N64, GCN, Genesis, Dreamcast, PSX, PS2 systems all hooked up IN ADDITION to all 3 new consoles. Real gamers know what's up.

Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:10PM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
but wait, my 60gb still works and it still plays every PS1 and PS2 game....so I would say that it's ok that sony "mocked" them. After all they did offer fully backwards compatible consoles for at least a full year, which, is more than MS did.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:14PM RKN said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
As mentioned in my below comment, I like having an all-in-one solution and I'm not the only one. Wouldn't you guys like the next-gen systems to have backwards compatibility with your current systems?

We have differing opinions on what "real gamers" are. : )
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:20PM zero2dash said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
BC was not removed for performance or stability, it was removed to save money. The EE (Emotion Engine) was not free; they tried to go free (software emulation) and that failed miserably...so they cut that out as well.

I think it's crap that they whipped MS for cutting it out, but the only reason Sony won by default was because they had it longer before they completely removed it.

IMHO I could care less about BC. I didn't buy a Ps3 to play Ps2 games even though I can. Besides that, I can't transfer my memory card saves to the Ps3 anyway, which is why I've held onto my Ps2 slim. (and PsOne)

Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:32PM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
haha...well maybe just maybe the PS4 will have Full BC, just like my PS3.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 4:23PM Jamin3131 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BC was good in the early generations to support early PS3 adopters with a library of PS2 games. 4 years later, it shouldn't matter anymore.

Its quite possible the next PS system will be fully BC like gc/wii was if they use similar tech and media
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 5:37PM Istari Spartan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It won't.
you'll have to buy a ps3 for ps3 games.
and a ps4 for ps4 games.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 6:36PM zero2dash said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
re: Ps4 BC
It would have to be based on Cell, and possibly also the RSX.
I believe word is that nVidia will be supplying the Ps3 successor's gpu, so that eliminates 1 hurdle.

Given that IBM is still working on the PPC architecture of which Cell is based, it's possible that a Cell successor could also end up in the Ps4 (unless it ends up being a cpu+gpu single die based solution like nV and also Intel are trying to come up with in the PC field.

Maybe I'm a minority but BC still doesn't matter to me. I learned a long time ago (after a lifetime, basically) not to sell my old games and consoles if I'll ever play them again...I have no desire to get rid of my PsOne, Ps2 slim, or my Ps3. They can put full BC in the Ps4, I won't care either way though.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:50PM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When there will be a next generation of consoles, can we expect a large jump in graphical horsepower or two PS3s and 360s taped together?

And MS, lets try to make some better quality consoles hmm? We can wait, don't gimp the quality please.

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:52PM Wiizer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Nintendo really has an opportunity to stay in the lead once they get an HD platform out there.

I wonder if they'll do that, or stick to the average consumer who doesn't even have an HDTV?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 2:58PM KaBob799 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How is doubling the power of a console not a great increase?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:13PM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What makes you think that might happen? Are you implying that the PS3 is two duct taped PS2 consoles?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One HD Radeon 5970 is twice as powerful than both PS3 and 360 together.

Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2010 3:23PM RKN said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
And its too bad that Radeon 5970 is barely taxed with most console ports on the PC. We have to twiddle our thumbs and wait for the next-gen of consoles to get real use outta that card, pretty much.
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW