| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:32AM Maccadude33 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Good for them. Having worked with Make-A-Wish before, I can say they are a great organization and I'm quite glad to see Blizzard do this. Very respectable of them.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:34AM cowthulhu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But does it talk like Jack Black?
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:50AM Rikerbot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I respect your avatar.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:37AM leemahi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
are you shittin' me? for a thing that does nothing and took an ounce of thought, it seems pretty dick to ask for half, especially since it was specifically made for a cause.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:40AM Stevetrop Man of Mystery said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now if only I could make my chia pet do something as miraculous.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/01/03/childs-play-refuses-money-from-atlantica-online-due-to-negativ/

So much better than this company. TLDR: charge 40 dollars for an in game mystery box, give 2 dollars to charity.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:45AM wardob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Blizzard isn't made of money, God!

Wait... never mind.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 2:20AM Falcon6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dunno, considering the fact that the foundation now has $1.1 million dollars more than they had yesterday, I'd say this is a good ending.

Blizzard's good friends with the Make a Wish Foundation. It's a good combination.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:47AM Mortegro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps if they sold the ability to have two pets out at once.. Imagine the money they would be donating then?

Everyone wants mindless minions.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 1:56AM KinseySS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now I understand why Activision and Blizzard merged. Bad karma plus good karma equals justification.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 2:00AM Rawrmander said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So what did Blizzard get out of it?
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 6:04PM KinseySS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nothing imo
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 2:20AM Maccadude33 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You do realize Make-A-Wish exists to help children with life-threatening conditions? They grant one of their wishes so that out of all the miseries they have to endure, so that maybe, maybe they'll have some enjoyment in their lives. And you think that's a dick move? They got over $1 million to give to kids. They do great things for them. Sounds like you have a serious morality problem.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 2:21AM Maccadude33 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*Reply to Flying Hawaiian.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 9:27AM Erluti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think maybe he's pointing out that the $10 to Blizzard means Blizzard kept 5 and donated 5 (netting them 0 dollars), which basically means you payed donated $5 at a cost of $10 to yourself.

But really, I think it was clever because I bet there wouldn't be many people who clicked "Just give my $10 straight to Make-a-Wish and keep the pandarian."
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 10:44AM cowthulhu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But ze panda make me feel good when it do the little panda dance.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 2:54AM Stevetrop Man of Mystery said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its the thought that counts
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 4:21AM Giroro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So $1.1 Million went to charity, but that was only half of what they charged. The other half was $1.1 million of pure profit to Blizzard, not to mention the huge tax write-off they got for their donation.

I'm all for charitable causes, but I donate directly so 100% of the money makes it to a good cause instead of helping line some executive's pocket. The fact that some people use the charitable donation as a way to justify giving Blizzard money over something so useless is a little sad considering twice as much would have gone to Make a Wish if these people had donated directly.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 4:51AM RogueJedi86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Face it, people would rather buy crap they were gonna get anyways and feel good that half is just happening to go to charity rather than just donate directly to charity. Apparently feeling altruistic just doesn't cut it anymore, they gotta get a little virtual pet out of it to justify the donation.

Also, it costs a lot of money to transfer a small bit of code from their servers to your character. That's why Blizz had to pocket half.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 8:51AM ScottG13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure it cost $1.1m to develop and model that panda.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 12:08PM BrianH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you DO realize that they didn't HAVE to donate anything right?

Donations aren't required by law.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 2:12PM RogueJedi86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Brian, by that logic Bill Gates could donate a single dollar($1) to Charity and you'd still defend it by saying "he could've donated less". He/they could've donated less, but they also could've done more, like say 100% of this single pet's profit instead of only 50%. Or maybe a 50% of the profit for the next 5 years instead of for a single month. Altruism has a time limit? The pets take a few hours work tops to make, art team included, it's not like they have to take 50% of the profit to recoup their losses on making the pet. Surely this isn't one of those "$500 for a hammer" things.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 5:44PM BrianH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you're making the assumption that just because someone is rich that they need to give a shit.

the fact is that they gave a million dollars to the foundation that the foundation didn't previously have.

Sure, they could have donated 10 million and been just fine, but thats not the point.

They don't have to donate, and charities aren't entitled to large sums of money just because a wealthy company donated.

If you donate 100 dollars and i donate 50, does that make you a better person than me? No, it just means that all i wanted to donate was 50 god damn dollars.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 5:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe Sony can chip in a couple of million from all those shirts and fake furniture they sold on Home.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 5:37AM Sir Biccy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
People buy useless junk that does nothing every day, at least some of this is going to charity. Give Blizz a break.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 7:50AM shadowhowl1900 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i would have even bought it for charity but it was "sold out"
how the hell something digital gets sold out?
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 7:52AM quarlie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Say, what N64 game is that screenshot from?
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 9:58AM Snow Leopard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A five-year old game that can run on 11 million people’s computers.

Graphically demanding mmo on PC=Age of Conan’s failboat express.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 10:37AM quarlie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess I don't remember asking for graphically demanding MMOs. The point of my small joke was that it's ugly and looks super old. There are other games from 2004 with similar system requirements that look better.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 10:51AM Falcon6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I dunno, some of the stuff WoW does with their graphics engine is pretty nice.

Ulduar being a prime example.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 8:08AM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Selling Pandas somehow seems unethical...
Reply

Posted: Feb 23rd 2010 1:57PM hansl said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
No the real crazy thing is that Blizzard gave half the money it received from the pet to Make-A-Wish. So they made 1.1m as well for something that must have cost them a maximum of 20k$ to develop. Some hundred of thousands of players bought a donation at twice its price in exchange for some in-game decoration. And it's not tax deductible.

If blizzard would have make all sold pets do that kind of deal, I'd have agreed with it, but I think what it did is exploit the naive nature of goodwill in their players. Did you buy this pet _because_ of the donation? Why not donate directly instead?
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2010 9:50AM Snow Leopard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Poltras, don’t try to make this a look like a bad thing. The panda cost ten bucks with five of them going to charity. That’s probably more than most of the people who bought the panda would have given away, because quite frankly, people often forget others are in need. This promotion, while certainly making Blizz money, also made 1.1 million dollars for Make a Wish and brought a lot of awareness to the cause where it might not have been before. So, Blizz gets money, Make a Wish gets money and exposure, and we all get pandas. It’s a net win no matter how you slice it.

Finally, are you really going to do paper work to get a tax write-off for five bucks you donated?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Shank 2 review: Refined brutality

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45AM

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW