| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (16)

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 5:03PM Akronon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I see your gauntlets are on the floor.

HE DEMANDS SATISFACTION, PEOPLE!
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 4:41PM XaiaX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wait, they're firing management instead of the people that actually produce?

COMMUNISM!
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 4:41PM Zoot Suit Jedi Grammar Hammer En said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I would like to see more companies dumping the suits rather than the talent and muscle.
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 5:11PM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess a lot of those execs couldn't answer those probing questions...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKa68kWkP48
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 5:13PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't automatically assume these are executives. I know Joystiq did the title that way, but the actual statement just says "corporate head count". At most businesses that encompasses anyone that works in the home office... everyone from the receptionist(s), to HR, to Benefits, etc... on up to the actual executives.
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2010 12:27AM Rockhurst said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vidikron is absolutely right. The chance they're laying off 15% of execs is quite unlikely. Accountants, HR, and other centralized functions are far more likely to be cut.
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 4:43PM MarkHawk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Whaaaa Whoooooo! Wait wtf... is this a pink slips?"
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 4:43PM AoE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Now THAT is the kind of restructuring I like to hear about.

Take a note Activision, you should do the same... firing useless executive staff instead of the heads of your best studio is probably a wiser choice.
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 4:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the hell is wrong with take-two. Don't they obviously know the reason their games sell is because of those fat-cats up top? They obviously make the games single-handily, and hire those developer peasants for charity.
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 4:51PM BoBsS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While this is good news it still doesn't help the fact that my initial purchase of their stock at $21 is still floating around $9.... damn you EA!
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 5:04PM Akronon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn, that was the fastest moderator-eliminated comment ever. My response is not to you Bobs.

I was looking forward to that flame-fest, too.
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 5:12PM Kleptomaniac said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You should buy even more stock and then when the next GTA comes out sell it all!
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 7:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your problem was buying stock at a high point. If you are just in it to make a quick profit the main rule is to buy low (much before GTA4)
Reply

Posted: Mar 4th 2010 1:50AM BoBsS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I did buy low, at around $18 (sorry my earlier post was inflated). Then their price went up to $26 and stayed up.

EAs buyout offer improved the stock even more but their withdrawal just ruined us so now we're at $9 :(
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 5:13PM helluvagood said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ROADHOUSE!
Reply

Posted: Mar 3rd 2010 6:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they feel that the management that redundant, then good on them. I'd like to see more companies in all fields think about this. The layers deep management structures of some companies baffles me. My last employer was horrible with managers managing managers managing managers who couldn't manage their way out of a cardboard box, in the first place.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW