| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (45)

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:37PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Thanks I will just Gamefly.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 6:06PM TypeF said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agree with you on gamefly. It comes out way cheaper
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 9:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
because with gamefly you can get PC games & are able to play on a TV or even a netbook on max settings. That is such a similar service.
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2010 8:08AM Scuffles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"subject to available OnLive service capacity and whatever usage limits are associated with each given demo."

Reading between the lines it sounds like the onlive portal won't be sending you fullscreen max setting anything any time soon, also sounds like you might get booted if someone paying a sub comes along and wants to play with the server slot your taking up ......

An almost victory transformed magically into an epic fail
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:38PM Miyagi99 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok...um...that's useless.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:40PM MrAlex said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Still, Gaikai has more hubs, and more games for the same price.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
In before OnLive PR starts commenting.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:44PM plyx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This will never take off. I wish them luck, though.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:44PM premiumdude said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
wow, free game demos on the pc. next we'll be able to play with our friends....over the phone lines! the future will be a sight to behold.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:17PM BigD145 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Whoa. Slow down there, big man. One step at a time.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 6:25PM kevlar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dear Joystiq Commenter,
Please mail me 3 copies of the demo of your game that I can play over the phone line with my friends so we can try it.

I will need two copies on 1.44" floppy, and one on a 3.25" floppy (Jay's 286 doesn't have a 1.44" floppy drive)

Best Regards,
Kevlar
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:44PM PantsParty said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Why does every screenshot have Prince of Persia in it? I'm really not interested in playing a game from 2008...
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:45PM plyx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You haven't played that one, it's not out yet.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:56PM Puertoricarious said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
there's no need to rag on the guy just because he's bad at time travel.....
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:55PM Hooch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, see, if he owned a PS3 like us, he would also be masters of time travel. 1/1/2000 is where it was at!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So I have to buy the box, how much is the box and then what?

Do I can play on my tv? Or on my cpu. I buy consoles so I dont have to play on my cpu.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:59PM blueskyv201 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The point of OnLive is give people without high-end gaming rigs an opportunity to play the games they've always wanted to (Crysis etc.)
Also, CPU is not the same thing as PC.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:07PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Play the games they've always wanted to play with considerable latency*

Fixed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 6:19PM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@bluesky_v2.01

Showing your youthfulness a bit there mate. Its not used nowadays, but back in the 90s it was considered perfectly acceptable to call a PC a CPU. Helped the layman keep track of the fact that his monitor was not his computer.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:54PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great idea with a terrible business model. A lead parachute to richdom.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:54PM Puertoricarious said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
i've always thought to myself, "man, it'd be really nice to have xbox live silver without the xbox."

dreams can come true, folks.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 4:57PM MrAlex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You made my day +1
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:03PM David Black said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I hope both of these streaming services enjoy some level of success. Competition tends to be great for the consumer.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:06PM Akronon said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
*crickets*
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:20PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
This is lame! Yeah! Saying stuff is lame makes me awesome! What's that? They've been working on this technology for eight years and it will likely spearhead the ultimate shift of computing from end-point to terminal based, utterly changing the kinds of collaborative applications possible? Whatever! If it's not already out and something I can use right now then it will NEVER come out or be awesome EVER!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:29PM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have a hard time believing that the general public is going to buy into terminal based computing when personal computers are so cheap and readily available. Why would I bother paying a subscription fee (leaving games completely out of the equation) to use a cloud-based computer, when I could just use my own computer at home? It makes absolutely no sense.

My prediction might not be worth much, but I'd imagine that very few people are going to pay 15 dollars a month plus the rental fees, plus other fees, to use a service like OnLive. For that much a month you could upgrade your computer bit by bit until it was powerful enough to play whatever game it is you are wanting to play in the first place. Maybe OnLive could have had potential as a rental platform (since PC games can't be rented at a place such as blockbuster or GameFly) but that isn't going to matter a whole lot when there are only a couple of non-MMORPG exclusives for the PC per year.

So, yeah, after a long hype campaign, we are finally seeing the finished OnLive product, and it isn't exactly wowing most of us. If that makes us awesome then...well...we must be awesome.

Oh crap it's time for jeopardy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:35PM seemoneh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Way to be a douche, douche.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:36PM Duke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh relax, we get it that you are into this idea but there are flaws to the business model that deserve criticism. The issue isn't the tech or the service - it's the pricing schemes.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:26PM GameGoal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea you still have to buy the service to buy the games. This is crap. On their facebook and twitter page they had that you can buy the games without the service and about 30-45 minutes later they deleted the comment and reposted it without the part where you can just buy the games without subscribing to the service!
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:29PM SmashZilla said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If it was just the $15 a month for unlimited access to streaming games, I could see Onlive being successful with the low end laptop/netbook market. I would even go so far to say that it sounds like a good deal.

But this pricing scheme right now is just too much for too little, and this new "deal" ain't much better.

I'll stick with instantaction.com tyvm.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 5:53PM whylekat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still predict this is doomed to failure
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 6:00PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They really should try to get some IPs like Crysis, something that would add weight to the idea of "I'd never be able to play this otherwise."
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 8:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This kind of comment epitomizes the level of research done by the typical blog post comment maker. Sure, Crysis is only the game they've demoed on the service THE MOST but why should he have to know that before telling people who've been in their industry for decades what they're doing wrong?
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 7:10PM kmcroc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shit you can paint it blue ,make it dance or say my name. yet still not interested
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 6:26PM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Another big problem is that the tech to buy a new computer/upgrade isnt that much. For under 600, I recently got myself a new motherboard, 3.4ghz quad core, 6 gigs DDR31600 ram, and a 1 terabyte HDD. After a new GPU, ill have a system that will probably be able to max things out for the next 2.5 years, for under 800. in the same timeframe, just the monthly fee for onlive would run you what? 450? plus the game rentals and any other fees, plus the bandwith consumption, plus the fact that its for "games only."

The onlive box is basically a dummy terminal connecting to servers, which is tech from like the 80s. Having a flawless streaming experience would be the real tech marvel, but its just not worth it for most people.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 9:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
OnLive caters to those of us who dont own/wont buy/cant build a 700-1000$ PC. I would happily sign up to play mirrors edge on the highest settings, with AA and PhysX and all the bells and whistles. If you already spent that 700$-1000$ on a gaming rig, this is NOT aimed at you. So shut up already. I'm tired of every article about OnLive, the same whining little bitches "oh oh this is so useless, theres lag there laaa..""" shut up. Its for someone else. And we heard you the first thousand times. Jehehehesus christ.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 10:19PM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For $1000 you can build a small-mid end server.
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2010 10:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not gonna spend 1000$ to play games (i have a laptop for all other PC needs, so its all about the games). Not even gonna spend 500$ since i have consoles already, which have the same library for the most part. This is only to play optimized versions of those games. And 15 bucks a month, plus whatever the game cost to try is much more sane.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:55AM demon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You do realize that to actually play the game in the purported 720p quality smoothly, you'll probably need a machine in about that range anyway? No, the old PII-450 you have sitting in your closet from years ago isn't going to cut it. So really, you're not going to be gaining as much as you might think.
Reply

Posted: Mar 12th 2010 10:46PM QuePasa87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No thanks to this.
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2010 12:15AM PantsParty said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I lost my dagger that controls time...
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2010 3:52AM RageOverdose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was completely fine with OnLive's subscription fee, based on the fact that they need to make money somehow. Just what they get out of the sales/rentals may not be able to cover it. Well, that was my logic anyhow.

But Gaikai seems to be doing the same thing, but with seemingly more overall capacity, sans subscription.

It's a good thing competition is so strong in this new service, is all I have to say anymore.
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2010 10:53AM KaneBaker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think this thing will be even bigger than the Phantom !
This is the future.
Reply

Posted: Mar 13th 2010 11:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would like to play Crysis on a netbook because I love playing large, attention demanding, spectacle filled games on very small, low quality screens. Also, more than anything I want to pay a monthly subscription fee to gain the ability to purchase access to a streaming feed of a game on a service from a company whose CEO is one of the people who created webTV. I also enjoy sticking French fries up my nose and drinking used motor oil whilst firing all of my money out of a cannon at various technology.
Reply

Posted: Mar 16th 2010 11:40AM paper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems like this would be more money for less value and a lack of sense of ownership of your games.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW