| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (16)

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:34AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Get on Counter-Strike 2!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 12:24PM Soundwave said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But there have been three Counter-Strike games so far. (Counter-Strike, Counter-Strike: Condition Zero, and Counter-Strike Source)

imo CS really doesn't need a sequel, seeing as how it has really only changed graphically. (Yes, there are differences in gameplay between 1.6 and Source, but I don't think they are large enough changes to matter that much) It really only needs to be updated to the Orange Box engine like Day of Defeat Source was a while ago.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 12:34PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those CSes aren't sequels they are practically expansions. CS Source has been out way too long as it is already.

Both CS and DoD sequels would be entirely great sellers. I don't want another updated CS. I want a new one. The game has been out since 1999.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 12:50PM Soundwave said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Remember that a good portion of the Counter-Strike community still claims that 1.6 is better than Source in every way. I really don't think they'd accept a full blown sequel.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 12:51PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They can stick to their 1.6. Just like people stick to MW over MW2. Quake 1 still has a hardcore community. That didn't stop new quake games from being released. Don't set everyone else on the side just to keep the 1.6/source players happy. Besides half of them are playing surf maps.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 1:05PM Vcize said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I thought CoD4 was the sequel to CS?
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:35AM Tre said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DEVELOP L4D PS3, TURTLE ROCK, I BEG OF YOU.

You may resume your commenting now.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3 graphics are terrible. Wii is so much better.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:59AM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Wii? I dunno, I've always found the Sega CD to be revolutionary in graphics and animation.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 12:14PM Soundwave said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The Atari 2600 is the pinnacle of realistic graphics.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 12:29PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
[MAH BOI]
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 4:52PM Stubs24 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yo Mephisto,
I'm really happy for you,
and imma let you finish,
But Etch-a-Sketch had the best graphics of all time
Reply

Posted: Mar 18th 2010 10:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This post reminds me that i should be playing link to the past right now...

brb!
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:56AM Soundwave said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think that the revived Turtle Rock has any control over Left 4 Dead.
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 11:56AM Soundwave said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or Counter-Strike, for that matter
Reply

Posted: Mar 17th 2010 6:51PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still think their next game will be a western.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW