| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (94)

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 10:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GOTY 09 in my books, by the way.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:25PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Who cares? MAG has taken the multiplayer throne.

Will this game have 256 players? No.
Will it actually involve teamwork? No.
Will it have a bunch of racist 12 year olds? Yes.

Hard to get excited when every other company is innovating while bungie sticks to their generic gameplay.

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:28PM Funkmaster General said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Looks like someone has sand in their....I don't even have the hart to finish it.

Anyway, you're a douche.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:29PM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I personally don't see the appeal of Halo but that's not to say it's bad or another game's better... It all comes down to preference.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:29PM Dr Blight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get MAG fanboys.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:33PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
And I don't get Halo fanboys.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:34PM Funkmaster General said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm not a rabid Halo fanboy. I just like it. I like MAG as well, and Battlefield. What? you're saying I can only like the one you deem superior?

Well, shucks.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:40PM Soundwave said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How you can still have teamwork with anything beyond twelve players is beyond me. (Although for the record, everything he says is true. The last time I saw actual teamwork in a Halo game was several years ago, and I mostly play team games.)
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:43PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
How is every other company innovating? Aside from MAG, everything else is pretty much the same, and aside from a huge number of players, MAG was not innovative at all, it was downright derivative! Let's make a list. MW2? That's exactly the same as MW1. BFBC2? That's BFBC1, they just fixed the hit detection. MAG? Battefield with more people.
I don't see what makes Halo "the same old gameplay" but MAG is basically the same as any other fps and that escapes your ire. It's not like people even want the basic gameplay to change, then there'd be no point in a sequel. Reach might be the same old first person shooter stuff, but did the other 4 halos have jetpacks, detailed armor customization or armor loadouts before the game is even out? No? What's that called then? Innovation? [Ed - be respectful!]
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:48PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
How is adding jetpacks innovative? Or customizing abilities?

This is the problem with Halo fanboys: they think bungie invented the first person shooter.

[Ed - be respectful!]
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:51PM Xaeinovis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Silly, stupid comment is hilariously stupid.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:51PM Dr Blight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Go play Perfect Dark, or any other pre-Halo 1 console shooter. Then play Halo CE.

Bungie set the standard for console FPS's, and it's been copied from them time and time again.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Great job, Bradwart. There is a reason we hired you at Bungie. Now, come back to the studio; we need something to be shined.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:54PM Hyperion45 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Wayne -- No, that's not called innovation. Innovation is when something totally new or different is added, which has not been seen before. The words you were looking for were "New things in the sequel."

Because Reach isn't innovative, it's just adding new to things to the game that have been in other games.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:16PM aristokrat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
By that logic, it is impossible for any sequel to innovate. If MAG 1 had normal multiplayer and MAG 2 had 256 people, it'd just be a sequel with new things added. That's a ridiculous argument.

I'd say one of the biggest innovations for Reach is the Arena. On-going monthly tournaments sounds like fun, and it'll keep people from selling accounts so that they can go pwn noobs as a level 1 again. I think the skill-based competition with no permanent max level will be fun.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:45PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Hyperion Fine, it might not be innovative to the industry as a whole, but it is adding new things to the series, so it is changing what severe called "generic gameplay". If adding new things and modes and everything to a sequel doesn't qualify as changing the gameplay, than adding a lot of people doesn't either.
@Severe Please try something different than the standard copy paste troll responses. Did i at all indicate that bungie invented FPS? No, absolutely not, I know they didn't, but I also know that MAG didn't invent large battles either.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Bungie doesn't pay you to be their mouth-piece, Dark Wayne.

Name another console game with 256 players...

Jetpacks: Tribes
Customizing: almost every single fps game in the last 10 years has customizing.

Next time try and make an actual argument if you don't want to look like a fanboy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 2:29AM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Dear Severe,
-Saved films
-Screenshot upload
-File share
-Forge

It's 2010 and I've yet to see another FPS do any of these things a 2007 game did.
Reply

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 5:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@343 Guilty Fart.

Snap.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:30PM Turdballs said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
People still play Halo????

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:34PM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No... That's just why they're releasing a huge budget blockbuster Halo title. Because, you know, no one plays it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:40PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
As long as their are racist 12 year olds, there will be Halo.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:41PM Dr Blight said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, the 150 thousand people playing a nearly three year old game on a weekday don't exist...
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:44PM MGTrey said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's even sweeter that a non-Halo fan shot this troll down.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:46PM Jamis7 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
It's still the #2 game on Xbox Live, above Bad Company 2 even. So yeah people still play it.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:17PM aristokrat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Severe, MW2 holds the racist 12-year old crown. Get your trolling facts straight.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:31PM DokiDokiBawanga said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So....can you be a girl master chief? coz i want to play as girl. =(

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:41PM Soundwave said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Maybe? Halo 3 had a gender option in the player customization menu, although all that did was change your character's death screams.

It's kind of hard to tell gender when you're wearing half a car, anyway
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:41PM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This year reminds me a lot of 2007, so many great game. Heavy Rain, GOW III, Halo: Reach, FF XIII, GT5, Bioshock 2, Alan Wake, The Last Guardian(?), Super Mario Galaxy 2, and countless others... I mean, damn

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:44PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
see it just reminds of of 2009, 2008, and 2007.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:56PM Anticrawl said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Gamers are probably the most optimistic and positive group of people out there. Always, "Best year ever! Great time to be a gamer!" Every year is the best year yet. To bad the rest of society doesn't work that way.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:05PM F1 Basu Gasu Bakuhatsu said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's because the rest of society can't beat the ever loving shit out of a fire breathing turtle every day.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 6:42PM QuePasa87 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow this really sounds like the definitive Halo experience. They called the first game combat evolved, but this really seems like it should have that title.

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:06PM F1 Basu Gasu Bakuhatsu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well it's like pokemon. There's always one more evolution!
Reply

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 2:40AM BrokenTriforce said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tell that to Aerodactyl.
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:13PM Crusty Magic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PLEASE be good.

I want to love you again Halo.

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I love Halo's general visual feel and aesthetic; it makes me chuckle though, about which things they had to exclude for the sake of gameplay. Specifically, about Master Chief's helmet.

It's almost 500 years into the future, and Master Chief, in the newest, toughest super armor, still can't see in the dark (only having a personal spot light.) So no nightvision, no thermal optics, no motion tracking, no IFF, no telemetry, etc. Besides contained breathable air, what on earth was that helmet useful for?

ODST retro-actively addresses some of this, as you got a kind of visual amplification and IFF ability - stuff that Spartan IIs and IIIs probably also have though you don't get any of that in Halo 1 through 3. ODST introduced those helmet add-ons though, which makes you wonder what Romeo's sniper attachment does that the helmet itself couldn't do (or that the gun couldn't do - optics on guns do all the zooming for you)

Just some nerd venting, thought it was funny.

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 7:48PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah, it makes even less sense given that all the expanded fiction basically says the Spartans have night vision with just their plain eyes as it is
Reply

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 8:55PM shimrra74 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
JIZZ IN MY PANTS

Posted: Mar 25th 2010 9:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Full customization of your Spartan, jetpacks, and more open worlds? Bungie is finishing the Halo series with a bang aren't they?

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 12:38AM WMcPete said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope the Elites get lots of customization options. They kind of got shafted in Halo 3...

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 2:42AM BrokenTriforce said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wort wort wort.
Reply

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 1:02AM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bungie is a genious!

Posted: Mar 26th 2010 5:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait wait wait wait wait.....

Modern Warfare 2 has customizable armour? Did I miss this? I mean I know snipers get ghillie suits, riot shields seem to be waering extra face armour and guys carrying shotguns tend have shells strapped to them.... Is that what joystiq is talking about?

Also, I wasn't before but I'm starting to get a boner for Halo Reach.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW