| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (56)

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:03AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
[deleted]
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:07AM Kif said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Try what? A 'First' post? Why don't you try this, too?

-1!
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:08AM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, beto, here's a warning from me to you:

"First" is a banable (ban-able?) offense around here.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:09AM MystileArmor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yes, it's definitely bananable.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:10AM fredgaso said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
u r getting banned
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:13AM R Planteer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Or banana'ed. Either way, doesnt sound fun.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:24AM ThatStuffsLethal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ewww at the thought of someone being "banana'ed"...
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:54AM Solar Jetman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's also banal-ably boring no matter where you are.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 1:03AM ThatStuffsLethal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
-_-
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 2:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
banana-bana-hamma
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 9:22AM Rocketboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bananna-Rama?
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:04AM WiredKnight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I have always wanted to do this.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So going to try this....
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Cool idea but why did they use GTA4 as a reference? GTA4's camera is horrible for driving even in the game because it's way too close to the car. I remember I had to constantly flick the camera upwards with the right analog stick in order to see what was ahead on the road. I think they should have used Gran Turismo or Forza's fixed third person camera since it's a little bit higher and you can clearly see what lies ahead on the road.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:11AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You *can* change the camera view in GTA4. But one of the things that drew me into the game was using the really close view, and watching the road through the back and front windows. For some reason, seeing the whole car--inside and out--bouncing around made things seem much more lifelike.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:36AM DerickDBrown said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think you missed the point.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 1:16AM Temidien said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Wired

You thought running over hookers in GTAIV was lifelike? Remind me to steer clear of whatever town you call home...
Reply

Posted: Sep 21st 2010 7:47AM Jive Turkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But there's no Yakuza in GT or Forza ^_^
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 2:54AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um, what? When did I say anything about hookers?

I was simply saying that I happen to like their camera set up. That's all.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 2:54AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But I do also agree that the other camera settings aren't high enough.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 5:27AM Haizeus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Tem: So, you're a hooker? I'd like a list of your going rates, baby.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:07AM sonicspike41 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
That's pretty cool. It'd be better if the camera was a little higher up (so you can see more of the road immediately in front of you) but it's still really cool.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 1:02AM Solar Jetman said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I hate having to hold the right stick "just so". But clearly they're going for GTA4 realism. :) I would love to try it.
Now that I think about it, I would absolutely use cockpit view for driving games that require precision (like real life), but I don't play any of those. I play driving games where you need to know who's on your bumper and exactly where to start your power drift.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:10AM Dr Blight said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Okay, so the leaders in Halo machinina don't use Halo as a basis?
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:49AM Special Agent Steve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, they left their warthog in their OTHER summer home.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:12AM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Camera really seems like it should have been higher up than it was, as I remember having a better view of the front of the car in GTA IV. Other than that though, in racing games and such I usually prefer driving in the windshield view myself.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:13AM ch3burashka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Genius. Little do we know this is how people will drive in the future.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:14AM Dr Blight said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
People won't drive. Either VIKI will drive for us or Skynet will kill us, so it's irrelevant.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:26AM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I had to google VIKI. Can't believe I don't remember that name from the movie I, Robot.

I wouldn't mind having a central DPS/DMV computer that would direct all traffic. The only thing that would suck is the long waiting times to get anywhere with them.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:28AM Dr Blight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, I don't want a central computer. I enjoy driving too much.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:37AM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How about assisted driving? Just imagine a GPS that does everything in real time but can also help you avoid accidents by switching lanes/braking should it detect the vehicle in front of you suddenly stopped.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 1:15AM Radical Dylan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
only reason you enjoy driving is because you don't have to drive 2+ hours a day. I'd love for an auto driving system, that way i can sleep or do my work on the trip.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 8:24AM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I live in the UK, so we'd end up with Holy driving us.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:22AM ThatStuffsLethal said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Lol, that jump kick looked painful.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:25AM Cdy2007 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I WIN SCIENCE! :D
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:25AM Lord Minogue said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lucky them to have a Canon 5D MKII handy; a setup like that costs at least $4000. I guess they couldn't find a cheaper camera with a wide angle lens...
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:26AM Dr Blight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think they're hurting for money...
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:04PM XLM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the body is 2499 street and the 17-40 L series is like $800 (if that's what they used). Those can be found cheaper on line too.

So more like around 3K, but regardless, it's a write offable business expense =)
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah it's true you could change the camera but once you started going very fast the camera would always go a bit lower. I also sometimes enjoyed using the camera you described because I could see the car details better but I had to move the camera too much.

Still my point was that the camera that they used in the experiment was fixed and taking that into consideration they should have placed it higher. It's still a cool experiment though.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:27AM incubeezer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"... and my good friend 'sex appeal'".
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:35AM Dr Blight said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
And Winterfang misses the point.

It's not intended to be a workable concept for production.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:47AM ZGiSH said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The problem with this is that the camera is static. It makes it look like the environment is moving around the car instead of the car moving around the environment. In GTA4, the camera was dynamic and you could see your car swerving and such.

I'm pretty sure if there was a dynamic camera ( not sure how they would manage that ) it would be a lot easier to drive.

Good video and experiment though!
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 1:56AM JBourne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I never thought about the implications of having a static camera. Thanks for pointing that out, man.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:48AM leemahi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
camera needed to be higher and be able move on a joystiq to work right
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 12:52AM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is this a tech demo for the 3DS?!?!?!?
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 1:52AM JBourne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great idea for an experiment. I imagine they would have had an easier time driving a smaller car with a better turning radius, but I understand that it would be more difficult to attach the camera without having access to a hitch. Maybe a Jeep Wrangler would make it simpler?
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 4:41PM Levi Partridge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A friend of mine once owned a Honda Accord with a trailer hitch.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 2:33AM JamesHks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
THIS IS AWESOME

WHY DO THEY BOTH SUCK
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 5:32AM technoKyle said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Think of them as valets."
"Why do the valets need bats?"
"GO!"
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2010 6:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is a spambot biographying Aerosmith in two different languages in the comments of a videogame website?

Also, this video combined everything I love about Mythbusters, everything I love about Jackass, and added video games.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW