| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (87)

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:04PM yoshieee said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
They can't be serious....

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:14PM NaeemTHM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm probably alone here but I don't have cable TV, just internet access.

I watch all my shows on either Hulu or similar means (like SouthParkStudios) so I never really had a need to pay an extra 30 bucks for Cable TV. That said...I don't know man I really wouldn't mind paying 12 dollars a year for quality programming.

Hell if that rumored Conan deal had gone through they would have had my money for sure!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:23PM Peter Moore said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
No, I'm with you, NaeemTHM. I don't have cable. If I could pay $2 a month to watch shows, I'd do it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:28PM NaeemTHM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Damn Mr. Moore tell EA to give you a raise brah!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:29PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would also pay for this. That's not a bad deal at all. Especially since the only available cable to me is expensive satellite or an expensive cable/isp broker.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:30PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I too lack television. This is really cheap for television, but it depends on how good the shows are/how many channels there are/however they make the system work.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:32PM WMcPete said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I too do not have cable tv. I have not had cable in my home for over 15 years. Just the internet and netflix. The main reason is, I cannot stand commercials. As long as this service is commercial free, I may use it. Otherwise, I will pass.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:35PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wouldn't mind commercials if it was like some places where you watch a single advertisement before seeing the whole episode.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:43PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
with the "digital transition" that happened in the US last year, you cant get all kinds of movie channels for free as long as you stay in an area that offers those stations, and most do....if I wasn't addicted to DiscoveryHD, HistoryHD and the like I would probably drop my cable as well
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:43PM Dr Blight said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
They have these magic things called DVR's if you don't like commercials, but I can see the general point.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:58PM Diemer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just like the first two guys I don't have any sort of subscription television. I'd hapily pay $12-$24 a year for tv stuffs directly on my 360 (on top of Netflix)
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 4:05PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can't beat $12-24 a year for tv service. Considering it's roughly 40 for extended cable a month. I just want to know if there's any sort of catch to this, assuming it's released.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 4:40PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
uhhh if its just ONE channel you can actually....thats not really that cheap....
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 6:21PM Ballistic H said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Awkward. On Kotaku, everybody agrees that this additional fee for only one channel sucks. Here, people who hate it gets voted down while those who agrees with it gets voted up.

Imo, it's really absurd that there's an additional fee when you already have ads in the Dashboard and in the tv channel you'd watch.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 6:32PM jagowar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ChrisD.... if they charge $1-2 per channel it would be a deal. Its the a la carte cable dream we have always wanted where we only pay for the individual channels we want.

I only watch 10 or so channels each month so my bill could be around $20 per month. Yet I pay directv close to $90 for 200 channels I only watch 10 of.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 7:51PM Tachyonic Cargo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The way I'm seeing this, is that it would be handled like American television distribution is handled overseas.

It would be one channel, or maybe a small handful of channels (say 4 or 5), that feature popular, first run shows from every network in it's nightly lineup.

Being that the channel(s) are on Xbox LIVE, then the shows broadcast, would be a mix of shows that reflect high interest from the early 20s to late 30s, male demographic, plus some other stuff from a list of the hottest programs currently on TV across all networks, for good measure. So you could expect a single channel with the likes of Conan O'Brian, Fringe, 24, Stargate, Warehouse 13, V, Lost, The Daily Show, The Cobert Report, South Park, Supernatural, Smallville, The Legend of the Seeker, Castle, Doctor Who, Torchwood, True Blood, Weeds, Hung, Breaking Bad, The Office, 30 Rock, The Big Bang Theory, Chuck, Nurse Jackie, Glee, FlashForward, Blake's 7, United States of Tara, How I Met Your Mother, Community, Modern Family, Parks and Recreation, Cougartown, Justified, Spartacus, Caprica, The Pacific, Psych, Burn Notice, Leverage, White Collar, In Plain Sight, Royal Pains, House, a bit of the Discovery Channel stuff . . . etc.

In the past, Microsoft has developed strong relationships with NBC Universal and the BBCA, plus Peter Chernin is formerly of News Corp (ie. Fox and FX), so one could reasonably suspect that initial offerings on the channel, would feature first-run television programing from those networks, and like Hulu, branch out to cover more networks as the channel became more popular.

Now I don't have cable either, I get all my TV via torrents. However, if such a service did exist on Xbox 360, all the programs streamed in HD, featured some form of faux (in the cloud) DVR capability and had limited commercial breaks, all for $12 to $24 per year, then even I'd be strongly tempted to hang up my bittorrenting ways for good.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:04PM Dr Blight said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Charging even more...that'll go well.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:06PM yoshieee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if anything they should lower the price
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:07PM Acosta02 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
But... it's optional, right?

I might be willing to pay $1/month for television, if the programming was good.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:09PM Dr Blight said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
If they want to add a lot of features, fine. Make these Gold level features and allow Silver access to online games.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:12PM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ 32X

If online gaming access were given to Silver members, I'm sure very few of us would bother paying for Gold. Be realistic, Microsoft is not about to let go of the cash hog that is XBL.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:14PM Dr Blight said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
They just have to make Gold more of a value for your 50 than it currently is.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:15PM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's why I shop smart and never pay more than $25 for Live ;)
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:30PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How do you get live for a year at $25?
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:39PM Temidien said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I check CheapAssGamer.com daily. Every couple of months you'll see a good deal on Live subscriptions (lately there've been quite a few) and when I find them I usually buy a couple years in advance.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:39PM Anticrawl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And Wizz before you go off on your little, "Microsoft certification process hurting the little man rant" I will have you know the 3rd party certification process fees are exactly the same for both Sony and Microsoft, down to the last penny.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:41PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Temidien

Thanks. I try to keep an eye out at CAG but haven't been there recently. I'll have to start checking more and do what you do!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:42PM Dr Blight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but things generally don't get 'lost' in Sony certification process. Notice how patches generally hit 360 last?
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:47PM Temidien said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Spike

You should definitely jump on there more often. I have a backlog of 15 A-AAA titles I got for half-price or under just from checking CAG regularly. It's a truly great community and saves me an unbelievable amount of money (being a college kid I don't have much to begin with.

I can't sing their praises enough.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:50PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've picked up some good priced titles thanks to them myself. I'm always waiting for hardware and live subscription deals. Want a couple 12 month cards and a new HDD.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:05PM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If it comes with a free week/month trial, I'll give it a shot. No reason to hate on an optional service without atleast trying it.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:07PM Dr Blight said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I think we all hated on Game Room for a good reason before it came out...
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:10PM Temidien said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not arguing that the TV channel concept isn't silly (it clearly is), just that I see no reason why we should hate on something we aren't being charged extra for (as in our regular monthly XBL rates won't go up, just for those who opt to purchase this).

For all we know, the content could be great and worth paying for. Flaming a completely optional service before any programming or pricing details are even released is pointless and childish.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:12PM Dr Blight said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Well, if it remains optional, okay. But if we're spammed with ads about it unless we pay for it, not cool.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:14PM Temidien said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Have we ever NOT been spammed by ads on the dashboard and website? I'm honestly surprised there isn't more of it.

(I swear I'm not a Microsoft apologist, I'm just very anti-flaming atm)
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 4:11PM Itchyfinger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really wish 360 would have the Adblockplus plugin like firefox.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:07PM murph17 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
MS can get bent if they think i'm paying even a penny more for XBL.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:11PM Petebot330 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You'd only be paying more if you "subscribed" to the TV channel. Unless they get some good shit, I don't really see paying for this...but who knows, maybe they will surprise...
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:17PM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You can get bent if you honestly believe Microsoft is strong-arming you into paying for anything at all.

You make the choice to pay for Live. Deal with it.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 4:02PM CobraClutch said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The people complaining about this (supposed) $2/month charge are kids who still live at home and have never had to pay a cable bill.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:13PM morric said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
My Xbox 360 already has one of those channels for watching rerun TV shows and stuff, it's called Netflix.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:18PM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Huh, I had no clue Netflix was available for $1-2 a month. Thanks for the tip!!
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:09PM Reddjoey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The sad part is if they get some D list host I won't watch, but if they get anyone good I don't want to pay for them.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:10PM ND said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they make it apart of the Standard Gold Price, I can see it boding well. But c'mon 1-2 bucks on top? Where is the incentive to switch to Gold if you have to waste more money to enjoy the perks

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, unless it's included in gold (w/o price change), count me out.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:17PM Dr Blight said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I can pick up a lot of downloadable titles for 29 a year.

Your move.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Just bring Hulu to 360, ala Netflix and be done with it. I shouldn't have to pay any more money on top of the damn Gold subscriber fee.

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:20PM Temidien said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't tell if you're dissing stoners or not. Your comment implies so but your name says otherwise....

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 4:10PM Temidien said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hurray for disappearing threads that leave my comments context-less.

Edit button, Joystiq. Seriously.
Reply

Posted: Apr 21st 2010 3:20PM HTCEVO said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Who gives a shiz if PS3 is free, MS ain't making it free....so deal. "

Wow, yea that ain't the words of a fanboy right there. You like sucking it from the source, don't ya?

"Happy gaming stoners..."

There's a great way to make me change my mind on the situation... you're just so full of class! Why anyone would want to agree and support your statement even if they DID agree with you before reading it is beyond me.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW