The US Supreme Court today announced that it will consider an appeal by California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger regarding the sale of violent video games to minors in the state. This marks the first time the federal court has been involved in a video game-related case.
The California bill backed by the Schwarzenegger has seen many, many, many ups and downs over the course of its five-year life span, going from a fledgling bill just waiting for the right signature to a chronically reputed source of frustration for the head of state; and most recently failing in California's Ninth Circuit Court. But as the governor is known to do, he returned once again, fulfilling his promise to bring Assembly Bill 1179 to the highest US court, reports Reuters.
Entertainment Software Association president and CEO Mike Gallagher commented in a press release on the Supreme Court's decision to see the case, called "Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants" (number 08-1448), saying, "Courts throughout the country have ruled consistently that content-based regulation of computer and video games is unconstitutional." He hopes that "the Court will reject California's invitation to break from these settled principles by treating depictions of violence, especially those in creative works, as unprotected by the First Amendment."
If the appeal is overturned, the law would require more stringent labeling requirements of violent games sold in California, as well as the threat of a $1,000 fine for each game sold by a retailer to a minor illegally. Historically, US Supreme Court rulings have been used to set precedent for other cases. In so many words, should the appeal be overturned, the Court's ruling could affect similar court decisions in other states. The earliest the appeal would be seen is in the Supreme Court's next term, which begins in October.
Reader Comments (64)
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 4:01PM (Unverified) said
Think about it. My son was playing Monster Hunter Tri on the Wii and it has "Use of Alcohol" as a caution because there are taverns and characters drink potions. Much of the objectionable content is seen as consequences of choices or because of the target to mature audiences in the first place.
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 5:10PM kmcroc said
the penalties of this law are harsh, but yet they forget to mention the penalties that parents will face or fail to mention a penalty for parents. thier have been many times that parents buy theses games for thier kids & when he gets in trouble they can't recall buying that game for thier kid. i say that a signature other than the one for the credit card be required so as to have proof that this parent did in fact buy thier underage child this game.if fine are going to issued then the parents should also be fine & held accountable too. (jmt)
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 6:02PM (Unverified) said
If you'd like to read more about the link between violent video games and youth violence, check out Video Games ProCon.org. You will find quotes and arguments on both sides of the debate, as well as information about academic studies done on the topic.
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 6:12PM (Unverified) said
While you do make it sound rediculous, the numerous FAILED propostions on this matter and the video game bill have nothing in common. Talk about gotcha media :)
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 6:25PM benheck said
Pretty sure I watched many R-rated Arnold movies before turning 18, and yet haven't committed any murders since.
If this law were being considered in a more conservative state it would be called "right wing insanity". But it's California, so it's "progressive thinking".
Ultimately it does not matter. Parents will STILL buy M-rated games for their kids because as long as it shuts up little Jimmy they're all for it.
All this bill does is create new fines (read: taxes) that can go into California's eternally bankrupt coffers. Unfortunately it will be retailers - not crappy parents - who pay up.
If this law were being considered in a more conservative state it would be called "right wing insanity". But it's California, so it's "progressive thinking".
Ultimately it does not matter. Parents will STILL buy M-rated games for their kids because as long as it shuts up little Jimmy they're all for it.
All this bill does is create new fines (read: taxes) that can go into California's eternally bankrupt coffers. Unfortunately it will be retailers - not crappy parents - who pay up.
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:09PM DerekUGA said
And how many millions of dollars are the state and federal governments wasting on this? I let my son, who is almost 8, play Just Cause 2 for more than a couple of hours while he was visiting with me the other day. Guess what? He was no more violent than he ever is and he went to sleep on time. Instead of going after stupid things like this, how about we create laws that disallow parents and doctors to put their children on heavy narcotics due to "behavior issues"...which usually include just acting like any little kid would.
It's disgusting to me that this country is still hung up on the censorship of music and games while families are falling apart and creating more dysfunctional children every second of every day. Music, movies, and games aren't the problem.....poor parents are.
It's disgusting to me that this country is still hung up on the censorship of music and games while families are falling apart and creating more dysfunctional children every second of every day. Music, movies, and games aren't the problem.....poor parents are.
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:18PM DerekUGA said
And how many millions of dollars are the state and federal governments wasting on this? I let my son, who is almost 8, play Just Cause 2 for more than a couple of hours while he was visiting with me the other day. Guess what? He was no more violent than he ever is and he went to sleep on time. Instead of going after stupid things like this, how about we create laws that disallow parents and doctors to put their children on heavy narcotics due to "behavior issues"...which usually include just acting like any little kid would.
It's disgusting to me that this country is still hung up on the censorship of music and games while families are falling apart and creating more dysfunctional children every second of every day. Music, movies, and games aren't the problem.....poor parents are.
It's disgusting to me that this country is still hung up on the censorship of music and games while families are falling apart and creating more dysfunctional children every second of every day. Music, movies, and games aren't the problem.....poor parents are.
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:52PM (Unverified) said
In fact, if more parents played what their children are playing and listened to what they are listening to, half the battle is won. They'll have the supervision they need and if their behavior or attitude changes, these parents will have a better idea of what's feeding the change. Of course, many kids develop values in the presence and absence of thoughtful parenting.
Reply
Posted: Apr 26th 2010 8:07PM (Unverified) said
These news were on CNN. This is not what I watched but it's related:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/education/2010/04/26/sn.0427.cnn?iref=allsearch
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/education/2010/04/26/sn.0427.cnn?iref=allsearch
Posted: May 21st 2010 7:39PM PersianSpice said
This law shouldn't pass. It's just another sign how that most parents of today are idiots that would rather make a blanket law that covers their asses instead of trying to learn a bit more about something that has been demonized by the media.
Posted: Jul 13th 2010 12:19PM Cramill said
"Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants" sounds like a game or movie...
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM



