| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (64)

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 3:53PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That would extend the review process substantially. Do you really think a lot of games are being mislabeled?
Reply

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Think about it. My son was playing Monster Hunter Tri on the Wii and it has "Use of Alcohol" as a caution because there are taverns and characters drink potions. Much of the objectionable content is seen as consequences of choices or because of the target to mature audiences in the first place.

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 5:10PM kmcroc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the penalties of this law are harsh, but yet they forget to mention the penalties that parents will face or fail to mention a penalty for parents. thier have been many times that parents buy theses games for thier kids & when he gets in trouble they can't recall buying that game for thier kid. i say that a signature other than the one for the credit card be required so as to have proof that this parent did in fact buy thier underage child this game.if fine are going to issued then the parents should also be fine & held accountable too. (jmt)

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 6:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you'd like to read more about the link between violent video games and youth violence, check out Video Games ProCon.org. You will find quotes and arguments on both sides of the debate, as well as information about academic studies done on the topic.

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 6:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While you do make it sound rediculous, the numerous FAILED propostions on this matter and the video game bill have nothing in common. Talk about gotcha media :)

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 6:25PM benheck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pretty sure I watched many R-rated Arnold movies before turning 18, and yet haven't committed any murders since.

If this law were being considered in a more conservative state it would be called "right wing insanity". But it's California, so it's "progressive thinking".

Ultimately it does not matter. Parents will STILL buy M-rated games for their kids because as long as it shuts up little Jimmy they're all for it.

All this bill does is create new fines (read: taxes) that can go into California's eternally bankrupt coffers. Unfortunately it will be retailers - not crappy parents - who pay up.

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:09PM DerekUGA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And how many millions of dollars are the state and federal governments wasting on this? I let my son, who is almost 8, play Just Cause 2 for more than a couple of hours while he was visiting with me the other day. Guess what? He was no more violent than he ever is and he went to sleep on time. Instead of going after stupid things like this, how about we create laws that disallow parents and doctors to put their children on heavy narcotics due to "behavior issues"...which usually include just acting like any little kid would.

It's disgusting to me that this country is still hung up on the censorship of music and games while families are falling apart and creating more dysfunctional children every second of every day. Music, movies, and games aren't the problem.....poor parents are.

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:18PM DerekUGA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And how many millions of dollars are the state and federal governments wasting on this? I let my son, who is almost 8, play Just Cause 2 for more than a couple of hours while he was visiting with me the other day. Guess what? He was no more violent than he ever is and he went to sleep on time. Instead of going after stupid things like this, how about we create laws that disallow parents and doctors to put their children on heavy narcotics due to "behavior issues"...which usually include just acting like any little kid would.

It's disgusting to me that this country is still hung up on the censorship of music and games while families are falling apart and creating more dysfunctional children every second of every day. Music, movies, and games aren't the problem.....poor parents are.

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:18PM DerekUGA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sorry for the DP
Reply

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 7:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In fact, if more parents played what their children are playing and listened to what they are listening to, half the battle is won. They'll have the supervision they need and if their behavior or attitude changes, these parents will have a better idea of what's feeding the change. Of course, many kids develop values in the presence and absence of thoughtful parenting.
Reply

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 8:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
These news were on CNN. This is not what I watched but it's related:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/education/2010/04/26/sn.0427.cnn?iref=allsearch

Posted: Apr 26th 2010 8:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The videogame conversation starts at 1:54
Reply

Posted: May 21st 2010 7:39PM PersianSpice said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This law shouldn't pass. It's just another sign how that most parents of today are idiots that would rather make a blanket law that covers their asses instead of trying to learn a bit more about something that has been demonized by the media.

Posted: Jul 13th 2010 12:19PM Cramill said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants" sounds like a game or movie...

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW