We admire all forms of dedication -- even the absolutely insane forms. A California steel contractor named Mike Leyde recently displayed one such type of persistence by playing a single round of his casual game of choice, Bejeweled 2, for 2,205 hours and 51 minutes over the course of three years. In that time, he collected 4,872,229 gems, earning the game's highest calculable score, 2,147,483,647, at which point the score display got really perplexed and went blank. (Check out a video of Mike's achievement after the jump.)
According to PopCap, Leyde is the first person to ever "beat" Bejeweled 2. That's one way of looking at it, we suppose. Another way of looking at it is to say that everyone else who's ever played Bejeweled 2 is a quitter. Yeah, that's right. Why don't you follow through with something for once in your life? Sheesh.
Reader Comments (88)
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 10:29AM wcarnation said
No fun! No personal time! Work only!
The Glorious People's Republic of America
Reply
The Glorious People's Republic of America
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 10:32AM LimitedVertigo said
Funny to see the usual bashing on someone's use of their time related to videogames by gamers on a videogame website.
I say congratulations to him, from one gamer to another.
Reply
I say congratulations to him, from one gamer to another.
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 11:04AM Vidikron said
@Maxwell Ash
I had the same thought. My first reaction to 92 days over 3 years was, "Damn, that's a lot!". But when you break it down to 2 hours per day I'm thinking, "Wow, i probably do that too". Not all on one game of course, I prefer to play a large variety... but 2hrs/day isn't probably too far from what I average.
Reply
I had the same thought. My first reaction to 92 days over 3 years was, "Damn, that's a lot!". But when you break it down to 2 hours per day I'm thinking, "Wow, i probably do that too". Not all on one game of course, I prefer to play a large variety... but 2hrs/day isn't probably too far from what I average.
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 1:22PM (Unverified) said
On one of my WoW characters, who I'd only played for a few months, had 22 days played on him. Had I been using him for three years, I'd have easily eclipsed this guy, and I still was going to college, had a girlfriend, etc. Putting in this type of game time as a gamer is really not that hard.
Congratulations to him though, that's amazing. I'm glad his hard work paid off.
Reply
Congratulations to him though, that's amazing. I'm glad his hard work paid off.
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 4:05PM stoneNboneCDXX said
I have over 330 days logged (This means sitting there clicking away cause the AFK timer was only 1 minute for like 7 of those years) into Runescape since It came out in January of 2001. I'm actually the 797th person to sign up for Runescape. Anyways, As long as he enjoyed what he was doing with his FREE TIME more power to him.
Also, my dad has logged over 700 hours into Fallout 3.
Reply
Also, my dad has logged over 700 hours into Fallout 3.
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:39AM Fishdinner said
Yeah, but he still has to play through the NewGame+ to get the *good* ending.
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 5:01PM TheIcemanCometh said
WIN, +1 to you sir. That was an awesome reply.
And serious congrats to Mike!
Reply
And serious congrats to Mike!
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:40AM dcfortythree said
can you save mid game in bejeweled? just wondering how he went 3 years without ever losing power.
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:59AM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said
Yeah if you quit out it stores your progress.
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:40AM Premaximum said
Over the course of three years...that means only like 12% of his time in those three years was spent playing Bejeweled. Plenty of time to do other shit.
How many days of your life in the last 3 years have you been on the internet doing useless shit? I'm sure the percentage is much higher.
Reply
How many days of your life in the last 3 years have you been on the internet doing useless shit? I'm sure the percentage is much higher.
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:52AM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said
12% us actually a lot higher than it sounds. Especially when you factor in sleeping, eating, and bathing(?).
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:49AM NaeemTHM said
http://www.thegamergene.com/crunch/2008/11/donkey-kong-kill-screen-t-shirt.png
He wins...THIS T-SHIRT!
Reply
He wins...THIS T-SHIRT!
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 10:27AM LimitedVertigo said
Why be so negative? He accomplished something no one else has and enjoyed doing it. He at least deserves a kudos, not a snide remark for having done it.
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 2:18PM RandomZero said
And what, pray tell, have YOU done to brag about, Mr. Obnoxious?
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:55AM Alexisonfire said
That score would be (2^31) -1 or the maximum value of 32-bit signed integer.
Probably one of the last times we will see something of that nature, as it will literally be impossible for people to reach the limit in such a game when 64-bit integers become standard. The max value is over 9 quintillion.
Unless they inflate the point value, of course.
Reply
Probably one of the last times we will see something of that nature, as it will literally be impossible for people to reach the limit in such a game when 64-bit integers become standard. The max value is over 9 quintillion.
Unless they inflate the point value, of course.
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 10:23AM LaughingTarget said
He's lucky it wasn't coded with a 64 bit base.
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 3:26PM killdash9 said
I recall glancing at the top of the leaderboards for some of the pinball tables in Pinball Hall of Fame: The Williams Collection (PS3 version) and finding some scores that were beyond the 32-bit signed int limit. I was impressed that Farsight had the foresight (heh) to make the scores either unsigned ints or 64-bit. Certainly, it doesn't take anywhere near as long as Bejeweled 2 did here to break the limit on those specific tables, but it's still something that very, very few people in the world would be capable of.
However, now I'm not so sure if they were really beyond the limit. I have a vague memory that it was 2.16 billion that I saw, but it's very vague; and, I may have been thinking that the limit was 2.097 billion at the time (2 GB expressed in KB is what I normally see for this value). So, maybe not. I can't check now, as I can't log in to PSN.
I wonder, though . . . given that we can see Bejeweled 2 uses a signed int for the score, can you actually get negative points in the game? Might we see a world record -2 billion score? Oh, the anticipation!
Reply
However, now I'm not so sure if they were really beyond the limit. I have a vague memory that it was 2.16 billion that I saw, but it's very vague; and, I may have been thinking that the limit was 2.097 billion at the time (2 GB expressed in KB is what I normally see for this value). So, maybe not. I can't check now, as I can't log in to PSN.
I wonder, though . . . given that we can see Bejeweled 2 uses a signed int for the score, can you actually get negative points in the game? Might we see a world record -2 billion score? Oh, the anticipation!
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 8:17PM (Unverified) said
Yeah... increase the point... intijer and stuff... ha. That would be.... crazy?
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 8:54PM Alexisonfire said
@killdash9
We wouldn't necessarily see a -2 billion score. Sure, when you look at it from a pure binary, it makes sense, but, from my experience, usually when you have an integer overflow, weird shit just starts happening, depending on the language used.
Like the entire score going blank or whatever happened here.
Reply
We wouldn't necessarily see a -2 billion score. Sure, when you look at it from a pure binary, it makes sense, but, from my experience, usually when you have an integer overflow, weird shit just starts happening, depending on the language used.
Like the entire score going blank or whatever happened here.
Posted: May 1st 2010 6:46PM killdash9 said
Actually, I didn't mean an overflow. Rather, could you rack up a lot of negative point values in the game and end up with a score that started at 0 and never went positive at all? Sure, most games out there don't deduct points, but hey, if you're going to use a signed integer to hold the score, you could feel compelled to make use of the typically neglected half of the representable values. :)
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 9:57AM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
wow.....and I thought the people that put WEEKS into CoD games were crazy
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 11:36AM (Unverified) said
Putting 2 hours a day into a hoby is "crazy" ? You post replies on this blog for close to 2 hours a day...who is crazier?
Reply
Posted: Apr 30th 2010 12:44PM Chris DPSN AggieCEO XBLThe Aggi said
I'm sure he did it for more than just 2 hours a day sometimes....not to mention that I most times comment on here while I am respawning, shitting, or on the treadmill.....
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










