| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (87)

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:04AM AramanTSG said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wait... are those Claptraps? o_0
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:47AM MrAlex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Victory (I was under the impression he was called Victor after Vegas Vic who is displayed on his screen, but Kevin is probably right) is a TV Robot, those seem to be a militarised version of the TV robot, hence the image in their chest. They are probably like a Mr Gutsy to Victor(y)'s Mr Handy.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:29PM dotzeno said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no. claptraps are MUCH cooler.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:07AM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As long as the thing doesn't crash CONSTANTLY then I don't give a damn how it looks. Bethesda royally pissed me off with its lack of support for that game after the DLC releases and left alot of people with a very unplayable game.

Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:09AM Nate Addison said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oblivion supports this argument with the bloodgrass glitch. Come on, Bethesda, step it up!!!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:02PM Reinhart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Strange I never had any crashing problems, and I have an old, old rig (PC).
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 2:31PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played this game on PS3, and frankly, I was appalled at the terrible support for numerous massive glitches. Any company that values their mark would have fixed them by now, just to make loyal customers feel valued.

But Fallout 3 was a strong enough game that I'm strongly considering a day 1 purchase, and there's 0% chance I won't get the game for PS3 eventually. I might buy it used like it did Fallout 3. I only do that if the game isn't made well.

Oblivion had a few problems too, I agree. Bethesda reminds me of the creative but lazy type. They are still making Elder Scrolls 3, just with tiny enhancements. They have indeed come a long way with the same technology, and they make good games, but there's no excuse for such quality control problems if they aren't even using cutting edge engines.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 3:35PM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I'm bringing up PC support.

I owned all three versions at one time or another [first was PS3 at release, second was 360 a few days before ps3 DLC support's announcement and final was PC GOTY off steam] and the PC was the worst. Unplayable and I've tried every fix in the book!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 3:59PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm one of those who 'borrows' a game before buying it sometimes, and since that's not really feasible for the PS3, I did obtain a PC copy before buying a PS3 version.

I found that almost all my glitches where Microsoft's fault. Errors in the way the keyboard worked. As soon as I switched to Vista 2.0 (Windows 7), the problems went away. Sadly, Microsoft loves to spit out terrible quality, knowing the solution for most folks is to actually give MS more money for a version that works. I am sure Bethesda left some glitches in Fallout 3's PC version too, though I deleted the game once I had a PS3 copy, but I also am sure many problems were MS's fault.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 5:06PM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gimboa: I'm not running vista or 7. I'm still running XP. Couldn't be conpatability issues especially when you check out both steam's and Bethesda's forums.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 5:28PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if you're running XP, then I agree, it's probably not your OS.

I had a problem under vista that google led me to an MS thread where they went on and on about how it wasn't their fault, even though if you disabled this useless keyboard thing in Vista, the problem went away and the Os had no problems at all.

XP, of course, was MS's penalty fee for people who bought Windows ME. They got it right, just as they got 7 right as far as I can tell when I bother to boot into Windows.

I an a PS3 gamer, so I hardly have a good opinion of Bethesda's quality ethic.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 9:06PM stoneNboneCDXX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would just like to throw my 2 cents into this discussion.
I have Fallout 3 on both PS3 and PC and had put over 200 hours into the PS3 version before moving to the PC version when I got GOTY edition. Before I patched it to v1.7 I was getting crashes every 5 minutes, now I can play for hours before I get a crash sometimes days. I would have to say the PC version is superior to all others if you can get it running right, seeing as you get more graphical options and the 19th/20th century weapon pack just makes this game sooo much more amazing.

*Computer Specs
Win 7 64bit
i7 920 2.66ghz
GTX 275 1792mb
6GBs of ram.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:11AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:20AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or it's a good year for game releases. Many of which I am excited for.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:23AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Every game does not excite me. Go troll elsewhere. My opinion of what I am interested in has nothing to do with you.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:28AM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think you have Spike confused with me. I'm the "upvote me please whore". Here, I'll prove it.

This game will suck but will be awesome at the same time.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:56AM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Awesome. Downvoted for my own excitement =D
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:20PM RudyHuxtable said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nonsense! I upvoted you for your constant positivity! It's a welcome change in this cruel world called the Internet.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:28PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank you Rudy! Too kind, too kind.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:13PM Phenomenology AkA Sixx Brother t said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm just as stoked as you bro!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:14PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Of course you are. You're on a Fallout trip right now!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:20PM Phenomenology AkA Sixx Brother t said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I need to find a way to manage game time to fit all these titles in outside of my day to day. I mean I have to already deal with Alan Wake, Lost Planet 2, and Red Dead Redemption releasing within a week of each other this month.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:22PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You will once you have your big ol' HDTV. Glued to your seat. Forget the necessities of life. Just go with the flow of this year's awesome releases.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:30PM Phenomenology AkA Sixx Brother t said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yeah it's going to be pretty insane. Problem is I'll be calibrating it for hours on end. You know how I am. LoL
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:33PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It's a nice TV. You can't just leave it uncalibrated.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:39PM Phenomenology AkA Sixx Brother t said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Yeah but it has so many freaking adjustments it's going to be a painstaking process. Just can't wait to see FFXIII on it. I may drool.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:40PM Spike Spiegel Humble Bounty Hun said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I want to see FFXIV on it =P
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 1:41PM Phenomenology AkA Sixx Brother t said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I know still waiting on my Beta invite. It's never going to happen though.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 9:37PM Nekki said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Get a (chat) room guys, seriously.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:14AM SmilinGoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Game of the year? very good chance.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:19AM chrisredfield31 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nope. That belongs to Starcraft 2
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:58AM HighFiveJesus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wow. Game of the year is not going to be a struggle between two fps sequels. Just like last year, modern warfare 2 was not GAME OF THE YEAR, and neither should have ODST ever been considered.

Its like you hate original ideas.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:54PM Crashwithuhk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah guys. Why do you hate original ideas? It's not going to be a followup to two FPS that fight for Game of the Year. It's CLEARLY going to be a followup to a FPS/RPG.

/s
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:15AM skary said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You used the phrase "Begs the question" incorrectly.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 7:36PM doc j said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It bothers me every time someone does that.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:16AM WC said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"My biggest concern about Fallout: New Vegas is its undeniable resemblance to Fallout 3. -snip- New Vegas looks exactly the same as Fallout 3, and at times you might forget you're playing the "new" game."

Sounds perfect. Bring it on! Screwing with success is not always a good idea. Fallout 3 with a new plot and twice the weaponry is awesome.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 2:45PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Remember that Oblivion looked dated and ran on an old engine. So did Fallout 3.

I admit, those are two of the best games I've ever played. But it's a valid beef that the technology has basically stayed still. This is a really good thing for console players who can't keep up with PCs, and I think that's what's really going on. No one should doubt this game will be a lot of fun, and no one should expect the kind of technological advancement that goes along with Mario or Metal Gear or Halo or GT. Apparently that's just not important to Bethesda. Just information to chew on.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:21AM SmilinGoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@hugo, i said game of the year, not most sales of the year.

@chris, Good point. its going to be a hard call this year no matter what, so many great games.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I'm still playing Fallout 3, and i'm certainly up for a new game. I don't mind that it still uses the same engine as Fallout 3, the only gripe i had was with the framerate, which would force you to use VATS for targeting simply because it would get pretty choppy when things get busy. So long as they can iron this out then great!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:24AM un4gvn94538 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"Are we really ready for more Fallout?"
ive been ready!!!! id still be buying dlc if there was more. they used to call fallout 3 oblivion with guns and scoff at it, SO WHAT?! fallout 3 was one of the best ive ever played! SO GIVE ME MORE!!! new vegas is a no brainer!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:29AM Alphonze said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Oh snap this is made by Obsidian? I just now realized that and it makes me less excited about this game than I previously was. I guess they have a knack to making sequels for hit rpg's. They are the ones that made KOTOR II rather than Bioware, and I thought that that game was a much less polished and overall less enjoyable game than the first...
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:51AM MrAlex said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Most of the team are from the team behind the original Fallout games.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:00PM Iwa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Obsidian is staffed by former Black Isles Studios employees. So with the lineage of creating Fallout itself, the new game is in safe hands.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:12PM LaughingTarget said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
LucasArts put a major time constraint on Obsidian that wasn't shoved on BioWare, that's why KOTOR 2 came out less polished.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 4:02PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was absolutely not the dev's fault that KOTOR 2 was broken. That was the publisher's fault. They actually noticed the game was being made far faster and better than anticipated, so decided to up their 4th quarter earnings by getting the game launched that Christmas, far ahead of schedule. The devs were damned for doing too good a job.

You can just feel the pride and depth of Kotor 2. That's why it's so annoying that the game is cut short in so many areas. It's not the dev's fault.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Crap, I got a third of the way through before realizing I'm an idiot and those are spoilers. I knew better too. Geeze, I'm stupid.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:35AM TwEE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Obsidian is also utilizing a lot of history from Fallout 1 and 2 "

I like this.

Hopefully they are better at telling a interesting original story with fallout lore then Bethesda was.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:45AM RKN said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell yes!!!!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 12:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this is where a save file migration shiukd come in, because in fallout 3, you had the option to kill harold, who was a recurring character in 1 and 2, even if he was pinned in oasis, I would think an NPC would eventuall say, " hey, I heard there is city in the capital watseland that still have life, I wonder if it's true?", then you will say, in real life, " nah, I killed him 3 years ago, it's gone,", or, " yeah, I helped him spread his seed, where all the green at?"
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2010 11:35AM Maxx the Slasher said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
What the hell? No fast-traveling? It's going to take hours (real time) to get around.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW