| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (50)

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:12PM Rususeruru said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
More importantly why do the 1.8% who said no not support R18+ ?

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:16PM Pure Black World Tendency said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Only the Kangaroos opposed this rating.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:20PM FNG said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ Pure Black World Tendency

this is exactly right. Kangaroos only live about 15 years if they are lucky
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 12:34AM ructus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe that 1.8% was your mum? ... and my mum too, knowing her ... come to think of it, why don't governments ever blame mums for people's violent behavior? They are more at fault than some stupid video game, them and fathers, right?
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 2:00AM Morisato13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would love an 18+ rating in the US and ban all kids from playing them... xbl would be so awesome...
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 9:30AM Draco84 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow dood, didn't wait to long after mothers day to start beating on them :P
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:21PM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Man, I can almost see the mature version of "Knifey/Spoony" around the bend.

Come on, Australia, do the right thing for the good of the children.

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So 98% of respondents in a completely unrepresentative, unscientific poll said they support the 18+ rating. How useful.

- Scott

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:26PM BrianH said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
there is no such thing as a scientific poll, the responses are all based on opinion.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:35PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Brian, I think you don't understand what "scientific polling" means. If a poll or survey isn't conducted on a representative cross-section of the population, or the pool of respondents aren't chosen in a genuinely random fashion, or the sample size isn't large enough, it is unscientific.

This isn't a scientific poll. According to the summary, roughly half of the respondents were EB customers, meaning they were gamers. It's like conducting a poll about whether the government should provide more social welfare, and having half of the respondents polled be homeless people.

- Scott
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:36PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Also, I love the fact that my initial post got voted down. "How dare he point out that the data gleaned from this poll is unscientific! That doesn't comport with what I want reality to be!"

Incredible.

- Scott
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 11:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Scott, while I appreciate the gesture of posting your name so nobody gets confused that Scotto doesn't actually stand for Scott I have now copyrighted this. Any further use of this will be classified as infringement and may be subject to law.

Regards

- Scott ©
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 1:48AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
So my point of view is being voted down because I have the audacity to have an acquired habit of signing my posts with my first name, from years and years of using Usenet newsgroups? This place just gets more and more mature by the minute.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 2:27AM Brodo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Your moms getting more and more mature by the minute
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:50PM DBuckEye said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Then that's a bullshit survey. I mean, if it helps the cause, great. Australia should have an R18 rating. But seriously, you couldn't get 98% of the people anywhere to agree that the sky is blue.

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:54PM Rikerbot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Of course, more than half of the participants in said poll were turned on to it by an in-store promotion at select Australian EB Games."

Because it would be a horrible idea to let the people who actually play games decide what ratings there should be for games. They're much better off letting crabby ultra-conservatives who have never held a controller in their lives decide.

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:54PM Rikerbot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
btw, I understand that the bias in selection invalidates the survey. I was just trying to make a point.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:16PM Esposch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, Neocons own all the media here except the internet, and Conroy wants to control that too.

That's the main pitfall of democracy I suppose: everyone's vote is equal, and the majority can control people's lives. Gay marriage/adoption is the best example; why should people, (incidentally the same people that control the media) that have nothing to do with the gay community get as much as a say than the people that the issue actually affects?
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:17PM Shadowbender said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree that people that are actually knowledgable on the subject of games should be in control.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 9:58PM Mr White said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let them have mature games dammit!,prohibiting an entertainment media that hurts no one to a person over 18 is just stupid.

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:14PM Foetoid said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Nothing has been prohibited. We get every single R18+ rated game from the UK let into the country at MA15+. If they are censored, its a tiny, insignificant censorship that noone would ever notice. The only exception is L4D2.

We DO get ALL the mature content, the problem is 15 year olds playing games meant for 18 year olds.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:26PM PhilipJWitow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's even funnier when I import games from the UK that clearly have an R18+ rating.

The same game here has an MA 15+ rating. Happens a lot and it's quite ridiculous to be honest. But it sure beats having to play games that have been censored.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:13PM ch3burashka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But does this mean that their R18+ bill will pass, or will the new Tech Czar shit on everyone's day, too?

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:15PM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It wasn't passed at the SCAG meeting 3 days ago due to the fact 1 attorney general couldn't attend due to a budgetary portfolio. Unless they can make the decision outside that meeting, we'll have to wait for the next meeting. Not sure when that is.
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At EB Games a large number of participants said that the lack of an R18 game rating insults their intelligence and that they are smart enough to not be negatively influenced. However they then proceeded to purchase the paperback strategy guide and DVD insurance that was offered to them.

Posted: May 9th 2010 10:38PM Roamingkat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah we will probably get the R18+ bill passed and then the goverment will turn on the Australia wide internet filter and block all of us front the dangerous world wide web. Our goverment is a complete joke at the moment.

Posted: May 9th 2010 11:28PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Michael Atkinson is not an ultra-conservative. He is a member of the Labour Party and a left-winger. Besides he as well as many other Australians aren't as worried about children playing violent games as we are about video games inspiring homocdal killers to slaughter people. So far Australia hasn't had many Columbine-esqe incidents, but the rate could rise if we do not control some of the content coming from overseas. Its not like it is impossible to obtain titles another way.

Posted: May 10th 2010 4:05AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sorry doesn't Aus have it's own movie category (can't remember the name) where the movie is basically nothing but blood, tits, and murder? Like, they're well known for it too?
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 9:37AM Tezz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what have you been smoking
Reply

Posted: May 9th 2010 11:45PM Kadamon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DA time!

Now here's a question, how exactly is the opinion poll biased?

At nearly 60k people voted, the majority of which are obviously gamers voting on an obviously gamer related poll. This doesn't have anything to do with people that don't buy videogames so their opinion would the one that would be skewed and biased since they would mostly not understand the full details of what the rating would ensue.

Besides, if the naysayers are voting against a rating for games, why aren't they voting against a rating for movies?

Posted: May 9th 2010 11:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Video-games are interactive. Films aren't. The former are far liklier to inspire violence in unstable individuals than movies.

Posted: May 10th 2010 12:08AM BananaBoat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Based on...what? Studies conducted by special interest groups that came to the paid-for conclusion that games cause more violent behavior in children than movies?

Maybe it's unfair to dump on you, but people like to make statements like this without anything to back them up. A history book covering WWII will show you that films are perfectly capable of inspiring children to commit specific acts of barbarism against specific people. The effects of propaganda films are real and documented. To claim that they aren't as bad as video games is ludicrous when there isn't a scrap of evidence to back that up.

Why am I so crabby today you ask? Finals week.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 4:51AM Tiptup300 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can stab people with forks, let's ban those. Seriously, the argument doesn't matter. You don't ban something because it may or may not negatively affect 1 out of millions.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 12:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're right. There aren't any studies to show that movies are less likely to influence violence in some people. I merely stated that interactive mediums have a better chance to inspire violence than movies which are non-interactive mediums.
I understand your mood though, I'm in finals too.

Posted: May 10th 2010 6:00AM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If youths are unstable enough to be influenced by a violent videogame, then its just a matter of time before any violent media influences them. The fact is, Australia has the most lenient game rating system in the world, with every R18+ rated UK game hitting our stored at MA15+. The R18+ rating will serve to make those violent games less accessible to youths, and therefore, harder to influence them.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 6:02AM zefur said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
By the time a child or person can actively persue killing hookers in GTA the damage would have already been done by the violent cartoons tv shows and movies that the child has been able to watch a child is more open and receptive of a non interactive media e.g. movies and such for a longer period of time then a game because they wont need to interact to watch a violent movie at 5 years old
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 8:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack?
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 1:27AM pika2000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Next, demand for small tits!

Posted: May 10th 2010 4:06AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
YAY!
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 4:15AM armageddon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not net event Australian and I support the 18+ rating, in fact it would really have no effect on me but I still support it.

Posted: May 10th 2010 4:15AM armageddon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
even =/= event
Joystiq can we please have an edit button now.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 6:46AM Snappyguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well it can affect you. You'll get 8 year olds in GoW3. I mean the few annoying ones with rap lyrics on their pillow cover.
Reply

Posted: May 10th 2010 7:23AM RedRose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is why you should come to the UK. We have no government forcing mad rules on us, though Christmas was made illegal in the C17th....

Posted: May 10th 2010 8:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it wasnt a poll just a request for submissions on a public discussion paper

http://www.ag.gov.au/gamesclassification

Posted: May 10th 2010 9:35AM DerekUGA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's so nice to see that people want governments to be our parents. /end sarcasm

Posted: May 10th 2010 10:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For the entertainment of the Joystiq readers, this is the actual report.

http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(3A6790B96C927794AF1031D9395C5C20)~R+18plus+status+report.pdf/$file/R+18plus+status+report.pdff

They actually disgarded the EB games submissions for the majority of it and it still weighed heavily in favour of the rating.

Naturally, the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia is against it, because we all know guns don't kill people, video games kill people.

On a surprising note though, the Catholic Bishops are in favour of an R18+ rating. I believe that counts as having god in favour of it.

Posted: May 11th 2010 2:47PM cisforcookie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get it. who cares? obviously if it'll get rid of censored games, I'm all for it, but I just worry about the fact that R rated movie and MA rated games have a much harder time making money than PG/PG-13 rated movies and E/T rated games. (grand theft auto notwithstanding) Will you need ID to buy an 18+ rated game? will fewer stores carry them?

Posted: May 10th 2010 12:12PM kenny goo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Props to the Australians for mobilizing and getting their voice heard (hopefully). I wish the US could do that and do it productively for just about anything.

Posted: May 10th 2010 12:59PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Report: 98% of sentient beings disagree with Rupert Murdoch.

Report: 98% of Rupert Murdoch doesn't care. The other 2% really doesn't care.

Report: 98% of Australians don't matter. The other 2% is Rupert Murdoch.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW