| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (56)

Posted: May 22nd 2010 3:37AM LunarAura said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Aw, look! Widdle Everquest thinks it's World of Warcraft. How adowable! ^_^
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 8:34PM BrokenTriforce said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I had no idea that people still play Everquest.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 9:02PM Morisato said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The last time i was on... only a single server had people on it. At peak time it was only at medium capacity. Every other server was at low capacity and a ghost town >.
Reply

Posted: May 23rd 2010 6:18PM darkfocus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
the ironic thing about that comment is that WOW was based off everquest
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 3:53AM Hoops said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
$25? In real money? For DLC in Everquest 2? Why? To impress the 200 people who don't like World of Warcraft?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 4:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Dude, that's like five $5 foot longs.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 4:18AM MrAlex said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's like five $5 anythings...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 6:53AM mtlyoshi9 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Aguiluz

Ermm.
You just killed the joke.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:52AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Actually I think he made the only funny joke.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 10:39AM PreGHz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Aguiluz

Joke killer!!!! Get him!
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 3:57AM GoldandFinal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
First it's mounts. Then it's armor for mounts.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 9:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
..... By comparison doesn't this mean the horse will be like 50 bucks... 0.0
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 9:44AM tobz1000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Bethesda covered armour for mounts long ago...
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 4:15AM Darklink2009 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, to be fair, people paid the same in WoW. It's not like WoW is inherently more valuable than Everquest, it's just a far greater amount of people agree to waste their time and money there. Can't judge Sony for wanting to try something like this.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The WoW mount you can buy doesn't give you inherently better combat abilities just for owning it.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 1:18PM liquidsoap89 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But it gives you a bigger theoretical epeen.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 4:17AM MrAlex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought you guys had already posted this but it was just in the massively news round up, sorry for doubting you guys.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 4:27AM Air King said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Doesn't look like it's worth $25

Unlike the star pony which was totally worth it
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 5:11AM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gee, I wonder where they got this idea from?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 5:58AM mrmobius said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Alternatively: Okami is $16 on Amazon. Go buy that.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 9:53AM mtlyoshi9 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Alternatively alternatively: Portal is free on Steam right now. Go get that.

Actually, forget the whole 'alternatively' thing. Just go get it.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 6:01AM Arcaria said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a former player of both games I can tell you that Everquest 2 is a vastly superior game to WoW in every way except for player population.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:00AM Emophia said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lolno
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If EQ2 were so superior to WoW as you say it is, then it would have the player base. Which it doesn't.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
The larger player base*

WTB edit button.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I've played both as well and must disagree with you Arcaria.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:56AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"If EQ2 were so superior to WoW as you say it is, then it would have the player base. Which it doesn't."

Because drunken college frat boys and middle schoolers play Warcraft. Being popular does not make something better. This was also vastly popular about a decade ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2BmcE3Slww - Hey Macarena!

I hear HPV is quite popular too. Surely that makes it good too.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 8:12AM Hank Hill said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Because drunken college frat boys and middle schoolers play Warcraft."
And I'm sure that the everquest 2 community is made up of nothing but the highest grade intellectuals, right?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 12:21PM BrianH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no, that's eve.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 12:53PM SkuddStevens said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You're all kind of dumb considering they're both practically the same damn game. :/

I'm sorry, but I'm going to wait for the real MMOs: Final Fantasy XIV, Star Wars: The Old Republic, and maybe Blizzard's next MMO IP if they ever actually show anything about it to the public.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 10:23PM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
EQ2 has a more mature audience. IE - Boring adults, wives, and grandparents. The game style usually doesn't draw in the younger crowd since it's slower paced, more group oriented, and doesn't involve ganking or PVP.

I didn't realize this was news to anyone. Kids play WoW, dorks play D&D, people with kids play EQ2, and machines play Eve.

And no, EQ2 and WoW have an incredibly different engine. Look at the system req sometime - Warcraft will run on any eMachine you can buy retail for the past 3 years.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
25$ for just 1 incredibly ugly in-game model?
daym...can't believe there are ppl out there who buying such crap...

For that amount you can easily buy a good game and would still have a few bucks left.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:58AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it worked in Warcraft, why wouldn't it work in EQ2 where the players on average are older, more OCD about collecting, and loyal?
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:33AM x Prime x said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Way to go Aguiluz.....
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:59AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
way to comment fail ;)
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 7:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is where EQ2 and WoW differ. WoW cash sold items are purely cosmetic, offering no in game bonuses or advantages over other items. EQ2 items offer an advantage against a player who does not have it.

If your going to copy Blizzard, do it right.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 8:00AM Punkrawk Bbob said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
ya. You're right, I rather pay $25 for something that does nothing. What have I been thinking all my life? I think I'll start buying video game cases instead of getting that crap that comes with a disc inside.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 9:12AM Shauk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think the point was merely that in a game where the playing field is supposed to be determined via in game decisions and participation in the game economy, they don't want to futz it up by letting richie riches come to some store, run his daddy's credit card and instantly have a badass character that surpasses what some other dude worked for in a legit "game" manner.

one played a game, the other bought a virtual barbie to take a dump all over the other person's accomplishment in the game.


at least in wow, the advantage is never given to the superficial richie riches.

that said, I tire of the MMO model. I hate it, it ruins games, it ruins the life of other genres which that game came from.

I'll eat my words if you ever see a Warcraft 4 RTS, or when fallout finally comes out with theirs, if they ever come out with a single player fallout game (shooter/strategy/rpg, that game gets around)
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2010 12:37PM Shawngs2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
^ Probably a WOW player^
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 8:42AM Temidien said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I started chuckling at the thought of people paying $25 for something so ridiculous then took a look at my gaming/collectibles shelf.

If you get $25 worth of entertainment out of an EQ2 mount, more power to ya. I wouldn't want somebody making fun of my spending habits.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 8:57AM Bearcut said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gaming collectables? LOL!!!!! Just kidding.

As an EQ1 and EQ2 Vet, EQ1 was vastly superior, simply because it was more hardcore (then again i only played it when there was only one expansion pack, and now there are like a bazillion, so who knows what it is like)

and crap like this didn't happen....

I'm going to say the same thing i always say about things like this. IF PEOPLE DIDN'T BUY THEM THEY WOULDNT EXIST. Like Bad DLC, Hookers, and crappy weight loss products. But the fact is: Hookers are fun, some people will buy anything for their favorite game, and most americans will do anything to lose weight.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 9:55AM mtlyoshi9 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While I agree that it's quite possible some people will get more value out of this than they could potentially get out of a console game that wasn't to their liking, I guess the aspect that's ridiculous is how little effort Sony had to put into releasing this and how much money they'll get in return for it.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 11:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@mtlyoshi9 Blizzard put about as much effort into the star horse. They had already made the model, they just put a different skin on it.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 12:05PM BrianH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
welcome to the norm.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 1:01PM ch3burashka said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
[FINAL WARNING BEFORE BAN]
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 1:03PM Enosoma said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Maybe now you'll all shut up and stop downvoting me when I bitch about ridiculous DLC.

Or maybe not.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 1:49PM Blaquebeird said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Being a whiner won't make us like you more. It's science.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 2:54PM Enosoma said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I wasn't expecting the internets to like me. I've got cats for that.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 1:04PM drunkenpandaren said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope people do know that EQ2 has been doing microtransactions long before WoW and that these mounts are only usable on Station servers.
Reply

Posted: May 22nd 2010 3:15PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Train Stations?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW