| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (67)

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:33AM cylet said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
please don't make it 250 like the psp go

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:35AM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

Yeah, but this will be worth $250.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 1:39PM HandheldAddictblogspotcom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, I'd bet it'll MSRP $250.00.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 2:43PM Nekki said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

There haven't been any specs revealed so far, so how can you conclude it's the same as a PSP??
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 6:24PM Brodo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)
Im guessing $229.99
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:40AM jeffm227 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
i estimate not below 200 for sure
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 1:40PM kenny goo said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@ CaptainProtonX

No offense, but half of the games announced so far are ports, and spec wise this thing is barely more powerful than the PSP-3000 that sells for $170 (a price that Sony makes a profit on). IMO $250 is by no means a justifiable price point.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:37AM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I recognize the cost of development, and the expectation to make a profit.

Try buying an iPhone without a contract. BAM...$700. Cost of production? Not even half of that. Maybe not even a third.

I'm going to call $250 just because I'm convinced it will be worth it.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:40AM Churchbus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
When I read the title, I thought it meant one of two things:
1. The 3DS will be pretty expensive.
2. The 3DS will be less costly to produce than expected.

Seems like it might be a bit of both. Most companies (i.e., Sony) would take a bit of loss on the hardware so it will sell, and make profits on the software.

Nintendo, on the other hand, knowing full well that people will buy the 3DS regardless, chooses to make profits on everything. It's a move you can afford to make when you create something people want.

Everyone else should take note.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:41AM knighty said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I think this is yet another case of greed on Nintendo's part. Fair enough, it's their product, it's totally up to them what they sell it for, but bearing in mind the shovel loads of money they'll make on software, it seems not only greedy of them, but bad business wise. Surely it'd be better to get it in more peoples hands and recoup extra money on software than to put it out of the price range of many people?

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:47AM TwEE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@knighty

"bad business wise. Surely it'd be better to get it in more peoples hands and recoup extra money on software than to put it out of the price range of many people?"

Didn't they disprove this the last few years?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:50AM Haywire said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That strategy presents greater risk for Nintendo, but probably not greater rewards. This console is impressive, as is its lineup, and people will buy it at a profitable price.

Also, I wish people would stop criticising companies for being "greedy". It's capitalism, and if their being greedy means making great products so people will pay a lot of money for them, that's a good thing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:57AM shaurz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@knighty Nintendo are greedy for trying to make a profit? This is nonsensical. They're not a charity. Loss leaders are a bad thing for the industry.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:00PM AwesomeTown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@knighty

Nintendo doesn't have the financial backing that Microsoft and Sony have through other products. They can't afford to take a chance and lose money on a system.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:05PM knighty said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
But it's not really a case of taking a chance is it? Come on, we all know Nintendo will make an enormous profit on software because the main reason people but Nintendo systems is because of Nintendo games. I agree that it's up to them what to charge, I said that, I'm just saying I think it would be *nice* of them to charge a bit more reasonably based on their profits. I know I'll get downvoted into oblivion for this anyway but whatever, that's my view. I know they're not a charity, but I think it's sad that in this world there's so few *nice* companies. *sigh*
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:24PM Raffi256 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I think Nintendo realizes the value of setting the right price point
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:41AM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, if it's over $200 I'll just wait.... might be for the best since we all know they'll release a considerably better version a year later anyway.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:44AM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo could sell it for $100 over production cost, if they wanted.

Anything Nintendo touches = Money Printer.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:51AM orionzdrm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze Most of the time but when it comes to 3d they have some fails in the past.... Like Virtua Boy...
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:47AM crazypeng1 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
i'm not buying 250 for a 3d gimmick that may hurt my eyes. Nintendo still prides themselves on being the most affordable, so stick to that idea.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:15PM Alexisonfire said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@crazypeng1
"i'm not buying 250 for a 3d gimmick that may hurt my eyes."

250 3DS's is a bit excessive.

But would you consider buying only one?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 9:05PM CJLopez said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@crazypeng1 you could always, i dont know, turn off the 3D and still enjoy pretty awesome games on the go!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:49AM knighty said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I'm not sure a handheld priced at the same amount as the Wii would prove the same. Anyway, regardless of whether they proved it doesn't stop me feeling that it's cheeky of them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:48AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Nintendo can afford to make less of a profit off this thing. They've still gotta be making a killing on the Wii.

Of course, that's a consumer talking. We always want the lowest price. I don't want to have to wait for years just so the thing can drop to a price I'm willing to pay since I'm a stubborn and frugal person.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:50AM knighty said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
It's good to see the comment system is still broken. Let me write your software joystiq, please ;(
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:50AM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
200 bucks better mean they'll push out software for it. Good software.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:28PM MystileArmor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@One Stomy Night go watch it

Where you in a coma during Nintendo's presentation or something?? Or are you insinuating Ocarina Of Time in 3D and Starfox in 3D wouldn't be good enough?

I mean, I'd be willing to buy a 3DS at 200 dollars for just those 2 games. If they'd not release a single game after those two, I'd still be content.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 4:29PM Alexisonfire said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@One Stomy Night go watch it

If you are meaning at launch, then I will agree. Most games do not look ready for a prior-to March 2011 launch. I would think that Kid Icarus and Star Fox 64 would be the only interesting titles to be released.

If you are talking about the line-up in general, ARE YOU BLIND?!?
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:51AM Jeff Kibuule said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
My guess is $179.99 for the 3DS, $139.99 for the DSi and finally $99.99 for the DS. A good $40 separating each console allows Nintendo to keep selling them all at the same time. I have no doubt that the DS could be sold for $99, and I doubt there's really much value in the DSi compared to the 3DS, but it's probably nice to keep it around anyway.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:03PM HeroicPrinny said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jeff Kibuule

$180 is also my hopeful guess. Keeping it in the hundreds would probably be the safe bet to sell to the masses. Many parents will probably just see another DS and be appalled by too large of a price increase.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 7:09PM xxxsam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jeff Kibuule My guess is $200 and drop the DS when stocks run out. It's confusing - they really don't need so many products in the market. So it'd be 3DS, DSi XL, and DSi.

If they launch it in March for $200, to sell to fans, they can probably afford to drop the price a bit for Christmas to sell to (still relatively rich) parents.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 11:56AM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm going to call $200 even, but no more than $250, though Reggie implied that 3DS costs a lot more to make than DSi

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:00PM helix91 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm gonna guess that it will cost about $230. The 3DS technology has got to cost a pretty penny, so I expected it to be quite a bit higher than the DSi.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:01PM Toxic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As Michael Pachter said it would be about $299. I think that the actual price will be close to this point, maybe $249.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:09PM Aquaryon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Toxic For Once I hope Mr. Pachter is wrong, I am hoping for $200 - $230 personally.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:20PM McBrick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo is a "nice company" - the question is, who are they nice to? Their stockholders and employees (meaning - maximize profit) or their customers?

Companies that do not maximize profit typically don't stay in business very long. If you'd like to make a point, don't buy the thing.
Reply

Posted: Jun 22nd 2010 4:46PM zochmenos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And how do you think people get paid at Nintendo? Charity?

No one would deny they make TONS of money, but much of that leaves in salaries, taxes, research and development, etc.

Sorry to say, but your point of view betrays your age.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:08PM Shiaoran said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Likely"? Why would they want to sell it for less than what it costs them to make each unit?

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:15PM r4in said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Shiaoran

That, sir, is a good question! We should ask Microsoft or Sony for an answer to that question.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:43PM BobTheElephant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Shiaoran

Companies often lose money on their console(hardware) with the idea that it will convince more consumers to buy the product and they will each buy more games(software) to overcome the loss in profits on the system.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:47PM Shiaoran said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Shiaoran Yeah, Sony did that with the PS3 and had hard times. But I don't think that's something Nintendo would do. They don't need to do that, their hardware and software can justify their cost.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:14PM AmericanNinja said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
$300 you heard it heard first.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:16PM Raffi256 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Regardless it'll show up on ebay for $5000.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:17PM r4in said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Imagine if Nintendo had not announced the 3DS just a few weeks before E3 like they did.. Imagine if they dropped it during the Nintendo Keynote with that software lineup already in place.

I might have soiled my armor I'd have been so scared. =)

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:20PM r4in said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@r4in

P.S.

How fantastic would it be to get all dressed up in Middle Ages chain mail with the sword, gloves, boots and helmet to match then walk into a bank to make a legitimate withdraw on your account? I'm going to do that sometime.. =)
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:42PM MystileArmor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cool story bro.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 1:49PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@r4in

They were forced to, as they knew a leak was imminent, they had to announce it on their terms, or have the potency of the announcement neutered entirely.
Reply

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:23PM Faenix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find myself puzzled when this happens, feels like we went back in time xD

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:26PM erh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo should know that price has been a major factor that has played in their favor, in DS vs PSP and Wii vs 360/PS3, all the way back to GameBoy vs Sega Game Gear. Most parents are very price-sensitive when buying "toys" for their kids - especially a portable game system that the kid has the potential to lose or break! Nintendo would be stupid to raise the price.

Posted: Jun 21st 2010 12:38PM Benstamania said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm guessing 190-200....but IMHO 200 seems like it would be to high...from a Nintendo standpoint.

I think 200 is reasonable based on everything it does but I'd be surprised to see it sell AT 200.

190 is a decent bet IMHO.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW