| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 12:56PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I JUST WANT TO DANCE!
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:38PM BigE4284 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 4:21PM Dao Jones said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:03PM PlatinumSkeet said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"all the songs in the game are unlocked, right away

Day 1 purchase....
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:08PM teteroto said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@PlatinumSkeet

I'll take DDR over this any day.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:23PM Guess Who said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@teteroto Very different games. DDR isn't so much about dancing as it is about how fast you can move your feet. This is actual, you know, *dancing*.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:27PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@teteroto

I'm curious why DDR seems a lot more appealing.

I don't want to be a music snob and say that the DDR soundtracks are awful, but I will say that Harmonix clearly invested a lot more cash into licensing songs that have broader appeal. Also, the DDR soundtracks are awful.

On the surface, a game that tracks full body movement seems a lot richer than a game that tracks one of four preset foot positions.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:34PM Raffi256 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
DDR was cool 10 years ago.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 2:59PM xxxsam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Copa: DDR historically had better songs (...not all of them, some were crap) because it used to mostly avoid licensed music, and didn't go that heavily into cover versions either. You got music from Konami's in-house musicians (several of whom were great) and when they did have licensed music it was often from relatively obscure dance acts, because they could license it worldwide for about 50p. Sure there were also cover versions, which were mostly ill-advised, though on occasion these were better than the original by far (there's a Britney cover which is great).

With more modern music games, they use licensed music, which tends to mean it has to be something people have heard of. That's bad news in a dance music game because almost by definition, 'real' dance music is something you haven't heard of. What's your favourite dubstep tune? Come to that, name *any* dubstep tune? If you're really into dubstep probably you can, but I can't, and I'd still like some dubstep tunes in a dance music game please.

So that's why DDR generally had better music - because they didn't (couldn't afford to) go for pop hits people would recognise. But I think in this case, it's a dance-ING game and not a dance MUSIC game. In that case it makes more sense to use shitty pop tunes of the 'hey, at least you can dance to it' variety - the sort of tune that probably had a choreographed video in the first place. Let's face it, who does fancy dance routines to Dutch hardstyle? (ok this is probably an invitation for youtube links proving it, but I mean, in general)

So my vote for this game is, license some crappy, but highly choreographed, J-pop / K-pop girl group songs! Oh wait it doesn't support 48 players...

Aaaanyhow, I suspect DDR will probably still be the purer game experience (you get into a flow which is an awesome feeling - I really suspect in Dance Central you will basically have to memorise routines, which isn't the same)... but DDR gameplay is probably not even financially viable as a major video game any more. And Dance Central looks hella fun, providing the technology works well, which it sounds like it will.

Still not planning to get one (don't want to get a whole new game system, not sure how well Kinect will work with my computer monitor setup) but I'm certainly tempted. If I had a 360 this would certainly be the Kinect killer app for me - I'd get it for sure, and without even the slightest intention of buying any other Kinect game except, er, Dance Central 2 when the time comes.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:07PM BigE4284 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fist Pump
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:08PM One Stomy Night go watch it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can I turn the camera around? That could be a selling point.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:13PM Themoreyouknow said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Marco le Polo

Hm, a dancing game...I'm pretty sure the target audience is ladies and gay men.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:23PM Marco le Polo said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I wonder if your comment is going to get removed too because it has the word "gay" in it...

It's teh gheyness.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:26PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Themoreyouknow

Ladies love a man that can dance. Ladies do not love you.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:45PM Themoreyouknow said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Marco le Polo Meh, people are too sensitive. If they wanna remove it b/c the word "gay" is offensive, I pity them.
Reply

Posted: Jul 1st 2010 2:41AM Marco le Polo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Themoreyouknow Ok ok I read the ENTIRE interview and I sold. Where they're coming from in making this game is really interesting. I love singing in Rockband so perhaps I'll find myself shaking my hips to this. The question is who am I gonna serve first?
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:15PM WiNGSPANTT from TopTierTacticsco said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Sounds good, though the decision to go for gender neutral dances will probably limit the creativity that would have been possible for 2 separate routines, including even paired dances for 2 players!
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:15PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like they've really put a lot of thought into this in their typical Harmonix way. I'm definitely interested, but it's not worth $210 (Kinect + game) to me, so I'll have to find a cheaper way if I'm going to buy it. That's a huge hurdle to overcome.

Kinect needs at least 1 other stand-out game to help defray the initial cost (2 games for $270 - $135 average- is much better than 1 for $210), and hand-waving menu navigation isn't enough of a draw. We'll see what the future holds.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:34PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@aristokrat

It does seem like a hefty price tag, but it's actually very comparable to Sony's Move price point when you take into consideration all that you might end up purchasing. The entry fee for Move is a nice 50 bucks, but that's just for one Move controller. I would be buying the sub-controller, the camera, and at least another Move and sub-controller. It really depends what you want I think. They are in competition with each other, but they offer different things.

Move looks very cool, but I already have a Wii. For me, I can do without HD graphics. I'm not buying a whole new slew of peripherals for my PS3. I've bought enough Wii stuff already. Just buying a camera for the 360 is a lot more appealing to me. Like I said, they offer different things to different people.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 2:10PM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Uncle Jesse
I'm not saying I'm getting Move either, just that in-and-of-itself this is how I view the Kinect pricing situation.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 3:38PM swooded said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@aristokrat
Are you saying Kinectimals isn't a day one purchase? What kind of Gamer are you?!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 4:17PM Shadow 024 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@aristokrat
Although the price has appeared on different sites as $150, the major nelson claims on the latest podcast that it's just a placeholder untill the actual price is announced. I wouldn't be surprised if it is around $150, though.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:16PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's those legs again..
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:17PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze Also, you should be able to 'serve' people online.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:25PM teteroto said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kinect needs to make sex games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 1:26PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@teteroto That's how Microsoft cracks the market in Japan.

Sex games with Kinect support.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 4:03PM Cypher FDP said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The E3 presentation didn't exactly encourage me to buy this...
Reply

Posted: Jul 15th 2010 10:17PM ZeroPayn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Cypher FDP
When they first started off showing the game with the girl dancing, it caught my attention. As they started to go through what the game was and how much work Harmonix put into it, I really started to get interested. The main selling point for me, however, was when the stereotypical nerd-looking guy who was telling you about the game actually got up himself and danced. I didn't see that coming. So far, this is the #1 game that is nudging me to buy Kinect.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 5:00PM Dao Jones said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it me or is Naoko Takamoto the coolest producer ever?
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 8:45PM matthargett said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't wait to play this on PS3. I hope a PS Eye/Move version gets released soon after the 360 version. (I know the skeletal tracking libraries from Sony need work, but they'll also need a developer to iterate on it with them!)

Will this have HD audio since there are less music tracks to mix/stream at once?
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 9:56PM ybfelix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Somehow everytime I see the dancing guy in second pic I want to punch him.
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2010 10:13PM pButter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Has anything been anounced about a CAW system?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW