| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (57)

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:00PM c0bra95 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
*Looks at calendar* Nope, it's not April 1st. Huh? Weird if true.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:02PM rajendra82 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Last year at E3 Jack Tretton said, "PlayStation 3 will be the only console you'll be able to play Final Fantasy XIV on, in 2010". Now that it has been delayed till 2011, will XBox 360 owners have to wait till 2012 (unless they play it on PC instead)?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:07PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@rajendra82

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/06/22/square-enix-in-talks-with-microsoft-for-ffxiv-on-xbox-360/

Hiromichi Tanaka explained that while the MMO is currently only slated for release on PS3 and PC, the company is "still talking with Microsoft about an Xbox 360 version."
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:10PM ZexionArmando said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@rajendra82 at Johnny

Actually, I believe the talks have ended, and since LIVE isn't open enough as compared to PSN and PC, there won't be a 360 version.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:25PM Ballistic H said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
http://kotaku.com/5572356/final-fantasy-xiv-on-360-doesnt-look-likely

"We couldn't come to an agreement on Xbox Live."

It won't come to 360.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:25PM Chyld989 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@ZexionArmando

Source?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:26PM Chyld989 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Chyld989

Balls, as I was reading the comments someone posted the source. Ignore my post(s).
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:31PM Elranzer said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Maybe he meant the PS3 beta.

The delay is probably due to the Xbox 360 version. Just like with FF13.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 5:16PM Dustin F said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Never say never when it comes to console exclusivity.

Never say never.

And really, who cares? It's not a first party title either way.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:02PM Helghast102 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That CE looks amazing :O
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:04PM ZexionArmando said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Is it sad that I am more excited for the artbook than the game? Well... I do love Amano's work... FF to Vampire Hunter D... Mmmm...

lol Maybe I should get this.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:07PM Zertoss said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The radiation output of the PC of September of 2010 is a tad dangerous, so you'll all need to wear these protective Garlond Goggles.

*equips Hazmat suit*
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:09PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I wish the PS3 version was out sooner. But, this will give me a chance to figure out if I even want the game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:15PM elperron2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't wanna be a troll but...

was anyone else disappointed with Final Fantasy 13 besides me?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:17PM ZexionArmando said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@elperron2 lol

No, no I was not.

But I kept my hype for the game low, and got what I expected, a decent, but fun FF game. It's no VI/IX, but it's solid and very fun. I guess people were expecting too much out of it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:32PM Elranzer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You're not the only one. Worst in the series, in my opinion. Even worse than FF2, with its SaGa-style leveling system.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:34PM RickGhastly said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ZexionArmando Considering how long FF13 took to be released, I'd say relatively high expectations shouldn't have been entirely out of the question.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:39PM UnverifiedUser said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ZexionArmando

I agree. Too many people bashed it for being different, but it was nowhere near a bad game. I loved the gameplay, the characters were solid and it was an interesting take on the RPG series... I liked the new turn it took... a turn based action RPG.

Of course, its not better than the best in the series, namely FFXII, FFIX or FFVI, but its certainly better than most games out there.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:43PM Bluebreaker said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@elperron2

I have to put this out there:

Nope. I was satisfied with 13.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:43PM doubleyewdee said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@elperron2 I wasn't disappointed, I was downright insulted.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 5:03PM Indefinite Implosion said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@elperron2
I wasn't disappointed, but it just didn't live up to my expectations.
Wait...
What I mean that is that while it had flaws and wasn't as good as I've come to expect from a Final Fantasy game, I still enjoyed it and played it for ~120 hours.
That said, from what we've heard of FF Versus XIII (world map! airships!), that should be the game FFXIII should've been. (I hope)
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 6:04PM DokiDokiBawanga said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@elperron2 i like FFXIII it's not perfect but it's not bad ether. In my opinion it's a best J-RPG in this gen . (yes i think it's better than ToV)
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 9:52PM Alterin said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@elperron2 I wasn't. I loved it. In fact it's the first Final Fantasy game ever where I didn't 75% of the game bashing a button for the combat just to get through it as quickly as possible because it became tedious.
Reply

Posted: Jul 1st 2010 2:45AM elperron2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@doubleyewdee

lol
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:20PM WPstart said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Didn't they once say that they are hoping for the PS3 version to be free after the initial purchase? I don't like how they've made the MMOs part of the numbered series but will play XIV if it means not having to pay monthly.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:25PM wormania said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@WPstart
There is no way they'd have a subscription on one and not a subscription on the other when you're on the same servers etc.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:33PM Elranzer said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They never said that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:53PM WPstart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Elranzer I was half right. Sony had been in talks with Square about the ps3 version possibly having a free-to-play model like they're trying with other MMOs. It was just a comment made from a Square employee at E3 09 so probably was nothing to take seriously.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:20PM Spookimitsu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
argh, so i only have a couple of months to finish building this PC huh.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 8:15PM Marco le Polo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Spookimitsu

You sound like a couple of months ahead of me.

I can't even run the benchmark yet. Slowly, but surely.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:21PM Shiaoran said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sad thing is, people will pay the monthly $13 just because of it's name, making the devs not think of a better price to lure in people with common sense.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:27PM ZexionArmando said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Shiaoran lol at least it won't require PSN+ to play.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:33PM Elranzer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully the delay isn't due to PSN+
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:41PM Nobledevil Gaming Optimist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Shiaoran

I'd rather pay $13 for the number of hours of joy that game will give me than buy a different game every month for $30-60 (okay, so I'll probably do that too, but you get the idea).

And people aren't paying just because of the name or because they are the fools you have convinced yourself they are - they are paying to play a game that will (hopefully) keep them entertained for months or years and showing support for future updates and content.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 5:05PM Lagunamov said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified) MMOs in general are made purposely to keep players playing for a long time, either by making the level up system slow as hell, or by giving you virtual "prizes" for stuff that ultimatelly doesn't matter. Multiplayer or not, I'm not gonna pay subscription for a game that I already paid for. If they want to charge subscription, then make the game download only, so people would download it for free and THEN start charging them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:32PM Nobledevil Gaming Optimist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm disappointed in the lack of a soundtrack with the special edition, though. I love Nobuo Uematsu and consider him one of the very basic reasons why I enjoy video games to begin with, so I was very much hoping for a music CD to go along with FFXIV.

Oh well, it's not a deal breaker. I will happily get this day one.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:37PM Misfit Toy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

Agreed. But you know how these FF games are. The real soundtrack will be 4 discs long or something.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:38PM Sylath said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
What, no one is going to say anything about that Eorfee line? Come on, that was good stuff. Nice one, Ludwig.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:40PM ZexionArmando said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@RickGhastly Thats the only problem was development time, but the hype was pretty rampant, both from Square and it's fans. But still, while very poorly written and executed, it was decent and the combat is honestly the best the franchise has ever had.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:41PM ZexionArmando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ZexionArmando Damn, reply fail. They need to fix this, lol.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:44PM doubleyewdee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As an alpha test I just cannot believe this Sep. 30th release date. Really? Less than three months and the game isn't even in beta? This is gonna be one hell of an UGLY launch.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:57PM Bronxchulo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
seriously why so long for the PS3 version?

wonder if i can do the same thing i did with XI. Get it on the PC and play it until the PS3 version comes out and then just get the PS3 version and use my info/chara already in the system.

I still cant believe there's a 6 month gap between the PC launch and the PS3 launch. XI on PC was only like 1 month (maybe 2 cant remember) ahead of the PS2 version.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 5:57PM DokiDokiBawanga said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@maxxgold yeh yeh troll harder
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 5:59PM DokiDokiBawanga said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't wait to play it. too bad i already decided that i will be playing it on PS3. besides my PC not so powerful. interesting what makes PS3 version so late?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 6:08PM bca360 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 6:30PM CyberAly said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
THIS IS TERRIBLE! I'm using a Mac! I could install windows via Bootcamp and try running it, but i'd SERIOUSLY be crossing my fingers.

If I do wait for the PS3 version, all my friends will have 6 months on me! DAMN.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 6:46PM kenny goo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My philosophy is that unless you're Blizzard, you don't have the right to charge more than $10 a month for an MMO, but fair enough. Good news for Sony that they got this locked down on PS3 for the time being. Kinda sad Microsoft cant get their shit together in the MMO space. Within a year Sony is gonna have four major MMOs on the PS3 in DC Universe, FF 14, The Agency, and Free Realms.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 7:56PM Otimus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@kenny goo
Blizzard doesn't deserve to either.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 9:04PM kenny goo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Otimus

Well they sure as hell have enough people paying for it. I mean, I don't think it's worth it, at all, but 11+ million people do. To each his own I guess. My point was more that no one comes close to them in the MMO space as far as installed base in concerned, so I don't think $13 a month for FF 14 is justified.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 7:57PM Terical said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even though I have no desire to pick this game up, I can say about time Square Enix got the graphics and specifications done right for PC, hopefully at least. Look at the first Final Fantasy Online game, the game was ported off of the PlayStation 2 (Japan's PlayStation 2) console's hardware specifications and graphics; yet one would need mid to high pc to play it. Hopefully they have done testing with the current rig set ups out there, before turning it down for the Playstation 3 .
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW