| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (38)

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 9:51AM Triscuit said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Pretty funny! But it begs the question: WHY THE HELL IS SETH GREEN IN A HIGH SCHOOL LUNCH ROOM?! Dude, Seth, you're straight up ASKING for a pedo charge.

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 11:16AM gevenstaines said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Triscuit
you must be the pedo. it's obviously just a cafe.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 11:38AM The Nth Doctor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Triscuit

He's reprising his role as Oz?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 2:27PM monster215 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@The Nth Doctor
Oz was the best.
Reply

Posted: Jul 2nd 2010 8:05AM DeanXeL said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@The Nth Doctor,

shortest comebacks ever.

That was Oz.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 10:25AM DarkeSword said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ahahaha, I wasn't expecting her to take his advice.

Nice.

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 10:44AM Jack Spicer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Airborne's Seth Green"?!?

Seriously, "Airborne"?! Not "Robot Chicken", not "Family Guy", not "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", but "Airborne"?

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 10:45AM Jack Spicer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Jack Spicer

Not even Mass Effect's 'Joker'?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 11:22AM Quinreisen said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Jack Spicer

It's called an obscure reference of sorts. Seth Green is known for them throughout his shows such as Robot Chicken and Family Guy. I'd think he would take it as homage.

Not to mention joystiq does this quite a bit, throwing blasts from the lil known past about subjects. Nothing to get bent out of shape about. Please go and hug your Seth Green stuffed animal until you settle down ;)
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 11:24AM Lerkero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jack Spicer
I don't even know what the hell Airborne is. Maybe that was intended to be a joke?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:13PM Victor Ruthless said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jack Spicer Not "Without a Paddle"?? Wait, what?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:19PM Liquidfingers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jack Spicer

Seriously! What in God's name is Airborne?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 1:18PM MacGyver10 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)
only the best surfer dude who moves to the cold north, gets picked on and made fun of but then gets his old rollerblades in the mail and becomes instantly cool after tackling the devil's backbone and pwning the high school douche jock movie ever!
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 10:46AM TheGrandHero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can't help but question if spending part of one's advertising budget on the Twilight audience for an old-school-style dungeon crawler is the best decision. Granted, maybe I'm wrong and this drives the game's popularity up among that demographic, but... it's kind of a niche series here in the United States.

Maybe if they'd highlighted the slash fic possibilities in the ad... Hmm...

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 11:00AM Veko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheGrandHero
Correct me if I'm wrong but that commercial isn't aimed at cute girls. It is aimed at nerdy guys who like cute girls.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 11:38AM LokeSTL said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Shouldn't be too hard to sell to tweens anymore. Didn't they change the tried-and-true battle system over to a mindless button masher, and the characters built into a story to a make-your-own random character customization. Sucks when something so original and great has to change for a few extra bucks. Well, at least we still have DQ I-VIII...

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:03PM zerokku said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

"Well, at least we still have DQ I-VIII..."

And how is DQIX's "make-your-own random character" any different from say Dragon Quest III?

How was the battle system changed that much? Besides the fact it has multiplayer, and involves some movement, its still the same thing.

And this is published by Nintendo, which means it'll be cheaper than the "square-enix tax" that we would have had otherwise.

TLDR: You're an idiot.

Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:21PM LokeSTL said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@zerokku

I had quit reading about it years ago when they announced that IX would have action combat. Reading a few articles to respond to your ugly post, I now see that they changed their mind and went back to the traditional turn-based combat. Looks like I might purchase it after all.

Custom characters is an annoying "western" element. The more customization you have in a game, the more detached the character becomes with the story.

Stating my opinion doesn't make me an "idiot", even if I was misguided. Is it necessary that you be a jack-hole instead of just pointing out my mistake?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:22PM carmaction said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@LokeSTL

I am in full agreeance with zerokku. If you think a game should NEVER change then you should just stop playing them immediately. It's ironic to go to a gaming NEWS (I don't know how to underline things for emphasis) and complain that the game has to much new stuff in it.

I don't want a game that's just like DQ I. To shoot down your ridiculous arguement even further, every single DQ has a different gimmick in it that is nothing like it's predecessor's. I hate you.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:32PM LokeSTL said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@carmaction

1) Where did I say that a game should "NEVER change"?

2) Your new-NEWS arguement is poor. One can come up with new information about an old game and it is still NEW to everyone.

3) Look up "irony", you have completely missed it's meaning.

4) Every DQ has a different gimmick that DOESN'T CHANGE THE BATTLE SYSTEM. The fact that the system is still traditional makes this a purchase for me.

5) Don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 1:20PM gatotsu911 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@LokeSTL
Yes, because Dragon Quest's "Attack, Magic, Item, Defend" battle system is still at the pinnacle of innovation and quality gameplay, and should not ever be changed AT ALL. In short, this series should not be brought into the 21st century.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 1:33PM LokeSTL said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gatotsu911

There are no new battle systems in the 21st Century. The only "innovation" in gameplay has been motion and stylis gameplay. The rest of the elements of the genres are just being traded around. The systems of battle are still the same. Action combat is just as old as turn-based combat. Just because you and game reviewers don't like it doesn't make it unlikable. There are still millions of us who search and buy them.

And "quality gameplay" is a matter of opinion. In my opinion, the original FF & DQ are a much higher quality of gameplay than the newest games in their series. There is a reason why these games have such a long series life, an it's their turn-based menu combat.
Reply

Posted: Jul 1st 2010 11:58AM gatotsu911 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@LokeSTL
I'm sorry, but you need to wake up. You can like the old games all you want, but the fact remains that the traditional menu-based RPG combat system is unbelievably repetitive and shallow. At least some other modern RPGs offer some semblance of strategic depth. The menu-based combat system has persisted in SPITE of Dragon Quest's maturation as a series, not because of it. There's just no sensible reason to fault a large company for attempting to innovate a game to appeal to more than the small, ultra-hardcore group of gamers who think the only games worth playing were on the NES.
Also, just to clarify, I'm not in any way against turn-based combat systems - in fact, I love 'em - but I do applaud DQ for attempting to move beyond the shallow, four-option combat system it's had in the past.
Reply

Posted: Jul 17th 2010 10:28PM Metatron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@LokeSTL You aren't an idiot. You are simply ignorant and myopic.

First:
Customized characters = diminished story.
FALSE. What a ridiculous opinion.
Changing the character's gender, hair color, height has absolutely NOTHING to do with the story. Play a bioware/Black Isle/Bethesda game, they all have stories+immersion that blow away the trite fantasy stories you're used to.

Second, your fanboy traditionalism, is a blight on the stagnant, stale industry that is Japanese RPG's. People like you are the reason JRPG's haven't taken any of the latest tech advances, to improve themselves beyond graphics upgrades and longer cutscenes.
You claim to want a better story, but what about better gameplay? You pay 40-60 dollars for games. Not long movies. Story is important, no doubt but action games are capable of more immersion in said story. Look at Bioshock.

This game may have evolved the series like Final Fantasy XII attempted but, JRPG fanboys of both series, have proved to be the least welcome to change. You want the same thing over and over.
"It just isn't the DQ/FF/JRPG without _____"
F*** you. You don't get to decide what makes a game. The creators do.
It's whiny fanboys like you who turn potentially great, innovative titles into "me too's"

The game is a lot of fun, I just find guys like you infuriating in your lack of creativity.
Reply

Posted: Jul 19th 2010 10:00AM LokeSTL said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Metatron

Now you've maid the mistake of assuming that the only games a play are JRPGs. FALSE. I play everything, including Dragon Age, Sacred 2, Oblivion, etc... Those are fine for holding me over, but in comparison are just not as good. That's how opinions go. I like this, you like that.

I have no problem with new IPs adopting whatever battle systems match the game. I have a problem when existing, long loved franchises are forced to change to adapt to cater to the whining of "potential new customers". All while alienating the existing fanbase. See the FF series for reference.

I'm just not some douche that thinks all games need to be the same sloppy story with a button mashing battle system. You won't see me on the BioWare boards complaining that their battle systems aren't turn-based. Before you start throwing around words like fanboy, you might want to take a look in the mirror. You sir, are a WRPG fanboy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:22PM masterinsan0 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This smacks of 1990-style Nintendo advertising to me, stripping the "Japanese"-ness from the game so us dumb Americans will buy it and pretend we made it, because we're too self-centered to like anything made by any other country.

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 12:35PM Dr Perry Ulysses Cox said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@masterinsan0

. . . or you could be reading into it WAY too much. Or that. Right?
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 1:35PM gatotsu911 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@masterinsan0
Or, maybe different markets have different tastes, and advertising is meant to be aimed at the widest audience possible instead of a specific niche audience who will buy the product whether you advertise it or not. Maybe that too.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 1:55PM MrAlex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He's right about westernising it, I really hate how the East thinks that the West have less interest in their games because of their settings/styles.

It's the fact that the quirkyness that makes Eastern games good is often hidden behind poor tech and clunky fighting that makes the experience ultimately not fun.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 1:50PM andrewpoe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually liked the Japanese ad a lot better -- it's more simple and more effective. Plus, it's funny -- dude nearly drowned and his buddies are playing DQIX. It sells the product and has a situation memorable enough for the viewer to associate the game with the ad.

Seth Green's ad could be used to sell phones, cars, appliances, banks....it just so happened to sell a video game. It's too generic. I would think someone seeing the ad would be turned off from purchasing the game if they went by the girls' reactions.

If Nintendo really wanted to appeal to tweens, they would have gotten those kids from Twilight to be in the ad and play up the 'are they dating or not?' relationship with Robert Pattinson and Kristin Jackson. She gets mad because Robert has the new DQIX. She then gets her own copy and they are closer again....

This is why I don't work in advertising and get paid the big bucks....

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 2:24PM blahblah55 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People are looking too hard into these commercials.
Please understand people that the general populace doesn't deeply observe commercials. To them, they're small clips that either spark their interest or make them change the channel/make them keep walking.

Go ahead and go Westernization this and that, the fact is: It's a commercial in the US. And Seth Green is in it. It hardly means that tweeny boppers are interested - it means that people who like Seth Green go like "OMG! Seth Green!". But considering the fact that he's more of an obscure character compared to any other celebrity you could put up there, he fits more into the rather odd and random commercial.
Of course it isn't like the Japanese commercial. The Japanese commercial feeds to the Japanese audience. The commercial itself is a weird commercial to watch - most Western general populace wouldn't "get it" despite it being rather simple humor. They don't "get it" because Dragon Quest doesn't appeal to us as it does to Japan. If you replaced that group of men with celebrities, we'd find it too odd - too out of character. If we replace them with just anybody, we'd still find it too odd - and think it doesn't appeal to us. All-in-all, it's a commercial for them, not us. (if however, you're talking about gamers finding it more interesting, a commercial like that would fit more into random gaming blogs and video sites that aren't advertised anywhere else: WHICH IT ALREADY IS)


All-in-all: Chill out, if you're already interested in DQ, you know you're already getting it despite the commercial. For those who don't know or don't care: There's Seth Green. . . for some reason.

Posted: Jul 1st 2010 4:22AM BrokenTriforce said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@blahblah55

Maybe Squeenix liked the FFIV sketch in robot chicken that they chose him specifically for the commercial?

If you haven't seen it, do yourself a favor and watch it.
http://www.gamespot.com/users/someguy503/video_player?id=JHU7kTH65bsFsjHZ
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 3:09PM xshinox said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that was so random. was he suppose to be one of their friends or just sitting in the same table as them?

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 4:51PM Bluebreaker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They could of just had him playing DQ9 like Nicole Kidman played Brain Age, Carrie Underwood with Nintendogs and Beyonce with Rhythm Heaven.

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 5:46PM blahblah55 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Bluebreaker
It seems men have to do more than just play games in order to sell a game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 30th 2010 7:11PM delicatessen lama said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Both those advertisements are hilarious. Personally I wish my television had Japanese advertisements on during ad-breaks, because they kick-ass. I barely watch television anymore thanks to furniture shop ads with people yelling. Yes I do use the mute button, but I have just had enough of that garbage. I know what shops I won't be buying from in future and I don't give a stuff if their advertising is paying for the program I'm watching.

Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:34PM EvoHelix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If that Japanese video aired as it is in the US I would buy the game on the spot.

Also, the hybrid Final Fantasy/Dragon Age music in the background was interesting.

Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:35PM EvoHelix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@EvoHelix Crap *Dragon Quest
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW