Medal of Honor beta to be extended for Xbox 360 players
33
Patience is a virtue, and nobody knows that better than the Xbox 360 owners waiting to experience the Medal of Honor beta. "Unfortunately, we have experienced a delay with the beta on the Xbox 360," said executive producer Greg Goodrich in a recent press release. "To the Xbox 360 community, we say thank you for your patience. We are working to fix the issues that have caused this delay."
EA said that it will extend the beta period to compensate for the Xbox 360's late addition to the program, though it's still unclear just when all the technical difficulties are expected to be resolved. Those who pre-order the game -- the only way to gain access to the beta on Xbox 360 -- will apparently have "ample time to play and provide feedback."
Medal of Honor deploys to the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 on October 12.
EA said that it will extend the beta period to compensate for the Xbox 360's late addition to the program, though it's still unclear just when all the technical difficulties are expected to be resolved. Those who pre-order the game -- the only way to gain access to the beta on Xbox 360 -- will apparently have "ample time to play and provide feedback."
Medal of Honor deploys to the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 on October 12.
Reader Comments (33)
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 1:17PM ii Stryker said
@MLC I'd say from the issues the PS3 was having , i.e. system crashes, it is truly Beta code. MS probably requires the code to be more reliable and "Demo" like and less beta like
Reply
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:21PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@Thumpthis
They patched the freezing. I hadn't froze since they patched it up. But, problems should be expected as it is a beta / test version not final code. They do these to get feedback on all the problems. But, the freezing is done and over at least because that was annoying.
Reply
They patched the freezing. I hadn't froze since they patched it up. But, problems should be expected as it is a beta / test version not final code. They do these to get feedback on all the problems. But, the freezing is done and over at least because that was annoying.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:18PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
Probably the same freezing issue the PS3 version had before the patch. I have no problem being very vocal about my admiration for this game. :ahem: this is the best / most fun multiplayer fps I've ever played. It's like mw2 and bfbc2 had a baby. There are things that need to be fixed I.E. bullet lag, grenade range, knife range, stopping power etc ... but the thing I really love most is that you truly can't camp in one spot as you will be found and killed.
I absolutely love this game and I'm not even that good at it.
Reply
I absolutely love this game and I'm not even that good at it.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 1:28PM ii Stryker said
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell So it doesn't feel like it should've been a DLC expansion for BFBC2?
I love BFBC2, and I'm afraid that MoH's multiplayer was not going to feel like a stand alone product and more like it should've been DLC for BFBC2.
How does the respawning work in team assault versus mission?
Reply
I love BFBC2, and I'm afraid that MoH's multiplayer was not going to feel like a stand alone product and more like it should've been DLC for BFBC2.
How does the respawning work in team assault versus mission?
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 2:47PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@ii Stryker
Feels completely different when compared to BFBC2. The way it respanws in the team deathmatch mode is basically whatever spot on the map your team is holding, it'll respawn you there. In the mission mode you respawn behind enemy lines close to the nearest objective or I believe you can respawn on a squad mate.
It has that battlefield look to it in some ways but it certainly doesn't feel like battlefield. Everything from the upgrade tree to the character classes feels completely unique. You can play team deathmatch without vehicles or I'm assuming with vehicles when the full game launches. Similarly to MW2 it has it's own rewards as in killstreak rewards like a UAV, Match ammo, mortar strike, rocket strike etc ... you have to sort of expose yourself to do the various strikes unlike MW2 which balances it out a little for me. Also, you can't camp because every part of the map is accessible by multiple avenues.
In my opinion it just feels perfect. As I mentioned it has some balancing issues but it feels like it plays faster than Battlefield and more run and gun type of shooter. I didn't at all get the impression that I was playing a modified version of Battlefield, more like something new that took traits from both battlefield bad co and modern warfare and combined them. There are destructible things in the environment but not everything is destructible and it really punishes people who don't stay on the move. You also can't pick up weapons or anything from a fallen opponent.
I don't know ... it's just feels really good to play and totally natural.
Reply
Feels completely different when compared to BFBC2. The way it respanws in the team deathmatch mode is basically whatever spot on the map your team is holding, it'll respawn you there. In the mission mode you respawn behind enemy lines close to the nearest objective or I believe you can respawn on a squad mate.
It has that battlefield look to it in some ways but it certainly doesn't feel like battlefield. Everything from the upgrade tree to the character classes feels completely unique. You can play team deathmatch without vehicles or I'm assuming with vehicles when the full game launches. Similarly to MW2 it has it's own rewards as in killstreak rewards like a UAV, Match ammo, mortar strike, rocket strike etc ... you have to sort of expose yourself to do the various strikes unlike MW2 which balances it out a little for me. Also, you can't camp because every part of the map is accessible by multiple avenues.
In my opinion it just feels perfect. As I mentioned it has some balancing issues but it feels like it plays faster than Battlefield and more run and gun type of shooter. I didn't at all get the impression that I was playing a modified version of Battlefield, more like something new that took traits from both battlefield bad co and modern warfare and combined them. There are destructible things in the environment but not everything is destructible and it really punishes people who don't stay on the move. You also can't pick up weapons or anything from a fallen opponent.
I don't know ... it's just feels really good to play and totally natural.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:20PM ysdarkfact said
It still sucks you have to preorder the game in order to play in the beta. What's the point?
Reply
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:22PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@ysdarkfact
To generate interest. They'll probably do an open beta or demo closer to launch.
Reply
To generate interest. They'll probably do an open beta or demo closer to launch.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:54PM LockeDaemonfire said
@ysdarkfact
Well, unlike a demo, the main point of a beta isn't really to let people try it before they buy it. It's more about testing, and people who care enough to preorder it are probably more likely to care enough to send in info about bugs and whatnot. It can also be an incentive to preorder.
Reply
Well, unlike a demo, the main point of a beta isn't really to let people try it before they buy it. It's more about testing, and people who care enough to preorder it are probably more likely to care enough to send in info about bugs and whatnot. It can also be an incentive to preorder.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:37PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@Dr Acula
Not true at all. It's what modern warfare should have been.
Reply
Not true at all. It's what modern warfare should have been.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 2:49PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@Dr Acula
Absolutely. I've been playing it every night. In my opinion it's more like modern warfare and battlefield had a baby opposed to a straight up cod clone. Just my opinion on the matter but it feels so perfect to play. It's the most fun I've ever had in an online shooter ... even more than horde mode in gears.
Reply
Absolutely. I've been playing it every night. In my opinion it's more like modern warfare and battlefield had a baby opposed to a straight up cod clone. Just my opinion on the matter but it feels so perfect to play. It's the most fun I've ever had in an online shooter ... even more than horde mode in gears.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 3:28PM Emokitteh said
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
I agree, it's been a blast so far. There are obviously issues that need to be corrected, but for a beta with only two modes and two maps (one map/mode), I find myself coming back to it everyday. Maybe once it's released retail I might get tired of these maps...
Reply
I agree, it's been a blast so far. There are obviously issues that need to be corrected, but for a beta with only two modes and two maps (one map/mode), I find myself coming back to it everyday. Maybe once it's released retail I might get tired of these maps...
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:43PM TheOtherJames said
They must need more time to work on the facial hair physics engine. They wouldn't want to insult the beard by making the simulation of it sub-par.
Reply
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 12:49PM ZeroHour682 said
Mark my words. This game will NOT be release in 3 months. I'm thing Jan 2011.
Reply
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 1:48PM Quinion said
@ZeroHour682 I would mark your words, if they had even PASSABLE grammer....Here's what you meant to say in english:
"This game will NOT [be] release[d] in 3 months. I [am thinking that it will launch closer to] jan 2011" I fixed your comment to make it readable now
Reply
"This game will NOT [be] release[d] in 3 months. I [am thinking that it will launch closer to] jan 2011" I fixed your comment to make it readable now
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 3:30PM Look At This Suit said
@Quinion
I think you meant "grammar".
Jackass.
Reply
I think you meant "grammar".
Jackass.
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 1:04PM MoFoMadness said
Im curious to know as to whether, due to me buying Bad Company 2 and was meant to get my beta a few days before everyone else, the 17th of june, will my beta be extended the alotted time
Reply
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 1:47PM Axcalibur said
I was going to pre-order this, then I saw the price. $69.99 for a game? forget that (same reason I'm not buying Crackdown 2). In both games cases, I'll be waiting for a price drop to a more reasonable, sub-$50 price point.
Funny thing is, I was going to avoid the new COD:Black Ops like the plague due to the ridiculous DLC price points, but it's releasing at a more reasonable $59.99 - maybe it's worth some re-consideration. I can just skip the DLC like I have with Modern Warfare 2.
(side note - the prices are in Canadian)
(second side note - Happy Canada Day)
Reply
Funny thing is, I was going to avoid the new COD:Black Ops like the plague due to the ridiculous DLC price points, but it's releasing at a more reasonable $59.99 - maybe it's worth some re-consideration. I can just skip the DLC like I have with Modern Warfare 2.
(side note - the prices are in Canadian)
(second side note - Happy Canada Day)
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 2:05PM baby sea tuna said
No thanks, EA. I was already sick of this game 6 months ago when it was called Modern Warfare 2.
Reply
Posted: Jul 1st 2010 2:20PM Gco said
I didn't preorder anything and got invited to the beta from EA a couple of days ago, to my surprise.
Your person moves like it's from BFBC2, but the perspective and shooting and score tallying looks and feels just like MW2.
For coming up with a concept, I wouldn't bet against having the best of both worlds, but in practice...it just feels completely unoriginal. There's no reason why I would buy this over Black Ops this fall..at least from my impressions of the beta.
Reply
Your person moves like it's from BFBC2, but the perspective and shooting and score tallying looks and feels just like MW2.
For coming up with a concept, I wouldn't bet against having the best of both worlds, but in practice...it just feels completely unoriginal. There's no reason why I would buy this over Black Ops this fall..at least from my impressions of the beta.
Posted: Jul 14th 2010 12:35AM JEKYLL 2000 said
Great game except for the delay between explosion and debris. but i guess thats what betas are for.
Reply
Posted: Jul 14th 2010 12:37AM JEKYLL 2000 said
i was like dang 70 bucks then i saw the prices where canadian lol
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments











