| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (54)

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 1:53PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze *myself included.

I'm not nearly so brazen in real life!

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 1:54PM Rakeesh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love his choice of words. It leaves open the possibility of opt-in specifically for extra features.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 1:56PM Deschain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was about to send this in.

GJ Blizz

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 1:59PM MrCassian said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Smart idea. Was Blizzard drinking from Kodick's "batshit crazy" wine glass for a minute?

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:05PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MrCassian

For a minute? You mean "ever since they merged," right?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 1:59PM Alexisonfire said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Good. I was really, really concerned that someone was going to get on the bad side of some sort of creep and end up being stalked, harassed, assaulted, or, inevitably, worse.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:06PM Rakeesh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Alexisonfire
But that happens anyway. Remember the guy who hunted down a stabbed a person he didn't even know because he beat him in a game?
Or how about the guy who stabbed another in an internet cafe he tracked him down to?

Neither had access to their RL names, but still found the information they needed and used it. It really isn't that hard in a globally connected world.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:12PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rakeesh

It can happen without names, so why don't we just go ahead and make it easier by giving stalkers everybody's name!!!!???

But no.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 5:28PM gonintendo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rakeesh right, but it's MUCH easier to do that with someone's name.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2010 4:30AM PlasticRat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Acosta02

From what I recall, in both of those cases the victim volunteered information about himself to the attacker.

At least everyone has the OPTION of protecting themselves through anonymity, whether they choose to use it or not.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:00PM SirUrza said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze You clearly didn't read the story about the forum moderator on the World of Warcraft forums who had all his personal information found online shortly after this mess started.

Posted: Jul 10th 2010 4:19AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SirUrza
Which was amazing
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:01PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze
STFU n00b!

..this comment brought to you in the spirit of no real names being used on the net.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:02PM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not suprising, given the 1500 page forum thread on the U.S. forums filled with people threatening to leave the game if this change took place.

Blizzard needs to remember that they are answerable to their players. The only reason anyone in that company has a job right now is because players have decided that Blizzard games are currently worthwhile. As soon as that is no longer the case, they move on to something better and Blizzard begins a decline.

Take note, other companies.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:02PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@SirUrza
He clearly didn't read that? I don't see where in his comment he addressed that issue at all. Relax.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:05PM R Planteer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze
@Duke
Its clear that he didnt read it by his response, Duke. Stuff like this always hurts legitimate people far more than those its designed to protect against.

Social engineering/people tracking is something you learn if you take network security classes, and the very first piece of info you start at is always a persons name. This was a bad idea with no redeeming characteristics: Its circumventable by trolls and harms honest users.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:06PM EngineF said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Looks like Bobby didn’t appreciate having his wife and daughters’ personal information posted on the internet.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:08PM Rakeesh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SirUrza
From my understanding, it wasn't in fact the Blizz employee's information, but another person by the same name who wasn't affiliated with Blizzard. Or did I read some misinformation?

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:08PM Cleric said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have a feeling this was the plan from the beginning, so they could be like 'look guys, we listen!'. they were never going to do it.

Posted: Jul 10th 2010 4:33AM PlasticRat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Cleric

Damn dude, when you're done with that hat let me know, I need to bake some potatoes.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:09PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@R Planteer *A victory for anonymous douchebags and hard-working, honest people everywhere!

There, sheesh!

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:11PM Killimus2188 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't say I didn't see this coming. But I didn't see it coming as fast as it did.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:12PM Duke said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze
I know that it can cause a lot of problems for innocent people too, of course. That doesn't change the fact that this is also a victory for the douche bags to be able to hide in forums where they are known to be a little over the top. That is mostly what it was about - people fighting to stay anonymous - and not for security reasons.

He gave a light hearted response that most of us are thinking whether admitting it or not. I don't think he needs to be scolded for it.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:12PM RyanS said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Kickass!

Now nobody will know that my real name is Cack McChinBalls. Oh sh--

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:15PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze

"He gave a light hearted response that most of us are thinking whether admitting it or not. I don't think he needs to be scolded for it."

I agree! Lighten up!

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:15PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze Oh, and, shit.. no wonder they dropped the idea.

http://asnowstormbyanyothername.blogspot.com/

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:22PM ticklefist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they caved.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:28PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze Also, I'd just like to state that I do think the idea of displaying your real name on a forum being mandatory is a bad idea.

There's too many crazy, unbalanced goddamn people on the internet. Remaining anonymous should always be an option, even if anonymity is sometimes what breeds douchebagginess.

I'd rather not come home one day to find my dogs hanging from a tree or something because I owned some fool in Warsong Basin.

All kidding aside, I'm glad they dropped it. I don't necessarily agree with the idea of creating a website to disclose personal information of Blizzard employees. That was a bit much.

Posted: Jul 10th 2010 2:07AM NickNameless said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze
"I'd rather not come home one day to find my dogs hanging from a tree or something because I owned some fool in Warsong Basin."

I think the most ludicrous part about that implication is that you would actually have to worry about such a thing.

I'm not saying it wouldn't happen. I'm not saying it couldn't. But that we should have to worry about such a truly horrendous thing puts such little faith in humanity, and I think it says a lot about how we view our fellow man.

If so many felt compelled to decry such a system, perhaps it's in our best interest not to implement it now. Not because the system is refutable, but because we simply aren't ready.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:39PM Lerkero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't understand why Blizzard even decided to do this in the first place.

If they REALLY wanted to get people to be less "trolly" on forums they should have linked Battle.net accounts to Facebook and Twitter accounts (or other powerful social mediums). Now that would have been something to witness.

Why couldn't blizzard just use real first names or first name and last initial? Some variant of an ID that links you to a specific name. I don't really care either way, but if I were force to be Wayne R on Joystiq what's it to anyone else?

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:41PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Lerkero I would assume that you were Lil' Wayne and ask for your autograph.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 5:31PM gonintendo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Lerkero the conspiracy theory was that blizzard had plans to start its own social network,
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:40PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Brockobama123 Could we get some examples of how Blizzard 'rapes' their players?

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:50PM BrianH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze

seriously, i agree with Ezio.

I mean for fcks sake, there are 12 million people playing WoW, the chances that one crazy mofo is within driving distance of you is pretty big.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:58PM NeoCloud said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze

I'm sure you wouldn't be calling people douche bags if you had to use your real name.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 2:59PM Acosta02 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze

Just off the top of my head, how about the Starcraft II "Trilogy?" Seems kinda suspect.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 3:05PM Morph156 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjWFZPJZTxU

Seriously, did nobody at Blizzard think "Hey guys, this might be just a little crazy"?

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 3:07PM Calcographer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Huzzah! I'm happy to hear that Blizzard still listens.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 3:07PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@NeoCloud That is why I included myself in the follow-up to my initial post.

I imagine most people on the internet wouldn't act the way they do, if their real names were displayed...

...myself included.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 3:09PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Acosta02 A little suspect, sure. But RAPE?

It's either release the entire multiplayer experience (the important part of Starcraft), and one single player episode, or finish all the single player episodes and delay the whole thing another few years.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 3:13PM Ashitaka said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I can't believe nobody has posted this yet.

I'm sorry (not really) for hijacking the first post but you HAVE to see this xD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NgAkWxcPBE

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 3:19PM swooded said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@NeoCloud
He pretty much said that in the first response.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 4:21PM context said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So? we are not going to implement a shit feature right away but we will be using it for all our future games and expansions? So what we are doing is just slowly adding a shit feature! Now admire us an praise us. (bitches!)

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 4:28PM LockeDaemonfire said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Brockobama123

The thing is, just because all three single player portions of Starcraft II fall under the same name, doesn't mean that they are three divisions of a single retail game. They will each probably have every bit as much gameplay as the original Starcraft. I think the original had 30 missions across the 3 races, and I really trust Blizzard enough to have around that much content in each of the games coming out.

Also, I don't agree that all games should cost the same price. I hold many Blizzard games dear to my heart (SC, WC3, DII) and each one is worth 10x of most of the junk that's out there. It's not based on how much people are willing to pay, but how much content is there and how much they cost to develop. The best games out there shouldn't have to be priced the same as shovelware that is thrown together with a minimal budget. But they do, and the trilogy is, I think, a legitimate way to get around that.

Blizzard's expansions have traditionally been complete reboots of the games, and I feel like these will be the same way. I haven't played WoW, but for instance, LoD added alot of content to Diablo II, in addition to the all the content they added through patches for free. So while superficially they may seem like they don't add much to the original game, I expect that each release will shake up the whole game in a big way. Not just in the single player experience, but in the multiplayer as well.

Anyway, all I'm really trying to say is that the amount of content that will be in the game(s) is worth it. Though I'm not still not too happy with the merger, I've had nothing but good experiences with Blizzard games, and I trust them to still make the best games I've ever played.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 4:31PM MarkcusD said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I understand why they had to cave, but I thought it was a step in the right direction.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 4:48PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This was a triumph. That is all.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 5:04PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@LockeDaemonfire

" I expect that each release will shake up the whole game in a big way. Not just in the single player experience, but in the multiplayer as well."

Wow, a (presumably) full price expansion pack? Where do I sign up!?

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 5:23PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If Blizzard really wanted to get rid of trolls, you'd think they'd start banning people instead of implementing a system that won't actually accomplish anything but make people change their tactics. Instead of straight forward flaming, say hello to miss-manners rules lawyering and passive-aggressive sniping!

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 5:48PM Falcon6 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Brockobama123

Name the last Blizzard game that did that.

Posted: Jul 9th 2010 5:52PM Ordeith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blizzard could just connect it to steamworks instead of trying to reinvent everything.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW