Rumors have been flying around about a subscription-based Call of Duty game for some time now -- Activision boss Bobby Kotick loves the idea, because he loves money, and the company's other subscription-based game, World of Warcraft, is quite the cash-printing machine. So why not go down that road?
Many still believe Activision will, including Janco Partners analyst Mike Hickey. With the publisher's plans to break into China and Korea, Hickey told IndustryGamers he sees Call of Duty as the perfect platform for accomplishing that goal and strengthening ties with NetEase, the online powerhouse of the Chinese market. "We expect the Company [NetEase] could extend their relationship with Activision Blizzard, by establishing an additional license to operate Call of Duty Online in China and Blizzard's unannounced MMO, which will likely leverage their Battle.net platform," he said. "The eventuality of COD in China could bring an additional +$50 to +$100 million in sales and +$0.15 to +$0.30 in EPS in its first year of operation." EPS, to clarify, is short for "earnings per share."
Who knows what's in store for the future, but for now, rest assured: you won't ever have to fork over extra cash to play Modern Warfare 2 online.
Reader Comments (36)
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 10:53PM Hawaii Jeff said
@Wiizer
YES!! totally agree.
Soo sick of all these FPS sequels. It's definitely stifling development of other types of genres/games.
Reply
YES!! totally agree.
Soo sick of all these FPS sequels. It's definitely stifling development of other types of genres/games.
Posted: Jul 31st 2010 3:50AM daytripper said
@Wiizer
This shit won't fly. Unless COD becomes a MMO no one is going to pay to play.
Reply
This shit won't fly. Unless COD becomes a MMO no one is going to pay to play.
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 10:36PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said
@Altairio I'm pretty sure it would.
Reply
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 10:53PM den69 said
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze
You can't just assume that all sales of previous COD games would count as sales for COD Online.
I personally think it would not be half as popular as they assume. People would just find a cheaper, better FPS to play.
It isn't hard.
Reply
You can't just assume that all sales of previous COD games would count as sales for COD Online.
I personally think it would not be half as popular as they assume. People would just find a cheaper, better FPS to play.
It isn't hard.
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:08PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said
@den69 I think you're seriously over-estimating the decision making abilities of your average Call of Duty fan, those of which that make up the vast majority of CoD sales, and have none of the blind hatred for Activision that most of us 'hardcores' do.
If they charge for Call of Duty Online.. they will make a fortune. It's not hard.
Reply
If they charge for Call of Duty Online.. they will make a fortune. It's not hard.
Posted: Jul 31st 2010 12:59AM sigma8 said
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze
Many of those same non-hardcore people are not going to understand WTF is going on when the game requires them to set up a recurring monthly payment. I also wonder how the twitch community of CoD will mesh with the grindfest, community-oriented mentality of the MMORPG.
Also, you think it will sell like hotcakes just because it's Call of Duty? What about the Sims Online? That was The SIMS for crying out loud. The most moneymakingest franchise ever... And the MMO version tanked. I'm not saying it will definitely fail, but there's factors you need to consider. It's not an auto-success.
Reply
Many of those same non-hardcore people are not going to understand WTF is going on when the game requires them to set up a recurring monthly payment. I also wonder how the twitch community of CoD will mesh with the grindfest, community-oriented mentality of the MMORPG.
Also, you think it will sell like hotcakes just because it's Call of Duty? What about the Sims Online? That was The SIMS for crying out loud. The most moneymakingest franchise ever... And the MMO version tanked. I'm not saying it will definitely fail, but there's factors you need to consider. It's not an auto-success.
Posted: Jul 31st 2010 2:44AM Genaldar said
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze My roomate loves CoD multiplayer, he's on like his sixth cycle of MW2. He went through 5 or 6 in WaW and the same for the first MW. He's already tired of Activision charging so much for the map packs so he won't even buy the newest map pack. And when I told him the rumor that they wanted to charge to play online he said "How is Bad Company 2?". People may be dumb, but they're also cheap. Almost everyone I knows who played MMORPG quit when they started charging $15 a month instead of $10.
Reply
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 10:36PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 10:41PM ZexionArmando said
And in their next payment plan, Activision will require your bodies and souls to play MW3, lol. Which they spent 2 weeks making.
Reply
Posted: Jul 30th 2010 10:59PM GuardianLegend said
It'd be cool if COD Online had territorial control on a big seamless scale.
Reply
Posted: Jul 31st 2010 12:07AM jimplayercoop said
You guys realize that this is the MMO Blizzard is working on, right?
Reply
Posted: Jul 31st 2010 2:25AM Catalyst691 said
@The MARIO
Yes. And play all the modded, hacked, laggy, etc. games you want.
Reply
Yes. And play all the modded, hacked, laggy, etc. games you want.
Posted: Aug 18th 2010 4:44AM Catalyst691 said
@The MARIO
I'm not saying that COD: Online won't be hacked. I'm just saying that almost every game I play online on my PS3 (Killzone 2, MOD2, etc) are all heavily modded by the community and almost no fun to play. You get what you pay for. Anyway, back to Halo 3 :D
Reply
I'm not saying that COD: Online won't be hacked. I'm just saying that almost every game I play online on my PS3 (Killzone 2, MOD2, etc) are all heavily modded by the community and almost no fun to play. You get what you pay for. Anyway, back to Halo 3 :D
Posted: Jul 31st 2010 4:55PM buzski said
I hope they try implementing this and the gamer community boycotts future call of duty games, I will be partaking in that boycott. I refuse to pay 60 dollars for a game, then pay 40 bucks for xbox live, then pay another fee just to play an fps. Subscription to WoW is one thing, cod is a different story.
Reply
Posted: Aug 1st 2010 1:26AM WGD BATMAN said
Check out my opinion on my youtube video plus I have better facts as well! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZF2xKjiN0jE
Reply
Posted: Aug 1st 2010 2:42AM ticklefist said
Stopped reading at analyst, read the comments, had to go back and make sure this was all pure speculation from a source with absolutely zero credibility, and it was.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments










