| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (22)

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:05PM ShadowXOR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I prefer Omega.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:06PM Rocket Raccoon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Holy passive-aggressive post, Batman.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:16PM Foetoid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game just keeps looking better and better. Do Want!
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:26PM Iroquois said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like a rather retched hive of scum and villainy.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 3:20AM Cleric said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Iroquois
Teddy Bear Junction?
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:45PM SpiderKnives said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Actually, considering our knowledge of the universe consists of very little, our planet is actually one of the only known planets to have terrain diversity, and that's due to the fact Earth is very well balanced between its electro-magnetic field and equator, and with a great wobble relative to the sun which allows it to have awesome things like a diverse climate and, as a result, a varied eco-system and multiple terrain types, pockets of heat and pockets of frost, jungles mere miles away from desolate sandy tundras and such. This, in turn, allows life as we know it - carbon based, symbiotic and really large compared to single cell organisms, which are the likeliest form of life to be discovered in known space. On the other hand, We are not aware of any none-Earth planet which has more than a) powdered metals and rock and b) polar ice caps. Some planets are like noxious gas soup, like Jupiter, with what is probably an eroded, sandy surface. So, as far as you and I can tell, and with a loose reliance on induction and Occam's razor, and none-theoretic perspective of planets, I'd say it is, as far as humanity knows, more likely that planets with any form of atmosphere to be mostly uniform, except for around planetary poles, where planetary matter is identifcal, only behaving as it would with significantly lower temperatures, and perhaps under magnetic influence.

ASTROPHYSICED, BITCH. That's like lawyered, though slightly less likely to get you laid.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:47PM SpiderKnives said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives ...omg tl;dr
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:54PM Themoreyouknow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives
cool story bro
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 12:29AM Iroquois said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives
SCIENCE!!!
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 5:34AM Blif said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives
Damn it, that's what I was going to post.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 5:59AM rayne117 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives
I didn't read your post but does it explain why some planets are only cities on the entire landscape? It has something to do with the gravatational pull of Omega XII, right?
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 1:51PM Aerothorn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives The problem is that your argument says that such uniform planets shouldn't have life. These ones do.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 3:55PM The Nth Doctor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives This still doesn't remove the problems with planet-wide cities.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 4:38PM ArtificeDrake formerly known as said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives
HA! You spelled "identical" incorrectly. You're clearly an idiot!*

*Please note that this reply is made in jest as I realize that anyone can make a simple typo and Spiderknives clearly is not an idiot. Thanks :)

Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 5:10PM enriquein said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives You know, this always bothered me about Star Wars in particular. It's good to finally have an answer that at least souns logical and scientiffic. I like how in Mass Effect they tried to disguise the "planetwide city" by mentioning that you were just visiting an area of interest in the planet.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 10:24PM SpiderKnives said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@The Nth Doctor well, planet-wide cities are not exactly a natural\scientific phenomenon, so I don't understand what's the point of mentioning this. I guess those planets should have a significance in galactic affairs and a fairly even climate all around for populating an entire planet.
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 10:44PM SpiderKnives said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@PlayLoud well, Mars is a desert planet (albeit red). It may be too cold to be habitable, but warmth requires from an ozone (a layer of insolation), and ozone requires oxygen, oxygen needs to be separated from the atmosphere, which can be accomplished if you had proper bacteria, which implies having microscopic life on the planet, which rely on water, which may be the reason uncle Owen runs a moisture farm. Terramorphing Mars is considered theoretically possible, although lengthy with modern tech.

As for Mustafar, Earth used to be an entirely volcanic planet, as do all young planets before they finish materializing and developing a rudimentary atmosphere which balances temperatures by either keeping heat out or keeping it in.

As for Camino... well, Europa is an entirely icy moon, if it were to ever end up closer to the sun it may very well be an ocean moon.

Only real problem is forest and swamp planets, because they imply uniform natural life, which evolve depending on very specific conditions and resources, such that they behave uniformly in what may be a very diverse climate (one needed to support known life), with different resources (hard to imagine a planet where metals, elements, acids, alkalines etc. are uniformly distributed on its surface, all of whom affect plant life. Also hard to imagine a planet where it rains evenly all over the surface). That always kinda bothered me as a kid. That and the fact you've got forest moons with lush atmospheres and probably a kajillion natural resources to support life, yet people opt for Tattooine for whatever reason.
Reply

Posted: Aug 7th 2010 10:17AM The Nth Doctor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderKnives The problem is with thermodynamics. The heat generated by just the living bodies on a planet wide city should be enough to melt the crust.
Reply

Posted: Jul 30th 2010 11:50PM cbisquit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 4:07AM omega286 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MOAR
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 2:03PM PlayLoud said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Have you ever noticed how in science fiction, entire planets will just have one defining feature? Like in Star Wars: Hoth is an ice planet, Dagobah is 100% swamp, Coruscant is one enormous city, and this place is a different planetwide city"

Let us not forget...
Endor (Entire moon is a Forest)
Tatooine (Entire planet is a desert)
Mustufar (Entire planet is a volcano)
Camino (Entire planet is an ocean)
Reply

Posted: Jul 31st 2010 6:18PM AngelusInsomnus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See: TV Tropes entry for "Planet of Hats"
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PlanetOfHats
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW