| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (52)

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:04PM mongooseblarg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Games are doing just fine without the Game Center. Not having Steam-like functionality on your iPod Touch 2G isn't the end of the world.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:05PM Nintendo Tim said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So they're only keeping support alive for devices they're actively producing?

Not surprised.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:06PM creid8 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"iPhone 3Gs, iPhone 4, 3rd-gen iPod Touch ... and that's it."

...and iPad! Right?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:02PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@creid8 iPad doesn't have OS 4 yet. :-(
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:03PM creid8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chrisgrant And it still won't have it by time GC comes out?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 7:15PM Nomgoos3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@creid8 Wait, the does the iPhone 3G support or NOT support Game Center? That last sentence when read after the headline is completely contradictory.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 7:17PM creid8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nomgoos3 3G is not supported. Article is saying "3GS", not "3G's".
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:06PM SystemPatch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"You can use Game Center when it launches later this year only on one of these products: iPhone 3Gs, iPhone 4, 3rd-gen iPod Touch ... and that's it."

So, what, iPad's not getting it either?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:06PM mbarriault said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You forgot iPad and the 4th gen iPod touch that'll definitely come out in September (when 4.1 is set to be released), and there's a lot of rumour floating around the Appleverse that it was only disabled temporarily while they work out performance issues with the earlier hardware.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:09PM Squirtle said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Who doesn't have the second gen iPod Touch? Like really?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:13PM S0lid Sn4ke said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Probably Microsoft fanboys...
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:15PM gonintendo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Squirtle i have a zune hd which i love dearly.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:16PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Squirtle People who prefer quality MP3 players?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:19PM PiiSPii said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@S0lid Sn4ke - Or people that don't want an iPod, or that want to get a 120GB iPod for the same price.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:31PM liquidsoap89 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Squirtle

120 Gig Zune for me thanks...
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:32PM AirIntake said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Squirtle Me, I've owned 0 Apple products in my lifetime. It's not that I hate them, I just know too much about electronics and Apple products always fail the cost-benefit analysis compared to what I end up buying. I don't count 'easy to use' as compensation for the 40% higher price, because to me, most electronics are easy to use.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:51PM Draugdraugr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AirIntake
+1
Here here!
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:53PM JamesHks said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@gonintendo
+1 for zune hd. best pmp i've ever owned.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 5:16PM DG Bruin 08 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@JamesHks
Totally agree with you on that end. Here's to pouring one out in honor of our Zune HD.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 6:46PM AdamSpruijt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AirIntake
fail dude, what other mp3 player has the added value of an app store. I don't have one, but you're a liar if you say anything out there is half as good a value as an iPod touch.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 10:36PM S0lid Sn4ke said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AdamSpruijt

Ummmmmm.............. no. Sorry, but the Zune HD is 1000x better than that of an iPod.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2010 12:18AM jsx92 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@AirIntake You obviously don't know jack about electronics other than numbers. Up until about 8 years ago when Apple switched to Intel they had entirely different architecture, and still do have large architecture differences from top of the line competitors. Try to find a piece of machinery equivalent to the MacBook Pro (not just the specs, but a fan-less system design in as small of a package with equivalent features), I challenge you. You'd also know, if you knew anything about electronics, that software is required to do anything complicated with them (such as operate a processor).

But you know, here I am arguing with an Anti-Apple-Fanboy. The only thing worse then someone bragging about how awesome something is is someone bragging about how awesome it isn't.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2010 9:05AM Elranzer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have the iPod Classic because I'd rather have 160GB instead of 16GB (for the same price).

That and I bought an MP3 player to play music, not play crappy games. I have a DS and PSP to play games (good ones).
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:09PM Wiizer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

That's fragmentation for ya...
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:59PM MowDownJoe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Wiizer At least now it's easy to see which features will be kept off of which phones.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:11PM J is for me said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh, screw you Apple.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:17PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Aww, you got some Endgagdet in my Joystiq.

That's going to stain....
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:18PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze And I can't spell.

Fail.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:23PM Otimus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Typical Apple.

Typical free pass for apple, too :/

At least mentioning it draws attention, I 'spose... and at least this isn't engadget, Where there's some sort of holy shrine to Apple.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:23PM CrashTunoku said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The 2nd-gen iPod Touch? The $200 8GB 3G iPod Touch as they're advertising it now? If so, I think I'm done with Apple for good after my first Apple device.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:25PM CrashTunoku said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@CrashTunoku

Three things excited me about iOS4. Wallpaper, Multi-tasking, and Game Center.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:39PM Ordeith said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@CrashTunoku

Things that are already in competitors products?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:46PM CrashTunoku said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ordeith I couldn't care less what other devices can do since I have an iPod Touch and was excited to see Apple announcing some big obvious things only to have them taken away from me.

Most of my experience over the past eight months has been finding out how half-assed this thing is in almost every single aspect. Even the cheap and free games really aren't anything to get excited about with only a few gems that will eventually get ported to other more capable systems.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:25PM ohheysean said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Just make a console already.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:50PM oOWallaceOo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ohheysean

Apple making a games console would be the worst thing ever. Take this story for example. Apple has excluded all first and second generation iPhone and iPod Touch users from this new feature. Kinect, Move and MotionPlus work with every model sold.

An Apple console would have yearly reiterations like all their other products, the games would all be downloaded from some iTunes-esque store which will have some crazy DRM and we would be bombarded with constant firmware updates.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:17PM ohheysean said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@oOWallaceOo

Slippery Slope argument!
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 5:24PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ohheysean

I don't think that qualifies as a slippery slope argument.... not that all slippery slope arguments are invalid either. They come to fruition all the time.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 5:31PM jackal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ohheysean

Apple released a console called the Pippin during the mid '90s. It offered slightly more performance than an SNES, but was woefully underpowered in relation to the N64 and Playstation. It also had an MSRP of $600 compared to the N64's $200 and Playstation's $300 price tags. Given that the Pippin had its ass handed to it repeatedly in sales (400K in a year compared to its competitors many millions), Apple's brushed off gaming and will not compete in any where but the mobile market.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2010 12:39AM zApple said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@oOWallaceOo That's cause the 3G and 2nd Gen iPod touch are having MAJOR issues running the iOS 4. They probably shouldn't of released iOS 4 for the 3G or 2nd gen iPod touch, but if they didn't, there would be people bitching about how they're excluding their older products from updates to force people to buy new products. The fact is, the hardware is just not powerful enough to run the software.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2010 9:07AM Elranzer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They already did, and it was a worse failure than the Atari Jaguar and 3DO...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Bandai_Pippin
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 3:56PM Drdre74 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well come this time next yeah 3GS won't be getting support anymore either i suppose the way things are going.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:13PM TotallyEpic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Glad I have a 3rd Gen Touch.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:21PM thisredengine said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TotallyEpic My buddy and I are glad you own a 3rd Gen Touch. BTW, I purchased an Ethernet cable today. It's blue.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 4:46PM Iron Man said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Great. iPhone 3G users continue to be shafted.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 5:11PM DG Bruin 08 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why does apple constantly screw over their loyal consumer base?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 7:32PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@DG Bruin 08
Because they, like any multimillion, international corporation, do not care about "loyalty."
To Apple, "loyalty" means you'll put up with whatever they do, and buy whatever they release.

If Apple truly cared about "loyalty"... don't you think the first generation of iPod will still be updated?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 7:48PM DG Bruin 08 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam
I don't have a problem with a company making new products to replace older models, such as a a first gen ipod. My big problem is that these products that aren't being supported now are, in essence, the same product. The lack of support for first gen touch and phone is terrible and only a minority of apple supporters do voice out their frustrations. This would be the equivalent of microsoft or sony releasing multiple versions of their current gaming consoles and not supporting their early builds.
Reply

Posted: Aug 5th 2010 9:09AM Elranzer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A better question would be...

Why does a constantly-screwed customer base stay loyal?
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 10:31PM steven1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
IPhone 3G and iPod touch 2nd gen got dropped most likely due to specs. If ios4 taxed the devices well enough to have people raging everywhere, I wouldn't want to see game center running in the background, consuming more memory, continuous wifi use due to push notifications and continuous data downloading. It would be one hell of a slow device!
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2010 11:26PM Shalabi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good riddance.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW