The third edition in the EverQuest franchise was teased by Sony Online Entertainment prez John Smedley this weekend at SOE's annual Fan Faire event. The publisher also held an extended panel on it -- tentatively titled EverQuest Next -- where Smedley revealed that the game will have "less classes" and be "more like EQ1" in that regard. He also said it has been "built from the ground up to be scaleable" and that it'll be playable on anything from "a laptop" to "a powerful PC."
Alongside the reveal, SOE released a couple of in-game screenshots, which we've dropped into a gallery below. No projected release window was given, but a smattering of specific details about the next EQ installment can be found on EQ2 Wire's liveblog of the event.
Reader Comments (24)
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:05PM FaerieTael said
' ... it'll be playable on anything from "a laptop" to "a powerful PC."'
And a PS3 ... please?
Reply
And a PS3 ... please?
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:52PM Bearcut said
@FaerieTael
Yeah no joke. Even though I am not interested in either DC Universe Online or FFXIV Online (because i don't like either game), i have been dying for an MMO on the ps3. So... I hope that DCUO and FFXIV do great on the ps3 with lots of subscriptions simply because it will open the flood gates and we will eventually get some great MMOs.
EQ would be fun, man, i used to love the punishment of EQ1 back in the day. And by back in the day I mean i played it before there were expansion packs...
Reply
Yeah no joke. Even though I am not interested in either DC Universe Online or FFXIV Online (because i don't like either game), i have been dying for an MMO on the ps3. So... I hope that DCUO and FFXIV do great on the ps3 with lots of subscriptions simply because it will open the flood gates and we will eventually get some great MMOs.
EQ would be fun, man, i used to love the punishment of EQ1 back in the day. And by back in the day I mean i played it before there were expansion packs...
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:12PM SnorlaxTheSerialKiller said
@Hank Hill
It wouldn't surprise me if there have been games that run better on laptops then on a powerful PC. Seems unlikely but it seems like one of those "so ridiculous it's true" kind of thing. Maybe it depends on the operating system and architecture.
Reply
It wouldn't surprise me if there have been games that run better on laptops then on a powerful PC. Seems unlikely but it seems like one of those "so ridiculous it's true" kind of thing. Maybe it depends on the operating system and architecture.
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:16PM Jerkface Killah said
Are those really in-game screen shots? They look like concept art. If they are in-game, I think the art style looks awesome. We'll see.
Reply
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:30PM Shadowbender said
@Jerkface Killah Yeah, the art style definitely looks very nice.
And the architectural environments look a bit similar to Fable. I like it.
Reply
And the architectural environments look a bit similar to Fable. I like it.
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:10PM Jerkface Killah said
Are those really "in-game" screenshots? They look like concept art. It is is "in-game" then the art style looks awesome. We'll see.
Reply
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:15PM SnorlaxTheSerialKiller said
@Jerkface Killah
I know nothing of EverQuest but those just look like backdrops to me.
Reply
I know nothing of EverQuest but those just look like backdrops to me.
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:43PM Sidebuster said
1st image (swampy place) looks like a screen shot, but the second has to be concept art. Look at the little guy by the gate, I doubt that's in game.
Reply
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 4:44PM GeekCujo said
Having played Everquest from launch week (which had more bugs then most betas) and falling in love with it, then being horribly disappointed with EQ2. I still have hope for this game and hope that SOE can deliver in there promise that it will be more like EQ.
Reply
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 5:13PM Spartis718 said
@GeekCujo
Brother Cujo knows the deal! True Eq veterans here! Sounds exciting!
WTS SOW for a estimated release :p
Reply
Brother Cujo knows the deal! True Eq veterans here! Sounds exciting!
WTS SOW for a estimated release :p
Posted: Aug 7th 2010 7:08PM Sidebuster said
@Spartis718
I'm on the same boat (sans playing at release. I played after first expansion). I got in EQ2 beta and didn't really like it as much as EQ. But I still bought it and played it on and off for years. I''m really looking forward to this.
Reply
I'm on the same boat (sans playing at release. I played after first expansion). I got in EQ2 beta and didn't really like it as much as EQ. But I still bought it and played it on and off for years. I''m really looking forward to this.
Posted: Aug 8th 2010 3:38AM monster215 said
@GeekCujo
Amen. Hell, if some real screens and gameplay are convincing enough, I'd definitely give it a shot. Don't mean to bag on others, but EQ Pre-Luclin and Post-Luclin are wayyyyy different. Now if they can get epic fights like back like pre-Velious... hell post-Velious.
I'd be more hyped about this than TOR or FFXIV
Reply
Amen. Hell, if some real screens and gameplay are convincing enough, I'd definitely give it a shot. Don't mean to bag on others, but EQ Pre-Luclin and Post-Luclin are wayyyyy different. Now if they can get epic fights like back like pre-Velious... hell post-Velious.
I'd be more hyped about this than TOR or FFXIV
Posted: Aug 8th 2010 4:11PM DrellAssassin said
It will be...interesting to see if this doesn't try and fail emulating its more successful (unnamed) competitor.
Reply
Posted: Aug 9th 2010 5:52PM ChooseStevo said
That must be concept art. I think this is the image you want:
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_yMIgg369-do/TF2lJxFN9vI/AAAAAAAAHIQ/Wv2fUbwcIlA/IMG_0057.JPG
Reply
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_yMIgg369-do/TF2lJxFN9vI/AAAAAAAAHIQ/Wv2fUbwcIlA/IMG_0057.JPG
Posted: Aug 10th 2010 8:02PM Sylveria said
Not to burst everyone's bubble but this game will never happen. Every one of SoE's MMOs is failing, their playerbase is righteously disgruntled for being shat on by the developers, and they're already working on DC Universe Online (which will probably also fail). I'd love to see a throwback to how MMORPGs used to be (you know.. when they were good and required some talent) but a company that is already hemorrhaging money because of EQ1, EQ2, the soon to be defunct SWO, and EvanQguard3 isn't going to crank out yet another EQ game.
Also, everyone who's chipping out "Please make this for the PS3." Why would they do that? There has been one true MMORPG on the console and that's FFXI (and the upcomming FFXIV but that's another big mess in its own right). Do you know what that is? In the western world there is no market for it. Saying slap it on the PS3 or 360 is effectively ensuring failure because then you have a game that is going to appeal to no one. PC MMORPG players are going to get stuck with a UI and features that have to be super simplified down so it's usable with a game controller and the console MMORPG players (Which will be FFXI/XIV players) are going to have no interest.
Again, I'd love to see a game that bares some semblance to EQ1, but it'll never be made.
Reply
Also, everyone who's chipping out "Please make this for the PS3." Why would they do that? There has been one true MMORPG on the console and that's FFXI (and the upcomming FFXIV but that's another big mess in its own right). Do you know what that is? In the western world there is no market for it. Saying slap it on the PS3 or 360 is effectively ensuring failure because then you have a game that is going to appeal to no one. PC MMORPG players are going to get stuck with a UI and features that have to be super simplified down so it's usable with a game controller and the console MMORPG players (Which will be FFXI/XIV players) are going to have no interest.
Again, I'd love to see a game that bares some semblance to EQ1, but it'll never be made.
Posted: Aug 22nd 2010 8:00AM TechJunkie3281 said
@Sylveria
Amen Sylveria, I'm from Everquest 2 and I couldn't agree more with you on the statement about how the dev's have shat on us. They disregarded the player base they had in the hopes to attract more /facerolling raiders from WoW. They've watered down the portion of what made the EQ line so great, the journey. Everything is geared towards instant gratification for the WoWtards now. I'm a 5.5 year veteran of EQ2 and dont believe that SOE should take advice on changing the mechanics of the EQ games from anyone who has had any less than 3 years of experience in the games (and I'm not talking about 1 year of playing and 2 years of bonus days on your station account for buying expansion packs either). What differentiated EQ's combat mechanic from other mmo's had a lot to do with the calculations that went into group synergy and the balance of player and weapon stats and bonuses. A play who knew their stuff a few years ago could out parse a player with better gear and spells if they understood the benefit of maximizing their auto-attack timing to fall in between combat art casting times. That's all gone now. With the new stat system you no longer have to wonder if you should add agility to boost avoidance and other likewise bonuses based on your class versus adding strength to increase the average auto-attack base damage per hit. Now every class is single stat based and draws all it's combat mechanic bonuses from that one stat....GIVE US BACK OUR GAME....stop trying to please the WoWtards....you arent going to get their subs....you're only losing ours.
Reply
Amen Sylveria, I'm from Everquest 2 and I couldn't agree more with you on the statement about how the dev's have shat on us. They disregarded the player base they had in the hopes to attract more /facerolling raiders from WoW. They've watered down the portion of what made the EQ line so great, the journey. Everything is geared towards instant gratification for the WoWtards now. I'm a 5.5 year veteran of EQ2 and dont believe that SOE should take advice on changing the mechanics of the EQ games from anyone who has had any less than 3 years of experience in the games (and I'm not talking about 1 year of playing and 2 years of bonus days on your station account for buying expansion packs either). What differentiated EQ's combat mechanic from other mmo's had a lot to do with the calculations that went into group synergy and the balance of player and weapon stats and bonuses. A play who knew their stuff a few years ago could out parse a player with better gear and spells if they understood the benefit of maximizing their auto-attack timing to fall in between combat art casting times. That's all gone now. With the new stat system you no longer have to wonder if you should add agility to boost avoidance and other likewise bonuses based on your class versus adding strength to increase the average auto-attack base damage per hit. Now every class is single stat based and draws all it's combat mechanic bonuses from that one stat....GIVE US BACK OUR GAME....stop trying to please the WoWtards....you arent going to get their subs....you're only losing ours.
Posted: Aug 22nd 2010 7:52AM TechJunkie3281 said
I dont honestly know where the rumors are coming from and have no of really validating them...but it seems to be popular belief in the Antonia Bayle serve in EQ2 that EQ:Next will be ported to the PS3 console. With that said, I have some skepticism about SOE's claim to scalability. I've heard companies say that before and what that really means is "We dont really care about the people with high end machines or giving them extra eye candy....we're just going to make it run mediocre on anything from a scientific calculator up." I hope to see some screen shots that are more than just concept art (in ultra high quality settings) in the near future, show us what you got SOE, your fans demand it!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
GameStop sees majority of digital sales from cash; won't pursue used PC game sales
Posted on Feb 10th 2012 5:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 155 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 107 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments










