| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 6:40AM 2late2die said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still can't understand why the published the game without multiplayer component. They self-publish the game, they can postpone it as much as needed, and they were the ones that came up with the gamers' bill of rights (or something), which mentions not getting incomplete games or some such. I mean, launch date or not, the fans would've understood a 1 or two week delay to add multiplayer (not to mention running an extra beta to get those bugs) and non fans, well, it's not like many were aware of the game anyway.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 7:37AM andrewpoe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@2late2die

I don't mind they releasing a game before its ready -- provided what's being released is playable.

Elemental: War of Magic apparently isn't playable.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 8:31AM Mokuren said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@2late2die

I don't understand either, I gather there was some problems about shops releasing the retail version days in advance in a cheap attempt to get more bucks and this causing problems, but still, that was supposedly solved with the first batch of patches. Multiplayer only after two weeks and still several bugs to solve, not to mention performance issues? Either it was rushed from the beginning or got no playtest at all.

It doesn't mean it's never going to be good. Vampire the masquerade: Bloodlines was broken to hell and back when it came out, but now it's awesome... After *SEVEN* versions of unofficial patches ON TOP of official ones, and don't get me started on Temple of Elemental Evil.

I might be interested in this game, but a year from now, when it'll be completely different from what it is now, assuming interest survives. Fortunately I'm immune to the "must have every game on day 0" fever, being always late to the party isn't bad when it gives you fixed games.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 2:15PM Harkonian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@2late2die The problem is publishers have to reserve space on store shelves. If they would have missed their release window the next available reservation they had for store distribution was March -- which means the entire release would have been delayed until March. Would you be willing to wait 6 months?

Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 5:06PM Credge said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Harkonian Who are you asking? The consumer?

Ask any MMO beta tester if they'd rather the game be released NOW or in 6 months and you'll get the same answer almost every single time.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 5:39PM Mopo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This could be a good game if it did not crash all the time and if it was more intuitive. For example; after I bought some armor/weapons I had no idea how to equip it for the longest time... Frustrating.
Reply

Posted: Sep 8th 2010 7:50PM BFBeast666 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, they want to win me back? Well, hurry up then. In about two weeks, Civ V launches. It may not have a magic system, it may not have the ability to rebuild a thrashed world, but at least it will do what it is told and work right out of the box. Uncle Sid will deliver the goods!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW