| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (15)

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:05AM Themoreyouknow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Take the money and run to Mexico.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:15AM King Johngie the Fourth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Themoreyouknow

Or Canada. No drug cartels here. Eh.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:26AM Faenix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@King Johngie the Fourth

Mm, Canada.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:56AM Themoreyouknow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@King Johngie the Fourth
What are you talking aboot?
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 1:05AM King Johngie the Fourth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Themoreyouknow

Har har. Keep it up, and I'll sic my beaver on you
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 1:16AM Themoreyouknow said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@King Johngie the Fourth
Oh noes!
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:12AM Faenix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What a waste of 75 mil
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:23AM Lukeyo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Go ooonnn take the money and run! whoo oo oo
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:43AM Lerkero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So they'll get $13 million just to move the studio and only get fined $3,375,000 if they don't hire a single person for the 3 year time frame?

Sounds like a win-win to me. Governments are getting too risky with these tax incentive deals.

I live in Michigan where the gov has started giving tax breaks to movie studios. Since then a good number of movie scenes have been filmed here, but I don't think it will ultimately create a new job market or good revenue for the state.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 1:50AM Courtney said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Lerkero

It's a bit more complex than that. If they actually failed to hire anyone within three years, they would face penalties of $6,562,500, penalties equal to about half the loan value. ($937,500 the first year, $2,250,000 the second year and $3,375,000 the third year).

I tend to oppose these kinds of tax financed loans and incentives in the first place, but it does look like they are trying to close up the more obvious holes in such financing.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 2:38AM sigma8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
10 year lease to make sure they don't suck down all the loan money, and then bolt before raking in the mad cash profits? Clearly the RI politicians are ignorant of Duke Nukem Forever and 10+ year development timetables.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 2:41AM sigma8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The loan should also stipulate that the studio be renamed to RIJOA studios. Short for: Rhode Island, Jewel Of America. With stipulations that it usually be displayed fully spelled out.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 9:48AM reebo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@sigma8
/signed
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 10:59AM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Stimulus would work if businesses weren't f*ing over their employees past, present, and future.
Reply

Posted: Sep 9th 2010 11:58AM aristokrat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So it turns out that the original creators of the loan did in fact perform due diligence in making this a win for the state. You also have to remember that most of these jobs would be in the higher income brackets, meaning that the state would be getting more tax revenue from them than lower paying jobs. They'd also be getting a lot of tax revenue from 38 Studios once they start making money. It isn't like this is a zero-condition cash handout. I'd wager that this is actually a more effective use of state money than a lot of other governmental programs, to boot.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW