38 Studios' loan from Rhode Island detailed in new report
15
Thanks to documentation from the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation, we now have a better idea of the terms involved in 38 Studios' controversial move from Massachusetts to R.I. Obtained by WPRI, the report kinda explains what's going on: 38 Studios will receive $51 million from the state; $13 million as soon as Curt Shilling's studio signs the contract to move and another $38 million as the company achieves milestones over the next 15 months. The remaining $20 million is held in some reserve to assure three years of debt payment, which is tied to other caveats.
38 Studios also has a strict job creation schedule over the next three years. The developer must have 125 full-time jobs within a year of signing for the loan, another 175 the following year and 150 more the year after. That may just be numbers to many of you out there, but industry human resource representatives and studio directors just spit coffee all over their monitors. The studio will be penalized $7,500 per year for each of the 450 jobs it doesn't create. Obviously, if you do the math, it's cheaper not to hire for the full-time job and take the penalty.
38 Studios must also announce the location of its new studio operations and corporate headquarters by November 30, 2010 -- note: the company just has to say where it's going, not actually get there. Also, the closing of the loan requires a "signed, enforceable" 10-year lease for 38 to stay in Rhode Island. Looks like R.I. wants to make sure that it's not paying to raise a studio -- which, to date, hasn't released a single project -- and watch it leave for California or Canada after it gets all that cash.
38 Studios also has a strict job creation schedule over the next three years. The developer must have 125 full-time jobs within a year of signing for the loan, another 175 the following year and 150 more the year after. That may just be numbers to many of you out there, but industry human resource representatives and studio directors just spit coffee all over their monitors. The studio will be penalized $7,500 per year for each of the 450 jobs it doesn't create. Obviously, if you do the math, it's cheaper not to hire for the full-time job and take the penalty.
38 Studios must also announce the location of its new studio operations and corporate headquarters by November 30, 2010 -- note: the company just has to say where it's going, not actually get there. Also, the closing of the loan requires a "signed, enforceable" 10-year lease for 38 to stay in Rhode Island. Looks like R.I. wants to make sure that it's not paying to raise a studio -- which, to date, hasn't released a single project -- and watch it leave for California or Canada after it gets all that cash.
Reader Comments (15)
Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:15AM King Johngie the Fourth said
@Themoreyouknow
Or Canada. No drug cartels here. Eh.
Reply
Or Canada. No drug cartels here. Eh.
Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:56AM Themoreyouknow said
@King Johngie the Fourth
What are you talking aboot?
Reply
What are you talking aboot?
Posted: Sep 9th 2010 1:05AM King Johngie the Fourth said
@Themoreyouknow
Har har. Keep it up, and I'll sic my beaver on you
Reply
Har har. Keep it up, and I'll sic my beaver on you
Posted: Sep 9th 2010 12:43AM Lerkero said
So they'll get $13 million just to move the studio and only get fined $3,375,000 if they don't hire a single person for the 3 year time frame?
Sounds like a win-win to me. Governments are getting too risky with these tax incentive deals.
I live in Michigan where the gov has started giving tax breaks to movie studios. Since then a good number of movie scenes have been filmed here, but I don't think it will ultimately create a new job market or good revenue for the state.
Reply
Sounds like a win-win to me. Governments are getting too risky with these tax incentive deals.
I live in Michigan where the gov has started giving tax breaks to movie studios. Since then a good number of movie scenes have been filmed here, but I don't think it will ultimately create a new job market or good revenue for the state.
Posted: Sep 9th 2010 1:50AM Courtney said
@Lerkero
It's a bit more complex than that. If they actually failed to hire anyone within three years, they would face penalties of $6,562,500, penalties equal to about half the loan value. ($937,500 the first year, $2,250,000 the second year and $3,375,000 the third year).
I tend to oppose these kinds of tax financed loans and incentives in the first place, but it does look like they are trying to close up the more obvious holes in such financing.
Reply
It's a bit more complex than that. If they actually failed to hire anyone within three years, they would face penalties of $6,562,500, penalties equal to about half the loan value. ($937,500 the first year, $2,250,000 the second year and $3,375,000 the third year).
I tend to oppose these kinds of tax financed loans and incentives in the first place, but it does look like they are trying to close up the more obvious holes in such financing.
Posted: Sep 9th 2010 11:58AM aristokrat said
So it turns out that the original creators of the loan did in fact perform due diligence in making this a win for the state. You also have to remember that most of these jobs would be in the higher income brackets, meaning that the state would be getting more tax revenue from them than lower paying jobs. They'd also be getting a lot of tax revenue from 38 Studios once they start making money. It isn't like this is a zero-condition cash handout. I'd wager that this is actually a more effective use of state money than a lot of other governmental programs, to boot.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 220 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 108 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
- Battleship movie adapted into FPS by Double Helix 93 comments







