| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (58)

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:14AM ZeroHour682 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This game is really starting to hit high on my radar. I got really fed up with MW2, but man I'm wanting go get a new TV now.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:15AM 216 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Keep em coming

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:54AM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@216
Sir, yes sir!
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:25AM Pigeonreaper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm finding myself pretty god-damn stoked for this game, which is not something I had thought I would for another CoD, especially a Treyarch-developed one. I started playing MW2 again recently (not least because I left Bad Company at home when I came to university) and when that game is good, it's very good; it's just that there are so many kids and assholes exploiting problems with it. It looks like Black Ops is cutting a lot of the crap from multiplayer, which is great, but I also wondered if the release of a new Call of Duty might save MW2 from some of its more unsporting fanbase.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:53AM xreadmore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Pigeonreaper
I too went back to MW2 (after playing Halo) and forgot how good it was. I play Hardcore Team Deathmatch pretty much exclusively so there are really no cheaters/glitchers. Also I have my chat set to "friends only" so I don't have to hear people tell me how much I suck.
Love the guns, love the perks, love the maps. It really is a well formulated game. I didn't like World at War except for the zombie mode, so I'm hoping this one is better.

That being said, I'm still not getting a 3D TV lol
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:32AM xFenixKnightx said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Will go nicely with my 240Hz 55" Sammy 3D LED. :-) Man this game is gonna tear MW2 up! Treyarch FTW!

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:32AM DericLee said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@xFenixKnightx

Lulz, 240Hz huh? HAHAHAHA, you have an LCD, that is a pointless spec.

Get a real TV, look into a Panny Plasma. Be a man.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 11:07AM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DericLee nothing's manlier than being accosted by strangers on the internet to buy a new tv.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 11:15AM xFenixKnightx said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DericLee

I have a Sammy Plasma in my study. Not a fan of Panny. Ive compared, and Samsung makes a superior product. Both in picture and the actual hardware itself.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:26PM Danrarbc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@xFenixKnightx you're pretty much the only person that believes that.

The Kuro II is actually pretty much the only plasma line that can claim that it actually competes with Panasonic's plasma technology. And Pioneer isn't making plasma panels anymore.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:37AM Burnflare said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It feels almost shameful to get excited, falling for the trap of the annualized Call of Duty cycle, but the features attached to Treyarch's latest effort make a compelling argument."

I must... Resist the game... Not worth it... C'mon....

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:41AM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Burnflare

Why isn't it worth it? If it looks like a good game why should it matter?
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:54AM Faenix said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Burnflare

Buy MoH instead


Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:53AM Premature ejaculation man said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Fminus Negativity To The Rescue
Dude, can I have your Grandma? She sounds awesome! I promise I won't use my super powers on her.



But I will if you let me...

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:55AM Unvrfd said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"the ever-growing list of 3D-enable"
OH OH LOOK TYPO ALERT AM I COOL NOW

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 8:56AM Unvrfd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"She sounds awesome!"
well, in theory.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:02AM Pennegan said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
They seriously need to stop looking for gimmicks like 3D to pull people in and start actually making good games. They should start looking at script writers who have ideas for feature films but can't get picked up, so maybe the script might make a good game if it can be adapted for a game.. maybe..

games have proven they can go toe to toe with films, so I think its time they start looking at it from that angle, Rather than this 3D crap.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:14AM Crayola Q Pants ESQ said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Pennegan

I have to wonder if its so much a problem of getting a good script writer as opposed to making the script writer or script an integral part of the development process.

I think it was touched on in the Enslaved review, but no matter how great the writer of the storyline is, if you're just kind of shoehorning it in there in between the gameplay its not going to achieve too much.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:50AM Faenix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Crayola Q Pants ESQ

I think if they write a script before development, the story usually suffers.

What they need to do is write a bit before (So they get a general plot), and during, development. That way they can update it as needed so the gameplay and story flow nicely together.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 12:51PM killermonkey915 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Pennegan why do stupid people like you think that 3D is some kind of gimmick? that's like saying HD is a gimmick because all that 3D is doing is making it more realistic looking.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:04AM Magic Whiskey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I admit I'd completely written off Black Ops, but the game actually seems like it might be fun. I'll probably give it a shot.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:08AM echerringtonYAHOOCOM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
here is the link for the interview on the game.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/3d-feature-call-of/705647

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:24AM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That would be awesome if they could get it in 3D on the 360 because I have a 3D TV but do not intend to get this game on the PS3. I have no friends there :-( We all play on the LIVE. Fingers crossed.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:35AM xreadmore said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Misfit Toy
I believe they were showing it in 3D on the 360 so there you have it.

PS.. I love how you called it "the LIVE"
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:43AM Faenix said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@xreadmore

I believe your 3DTV is going to waste on this game.

I think it uses the "crappy" 3D, where as the normal PS3 3D games use the "good" 3D that requires the (so called) expensive 3DTVs.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:54AM xreadmore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Faenix
Ummm what? Are you a troll or a jokester?
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:59AM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@xreadmore

Have you not read every single one of his redundant comments in this thread? He's obviously a troll, or he still thinks it's the cool thing to hate Call of Duty.

@Faenix No, no, you've got it all wrong. Now it's the cool thing to go against the "against" crowd and like COD. Get with the times man...
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:21AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Faenix

I don't think they would be showcasing the "crappy" 3D on the 360 for the preview. It must all look the same or they would have been using the PS3.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:36AM Faenix said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Eh, they can add as much as they want to this. Im still not buying it.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:42AM Recon73 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is cool they are doing this , but I don't think there is a high number of people with 3D tv's. I personally will not buy a 3D tv till you don't need the glasses.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:44AM Faenix said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Recon73

I cant see why you'd need the 3DTV with this game..

wouldnt it just use the 3D tech that needs those dorky red and blue glasses? Those, as far as I know, didnt need anything extra
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:43AM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There really hasn't ever been a Call of Duty game in the main series that had been bad (Maybe except for 3), so I don't see why it's such a surprise that it's looking good.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:25AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2

I'll have to agree with you. This series is not just a profitable one, it's also very well received by both gamers and critics. There's no reason to think that this will be a bad game by any means. I think what it all stems back to is the IW/Activision stuff. Plus, ya know, Kotick...
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:50AM Breakdown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2

COD3 was actually one of the first games I bought for PS3. At the time, I remember I was blown away by the graphics (smoke grenades in multiplayer especially).

Now being a more seasoned game vet in this console generation, I can definitely see the shortcomings 3 had. Still, I think it was a decent game for it's time.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:43AM A Sandwich said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm sure that Black Ops will continue what I feel is a pretty much unbroken streak of really good Call of Duty games, but I don't think I'll be picking it up. There are too many other promising titles coming out this fall that won't have a "sequel" next year, and those are the games I'm most looking forward to. I'm sure I'll pick it up eventually, and maybe when I do they'll have worked out all of the glitches and the "me too!" crowd will have moved away from the multiplayer. Here's to hoping!

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:46AM Faenix said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@A Sandwich

So the fact 4, W@W, and MW2 all playing/feeling exactly the same.. except with minor tweaks in what they offer (W@W offering co-op/zombie mode, MW2 offering customizable killstreaks.. and worse ones, etc.) doesnt bug you at all?

Black Ops looks exactly the same, except with some pretty big changes. But I still aint buying it.. ever
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:02AM TraceurRyuk Prepping for LBP2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@A Sandwich

Translation: Every Call of Duty game has been exactly the same... Except that they're totally different
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:04AM SNK180 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Faenix

same here
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:14AM A Sandwich said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@A Sandwich
Look, I always have fun with the new Call of Duty. I can honestly say that I've never been disappointed. But I don't feel like passing up new experiences like Kirby's Epic Yarn or DKC Returns or even Kinect for it and I have a limited budget. As far as them "feeling" the same, I dunno, I think there's something to say for "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:23AM xreadmore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Faenix
Games in a series always have the same "feel" and mechanics. That's the idea. The whole point is that the people who like the series continue to enjoy it without having to relearn the button scheme. Why would they change the button layout or control? I don't get your opposition. Are you saying they need to change the game entirely? Would it be better if the characters were now animals fighting to free their sacred trees from the evil land developer? This is Call of Duty. The story is different, the guns are different, the characters, and era are different, the MP maps are different, the perks are different, the leveling is different, the features are new and different. The only thing the same is probably the button scheme. It's not like Madden or NHL. It's a new FPS game by my standards. Just because it says Call of Duty does not mean I'm buying Modern Warfare 2 with updated rosters and a new face-off system.

some people are so damn stubborn.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 9:52AM Faenix said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Fminus Negativity To The Rescue

I talk to my grandma weekly, and she loans me $ all the time.

Just dont ignore them, and you will be good. :P

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:40AM chronicles32 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I still dont think this game is good enough to buy. Its mostly the same thing as mw2 and a lot of campers i dont get how people can enjoy that especially when those stupid kill streak rewards ruin the gameplay. It would be fine with no perks no nothing just regular guns regular health and no rewards. I know it feels rewarding when you get a massive amount of kills but what ever happened to the good old days of just strategically trying to take out your enemy and building up kills. I just hate it everytime i respawn in that game i happen to die because lil chris happened to have 10 kills already and is using the chopper to kill everybody that just respawns. Thats why im sticking to halo reach, i know it has some of the old stuff with new lil perks like armor abilities, but thats whats best about it. You actually have to strategically think how your going to take out that shield before you can get that sweet head shot. Besides bungie does a good job in filtering there multiplayer portion especially cheaters unlike in mw2 where alot of lazy peeps took the route in getting to prestige 10 the easy way and they have unlocked evrything else before anybody else. Halo doesnt have no unlockable guns, everyone is the same everyone starts the same witht the same gun and everybody fights for that sweet special gun that is hidden in the multiplayer map. Am i wrong or what? Im just saying that most cod are mostly the same and they dont really change it a bit. What do you guys think? You guys agree?

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:49AM xreadmore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chronicles32
disagree
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:56AM xreadmore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chronicles32
Sorry I should elaborate. I like Halo but prefer CoD. I don't like that in Halo you have to find a good gun. I hate dying and starting with a crappy gun and racing to find a better one only to get killed by some dude with a rocket. I prefer to pick a class at the start and to have the ability to build my favorite class. I also like real guns (as opposed to alien guns) and CoD has more variety. I also like the perks and kill streaks. Just like you said that you like to try and figure out how to knock out the shield so you can get a headshot, in CoD it's the same, you have to figure out what perks to use so you can't be seen by the pesky helicopter or heartbeat sensor etc.

Just my point of view. I still love Halo but prefer the CoD setup for multiplayer.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 2:29PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chronicles32

I haven't cracked open Reach yet, but I know that it's good just by strength of reviews.

However, the art style is tired and frankly I wouldn't mind if that entirely went away.

As for gameplay style, the dynamics are somewhat different. There's not really as much gunplay, the intensity comes from trying to outmaneuver your opponent, and sometimes having to be the first one to the draw and aiming quickly. The killstreaks in this new COD hope to lean back to COD4 and be a bit more balanced instead of ridiculous mw2-type "killstreak warfare".

I jumped back in the other day, and was a little disappointed to spend like the last quarter of a round, hiding in a building, waiting for back-to-back airstrike + helicopter from mowing me down.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 10:49AM Breakdown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Speaking only for myself, I could care less about 3D. I wish they'd stop wasting development time and dollars on making 3D games when it's still iffy on whether or not 3D tv sets will see widespread adoption anytime soon.

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 5:28PM Flapjackal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Breakdown You need content to help spur adoption. The more content, the better, no matter what form it may take. That's how I see it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 11:52AM gtb08 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It feels almost shameful to get excited, falling for the trap of the annualized Call of Duty cycle, but the features attached to Treyarch's latest effort make a compelling argument."

Alright, im getting kinda sick of this. Call of duty 3 was kinda crappy, but not altogether bad, and world at war got scores very similar to modern warfare, one bad game should not brand treyarch the lesser company. World at War's campaign is almost as good as COD2,s, and thats really saying something. This game will kick ass, and the multiplayer will surpass MW2, i can almost guarantee it

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 2:31PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gtb08

Yeah, I agree. All this Treyarch hate is unwarranted really.

I didn't find COD2 that impressive. I did like W@W's pacific campaign, dind't care so much for the Russian portion so much. All in all, a very enjoyable game.

Reply

Posted: Oct 5th 2010 12:02PM xbashingx said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I am so sick of seeing 3D being pushed on everything. Even movies that would make no sense in 3D are coming out in 3D. I may be alone here, but I personally believe, AND it is my opinion to say that 3D technology is just not ready!!! I think its a waste of money to get a 3D tv (at least right now (opinion)) I believe a couple of years from now 3D will be perfected, and we will no longer need silly 3D glasses! I BELIEVE IN SCIENCE

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW