You wouldn't blame Ken Levine for having a chip on his shoulder when it comes to Hollywood. After all, as Develop recounts, the respected game designer "failed spectacularly" in his first career as a scriptwriter. So, when Levine was offered an opportunity to make a game with, in his words, "a very talented film director," it's not much of a stretch to imagine he experienced more than a little satisfaction in turning down the offer.
"My feeling is why?" Levine questioned. "Why would any game designer want to do that?"
Aside from any personal justice he might have enjoyed, Levine answers his own question with another: "Why would I want a film director to help me make a game, any more than they would want me to help out with their films?" And he takes it further: "I think there's a sense in the entertainment fields that video games are seen as the junior varsity," he said. "There's this feeling of 'oh one day you can come up to our league.'"
"In our industry there's too many people star-struck of the movie world, jumping into deals with some big movie director just because they're big film directors." No, Levine isn't taunting del Toro, he's just reflecting on the obvious clash between how great games have been made (hint: rather anonymously) and the looming cult of celebrity eager to pervade the game industry.
But hey, Ken, at least they asked you to work with a movie director -- just about anything passes as a star these days. Who would you rather (make your game with): Bristol Palin or The Situation?
Reader Comments (14)
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 2:46PM Bryan H said
Preach it, brother.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 2:52PM KillTheApex said
Go Ken. Oh and it is spelled del Toro. "of the bull."
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 2:52PM ToastyToasy said
I applaud this man.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 2:58PM butaneko said
The "Leven" typo had me re-reading the first paragraph 5 times to determine how my video game and alcohol-addled brain had missed the introduction of a second person into the article.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 3:08PM Petebot330 said
What's that Mitch Hedberg quote about how they always ask stand-up comics to be actors? It's like asking a chef to be a farmer?
The problem is that video games should not strive to be like movies. They should strive to be better video games. "Cinematic cut-scenes" always take me right out of the game, and I'm not a fan. Part of the reason I'm a valve fan is that they recognize this.
The problem is that video games should not strive to be like movies. They should strive to be better video games. "Cinematic cut-scenes" always take me right out of the game, and I'm not a fan. Part of the reason I'm a valve fan is that they recognize this.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 3:08PM ijustw1n said
I remember when Ken Levine won all that money on Jeopardy. The rich get richer dont they.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 3:21PM finnith said
The Situation would probably be good for conflicts in the workplace.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 3:31PM DangerMouse001 said
He's right. Most interviews I read have the cringe-worthy question like, "why isn't there a half-life movie, " " How's the gears of war movie coming along?"...etc. Why does every great game have to become a movie in the first place? Some have stories or games that just don't translate well enough in a 2 hour movie. People want them for some reason, and when there's a demand, they get made. And the drive to make the movie isn't born from the quality of the game, but the popularity. And they all suck.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 3:52PM LaughingTarget said
Considering that 95% of what Hollywood has produced over the past 10 years is a reboot, re-imagining, or sequel of an existing movie or property, I don't know why anyone would be star-struck. Considering films are looking to games to rip-off some new property more frequently than games are looking to rip-off movies, I think the star-struck attitude is the other way around.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 4:28PM Jovrick said
I'm a film-maker so I can say without a shadow of a doubt that video games aren't movies. Movies also aren't video games. A lot of people don't seem to get it, I'm glad Levine does.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 5:28PM gatotsu911 said
@Jovrick
That being said, I don't begrudge filmmakers for wanting to experiment with video games. It's a whole new medium of visual storytelling, and any filmmaker inherently has an interest in that.
Reply
That being said, I don't begrudge filmmakers for wanting to experiment with video games. It's a whole new medium of visual storytelling, and any filmmaker inherently has an interest in that.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 7:03PM Jovrick said
@gatotsu911
Well I would really like to make a game myself (but I can't program, I can only animate so that's an unlikely prospect prospect). I just think people need to separate the two and make sure they're focusing on doing what either medium is good at. Cutscenes are ok, but games shouldn't strive to have as many of them as possible. Games need to be more dynamic and interactive. They need to put gameplay and variety before cinimas, and feature stories told more through interaction.
Games nowadays frequently seem to focus on shoving as many cutscenes and tutorials in the player's face as possible. A lot of games are so linear and simplistic that they actually become physically exhausting to play. People however act really apologetic towards obviously boring games just because there are people with film connections listed in the credits.
Reply
Well I would really like to make a game myself (but I can't program, I can only animate so that's an unlikely prospect prospect). I just think people need to separate the two and make sure they're focusing on doing what either medium is good at. Cutscenes are ok, but games shouldn't strive to have as many of them as possible. Games need to be more dynamic and interactive. They need to put gameplay and variety before cinimas, and feature stories told more through interaction.
Games nowadays frequently seem to focus on shoving as many cutscenes and tutorials in the player's face as possible. A lot of games are so linear and simplistic that they actually become physically exhausting to play. People however act really apologetic towards obviously boring games just because there are people with film connections listed in the credits.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 6:16PM SisypheanLife said
For what its worth, Boom Blox is a great game, and the second one is even better. A ton of fun local multiplayer.
Posted: Oct 6th 2010 10:36PM postpwn said
I'm sick of celebrities. Celebrities to me are game designers. I'm more interested on what Ken Levine has to say on a day-to-day basis than anyone Ryan Seacrest is talking about on E!. Ugh!
Featured Stories
Super Joystiq Podcast 004: 38 Studios meltdown, Gravity Rush, Civilization 5: Gods & Kings, Dragon's Dogma
Posted on May 25th 2012 3:30PM





