| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:03AM Kitanishi said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Remember the times when Diablo used to be MORE than a generic rpg/diablo-clone with wow graphics?

Yeh...those were the times...


Sadly I have no hopes for this game now. Just like Bethesda with Fallout III, Bioware with Dragon Age II and EA with Command And Conquer, Blizzard seems to be the missing the entire point of this game and making it into something it should have never been.

I don't want to play a crafting/questing RPG in shiny world with bright graphics and wow-character-designs and spend happy time party-questing for parts of Cursed Necklace of AmanghMcEvil with my trusty WitchDoctor and friendly Barbarian Orc...

I want to play Diablo, with a creepy atmosphere, lots of loot and even more of bloody slaying bloody monsters...oh and descending into deep dungeons while spamming fireballs on skeletons with my badass sorcerer


I guess I will wait for Torchlight II(and latter on TorchMMO). You just can't go wrong with the original developers of Diablo. Not to mention that Torchlight 1 hit right. a LOT of stuff that made diablo exciting

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:08AM Ashkental said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Kitanishi

You say that but you're going to pre-order it, everybody knows...

Besides, there's always Gama and Brightness adjustment so you can make it more dark.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:25AM Kitanishi said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Ashkental


Light placement in game areas =/= Game Atmosphere.


Was Torchlight "dark" as far as light placement went? no.
But it sitll felt awesome going down those wet dripping mines, gacing countles creatures, hearing that journal narration about evil that lurks below...

The game had stylized graphics, but the atmosphere was awesome. It did not feel like a generic fantasy save-the-world fest. It felt like sitting in the middle of the jungle with machete in your hand and revolver in your other hand and waiting to slaughter thousands of angry zombie pigmeys...


And no i won't preorder. I might buy ti it at day one, if the game-release schedule is horribly empty around the time Diablo III comes out (2035 was it?). Otherwise it sounds more like that kind of game which you pick up few months after release when you go to game store because you have nothing to play.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 12:15PM Xiegfried said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Kitanishi

So what you're saying is you want another Diablo II(I'm not intending to sound like a jerk with this)?

I, for one, am glad that Blizzard is adding so much more to the core Diablo experience. Every game series evolves and adds more and more to the gameplay with every new installment. Without compelling additions, the series can become stale. Plus, some additions are actually a lot more helpful than harmful. For example, being able to reuse rare runes and gems that you put into a socketed weapon is awesome. I can't tell you how many times I wasted a gem on a weapon only to find a better socketed one shortly after using it.

And as a side note, while I would rather the classic Diablo style for the characters and world, the new style isn't going to stop me from enjoying it. It's still going to be Diablo at its core, just with a different look to it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 1:04PM tcc3 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Kitanishi

Diablo isn't dark or moody enough so you're going to wait for Torchlight?

I loved Torchlight, but its graphical style is more Saturday morning than Stephen King.

You're just looking for something to hate on.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 1:17PM ZGiSH said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Kitanishi

"I don't want to play a crafting/questing RPG in shiny world with bright graphics and wow-character-designs and spend happy time party-questing for parts of Cursed Necklace of AmanghMcEvil with my trusty WitchDoctor and friendly Barbarian Orc"

I didn't know you were against barbarians or witch doctors... much less I didn't know that questing was a bad thing. It's a lot better than having a bunch of enemies in one area with nothing to do. If you wanted to do that, oh hey look, there are a bunch of Diablo 2 clones for you to play out there.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 1:44PM RequiemDogma said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Kitanishi
I think you're missing the point of the atmospheres as I doubt they've actually shown us much of the later-game.

Diablo and D2 suffered from severe, atmospheric homogenization. Everything was "dark" with signs of palpable suffering and torment. It really detracted from the later levels where you were actually in HELL. "Oh look, more darkness, yay."

Diablo's been killed now, twice, his buddies diced at least once, the world as it seems is recovering. Giving us some light to make the evil places seem, I don't know, more ominous and, well, evil, is a big step in conveying the proper sense of the series.

And don't even trip about rainbows in waterfalls, that actually happens, in case you thought the artists were being malevolent.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 3:45PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Kitanishi

How can you complain about the graphics in Diablo III and then praise Torchlight? Torchlight is arguably more colorful and more WoW-esque graphically.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 6:16PM zendharma said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Kitanishi Despite everyone hating on you, I fully agree.
DIII is turning out too cartoony and most models can't be distinguished apart from WoW.

I miss the days of feeling like a warrior walking into a tomb alone and not being able to see even the walls in the distance but know there was a horde of undead marching to you. Now we have that stupid green/blue/purple hazy fog and cartoon graphics.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:06AM Ashkental said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Diablo 3 will release before Grand Turismo 5

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 1:42PM ShadowXIII said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ashkental

I bet a Final Fantasy VII update will release before the both of them....

...who am I kidding...all of these will see the light of day after our 3rd generation children are going grey.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:14AM Modulos said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"It's been 20 years since the events of Diablo 3" ... I assume that meant Diablo 2? I haven't played the Diablo series, so I definitely wouldn't know.

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:15AM Follisimo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If I wanted to play Diablo II type game then I would play Diablo II. Blizzard isn't stupid and they are adding more to the game and just like some of the people who whined about Starcraft II it will still go on to sell outrageous numbers because it's that damn good.

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:19AM mideastbeast1214 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I am so ready for this game. It needs to come out ASAP

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:23AM BananaBoat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The words "You can't potion spam" will haunt me in my dreams.

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 11:28AM Rallion said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My favorite thing about this whole write-up was the part about lore-books. That method of storytelling worked really well in Bioshock, and I think it will work just as well here.

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 12:47PM SeriousSam24 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How can diablo be a diablo clone?

Also, torchlight's upgrade system was broken. At least you can expect polish from blizzard.

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 4:10PM zuluedison said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
" In Diablo 2, vendors would be available for you to make up for that, by allowing you to buy gear that's good enough."

I'm sorry what??? Has the writer of this article ever played Diablo II? The vendor system was a complete joke, as was gold. I am really not looking forward to D III at all anymore, it's looking more and more like world of warcraft diablo lovechild, instead of staying true to its roots.

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 6:14PM zendharma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@zuluedison I concur!
Reply

Posted: Oct 25th 2010 8:23AM Xocolatl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@zuluedison
Gamble can work out to some excellent gears. Sure, it's not nearly as good as your personal horadric cube crafting, but it's not that bad. (At least it'll get you through the game, even if you can't compete in PvP)

I'm glad many people are not liking the game. That's less horror stories that I have to contend with when I go online.
Reply

Posted: Oct 24th 2010 5:47PM NecrosavaNt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i just realised that Duke Nukem: Forever will be released before diablo 3 and gt5

Posted: Oct 25th 2010 2:07AM Epoque said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Noksukow Hell, it was in development before the original GT was even released.
Reply

Posted: Oct 25th 2010 3:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think every decision they're making with this game is the right one. Everything gameplay-wise they're adding to and changing from the old games sounds great--fantastic, even. It's gonna be awesome!

I've also noticed that all the new screenshots and media show that the graphics have been, since the game was announced, tuned for the better. The game's still got a "painted" look in the textures and especially foliage, but it has acquired a more Diablo-esque tone than it had initially, and I'm thankful for that.

I'm glad they're backpedaling a bit on the idea of giving it a whole new look; people expect changes to gameplay when revisiting a classic--even demand it--but the tone and visual style are things that can and should stay the same in a series, and that becomes even more important when it's been a long time since the last game.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW