| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (20)

Posted: Nov 11th 2010 10:02PM Huma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked the original subtitle for this preview a lot more.

Posted: Nov 11th 2010 11:03PM guttertalk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't know about the game, but this preview is one of the most worthless ones I've read. You try to explain that the AI makes the game less fun yet you say High Voltage tells you it's an early build. And you then end with a squishy conclusion. It's best if an article has a point.

Posted: Nov 11th 2010 11:26PM BigE4284 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@guttertalk

Andrew can only write the review based on what he's seen. I think that's what he's done here. He's given you the whole picture based on everything he's seen.

Regarding the game, it doesn't surprise me about the AI. In the first game enemies would simply run towards you firing your weapons, there was no intelligence, no use of cover, the only way they flanked you was based on their spawn points, not based on any intelligent decision on their part.

The game's difficult parts were merely because it threw a ton of enemies at you at once and you had to destroy the conduits to get the spawning to stop.

Andrew said it, not fun.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2010 11:51PM sonicspike41 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@BigE4284

I don't know. I read the review and thought, "Damn, this sounds really bad." Then I read the two lines where he pretty much says, "Oh yeah, all the things that make this bad? I saw a video that makes it look like they were fixed!"

I get he can't show us the new video, but couldn't he have written the preview based on the new video or at least given us more than just 2 lines saying "I know it seems bad, but there might still be hope!"?
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 12:03AM KaBob799 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@sonicspike41
Yeah I agree, at the very least it should have been mentioned in the first paragraph.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 12:24AM guttertalk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@BigE4284 :

My first question is what did he really see. His later comments indicate that he saw something that didn't deserve commenting on. (That might be as much HV's fault as Andrew's.) My second question is why couldn't his thoughts have been more coherent? Being a writer myself as well married to a former journalist, I can tell you that an editor would bounce this article back for a rewrite, to start with the point that he ends with. In journalism, it's called burying the lede.

Cynical me says that if he had, he wouldn't have had much of an article. Instead, he gets to dog a Wii game, something that still draws a crowd, especially when it's a game that's getting positive hype elsewhere.

It's the kind of sensationalist schlock that I see on tv news, like the guy who goes on for 5 minutes about cracks on a bridge and then ends with the statement that engineers found no structural weakness in the supports.
Reply

Posted: Nov 11th 2010 11:10PM Joseph9307 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Needs moar Armor Lock.




OWAIT.

Posted: Nov 11th 2010 11:23PM FriedConsole said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Conduit wasn't a waste of money but it was just a B grade game with AAA hype. Conduit was like a FPS in 2002. They probably moved up everything to FPS in 2005 for the sequel. Hope they at least ditched the annoying invisible mines. The idea to go cheesy with the plot has to be better than the snoozer of the original. It was like rejected scenes from Dues Ex.

Going to get Goldeneye instead of this.

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 10:13PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@FriedConsole
Goldeneye with the gold pro classic controller is currently $59.99 on Amazon if you or anyone else is curious.

Also, agreed. They tried the serious approach and failed on the first game pretty spectacularly... I've never been so utterly bored with a conspiracy theory. But to be honest, humor mixed with many variable settings gives me a TimeSplitters vibe. If they can capture some of what made that series so great, I'd be on-board. Have to wait and see, I guess.

Seriously, someone needs to put those crazy arcade/challenge modes in their games like Free Radical did. They're awesome.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 12:15AM Fuzunga said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked that the first game felt old. It was actually refreshing because it was different. Also, I believe Ford is now voiced by Jon St. John, so maybe that's where the DN feeling came from.

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 12:36AM ItsameMatt03 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So you couldn't find fun in a game you didn't even get to play? That's me with every game ever.

Come back and do a proper preview when you play it. Until then, I'm keeping hope alive that this is every bit as good as the original.

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 1:26AM Blackbird said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ItsameMatt03

Agreed. I feel like the main points of this article could be summarized in about the length of a twitter post.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 4:07AM edit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if you can really spend time late in the development cycle making a game artistically inspired.. That kind of needs to be there from initial concept, through pre-production and the entire development period in order to result in an inspired game.

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 6:31AM Rauland said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
TBH
For a wii game those guns look awesome. They even look like they are from a Black ops screen shot.
The PS/360 game devs really need to up the quality of the guns, they are quite shocking for the amount of power the consoles have.

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 10:43AM Rahabib said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lets face it, the Conduit will live and die on how well they implement multiplayer. This review is for the single player, and an early build at that.

I think all of really want to know is...
did they fix the bugs, glitches, cheating, add in more game play modes, add in more settings to the modes (turn off the stupid autolock button), and fix the limitation on friend codes.

Really, I dont see how they could really fix any of these. 4 player local game play is great, but in the end - if thats all they added, Ill pass. Good thing I only rented the first one.

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 11:12AM CJLopez said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rahabib Except for the friend codes part, because they will bbe running their servers on nintendo framework, they had done all that, and they had confirmed on a patch system and DLC system
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 5:54PM guttertalk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rahabib

Local player is NOT the only thing that was added. Even though the quality of the designs are in question, the feature list makes it easily the most robust of Wii multiplayer FPS:

+ Bots
+ Coop invasion mode
+ Overhauled online multiplayer
- Classes
- Loadouts
- Upgrades
- Currency for upgrades
- 7 new weapons (21 total)
- 2 new game modes
- 15 maps (maybe more)
- Revive teammates
+ Patch system to combat hackers
+ Fixed spawn glitch
+ Improved map design: more open, varying heights

I think few companies have tried to respond to customer requests as much as HV has with this game. The execution is to be determined, but their responsiveness is impressive.
Reply

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 5:44PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The main issue is that the preview build supposedly has invincibility mode turned on and AI toned down so that the flow of the game would be easier to see

Though honestly i found The Conduit's campaign to lack any especial thrills of its own. It'll be the multiplayer that brings me back

Posted: Nov 12th 2010 10:16PM Jacksons said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll be blunt, I didn't like the first game one bit, but it seems a bit of a disservice to judge a game so critically before it's even done, no?

Posted: Nov 13th 2010 4:00AM bigwilma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the preview lacked a little je ne sais quoi, infact i'm surprised the editorial staff ok'd this article. This is game journalism at its worst, its lazy, if this guy is so jaded by his job he really should be doing something else.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW