| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (103)

Posted: Jan 21st 2011 7:50PM i77ogical said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@kgoo867

When you use the term critical acclaim, you open yourself up to standards. Like it or hate it, Metacritic is the recognized standard for acclaim. Developers' bonuses are tied to Metacritic scores. Fanboys argue about the scores because they matter. It's an agreed upon standard.

Treyarch hasn't gotten even a 90 in Metacritic, whereas every AAA developer you can name has multiple games at 90 or higher.

If the "It's good but could be better" reviews for Black Ops translates to critical acclaim for you, great, but to make it stick you need outside support. Treyarch has no reason to laugh at anyone, yet, on that basis.

Posted: Feb 25th 2011 5:48PM 3stackshs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So I heard on The Modern Warfare 3 Forums that this is supposed to be based on Ghost. Can't believe they are not going with Soap or Price.

Posted: Mar 2nd 2011 11:17PM Nailo55 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Everyone on this comment chain.
Look i know some of you are against, some of you are for it, and some just don't give a flying duck. But you know what at least have some dignaty for the people who work hard to give you games!! I'm not much of a fan for COD anymore after Black Ops, but i will say over all COD is a great game and i am looking forward to any future games from (COD, Ghost Recon, Crysis, Splinter Cell, and etc.) But my point is don't rag on games you've never tried yet.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW