| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (14)

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 2:54PM Sandite5 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
German, you're doing it wrong...

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:55PM Cap Morgan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Sandite5
In Soviet Russia, Kinect controls you!
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 5:04PM StormChaser91 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Sandite5 thats what she said.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 5:13PM The Only Girl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@StormChaser91
...wait what?
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:10PM swooded said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This might get hairy since I'm guessing MS's SDK wont be free (or will require licensing) & this could be viewed as direct competition on an actual product, as opposed to just the open ability to work with the kinect like everything else has been so far. MS has stayed cool with everything thus far, but it'll be interesting to see the reaction on this none the less.

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:47PM Scuffles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@swooded Well seeing as there was no SDK to start with they had to code everything from the ground up so I doubt there would be any grounds for MS to throw a legal hissy fit with.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:56PM PreachingLlama said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@swooded Why would Microsoft's SDK not be free? Microsoft has no other paid-SDKs on Windows, so I'm unsure what your precedent is.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 6:57PM swooded said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@PreachingLlama
It's my understanding that their SDK for Xbox live development, while free, requires that anything released be licensed by MS - that's where I was going with it. I would guess their other sdks may as welI, though I'm not sure. I admittedly don't know all there is to know about the licensing or general SDK availability for windows. At first glance, it just looks like more direct competition with what MS is planning was my main point. ie: If the MS SDK requires licensing fees vs competitive SDK released by another company not requiring MS license, it is a direct profit stream loss for MS.
I'm a 360 & Kinect owner and definitely don't want to see any legal issues come out of all the open development that's been going on - just saying it seems that this release of (somewhat) fully featured SDK could hit closer to home than most of the other tools that have been released so far & I'm interested in seeing what the reaction (if any) is from MS .
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:26PM Hunter141072 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For all the guys who thought that kinect hacks where only "useless junk with no game value" but once again we are seeing that kinect is starting to get a life of it´s own... with no xbox... but with the p.c. funny......

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:42PM Aperture said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Holy crap, it'd be awesome to play RUSE with the kinect.

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:48PM Scuffles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...... people are just hell bent on giving me a reason to buy a Kinect aren't they >,<

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 3:53PM styleznma said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
well at least now im somewhat starting to want a Kinect; for the pc interaction and not gay xbox games they have released thus far

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 5:13PM The Only Girl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@styleznma
Really? I think they incredibly fun--if you have friends and family to play with.
Reply

Posted: Feb 11th 2011 4:08PM Churchbus said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Instead of "Sensing Custom Software for Kinect", they should go with "Sensing User-Custom Kinect Software".

Or SUCKS, for short.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW