1979: The Game is not much of a game yet. "For now, we do not have a demo to show," creator Navid Khonsari told Joystiq, when we inquired about the intriguing, and equally mysterious, project said to depict the Iran Revolution from various perspectives. 1979 made its surprise debut in a broad interview with Khonsari conducted by Russian network RT earlier this month. That debut consisted of little more than a logo (seen above) and some vague, conceptual discussion about the game.
Khonsari confirmed that 1979 is indeed a property of Ink Stories, his multimedia production company, but "we do have a number of partners, which I am not at liberty to mention," he noted. Currently, the game is "in development" -- meaning that the pre-production design is "locked down" -- and the developers are "working with a number of unique game engine prototypes in order to release this game simultaneously on a number of platforms." Khonsari added that this early development phase includes testing out "a number of different designs" for the gameplay.
"I would like to see 1979 as a console game with sandbox elements," he explained, without confirming that a console release would be definite. "In particular, we are creating three unique opening levels that allow the player to choose which way they want to get into Iran to free the hostages [at the US Embassy]." Khonsari added that the game's narrative would draw upon "historical truths of the time" and "will provide three, distinctive sandbox environments."
Khonsari described 1979 as a "social political game" that, in addition to open-world, sandbox environments, could feature "strategy elements with the use of AI combatants." Once in Iran, additional player-controlled characters would be introduced, "allowing you the ability to play a number of different roles," he added of the game's lofty design goals. And he wasn't finished: "The multiplayer aspect is something I am really excited about, but is still in the works." (No kidding.)
As improbable as it may seem for all of these elements to come together into a marketable game (the purposeful ambiguity of who's "good" or "bad" in 1979 sounds novel, but it's also risky), Khonsari is no stranger to seeing challenging and innovative projects through to the end -- he's had his hand in Grand Theft Auto 3, Bully and Alan Wake, to name a few. "We are on course to self-publish," he declared, "but the interest from third parties has been overwhelming, so we are weighing those options."
'1979' Iran Revolution game envisioned as 'social political' title, with sandbox and strategy elements
52
Reader Comments (52)
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:20AM CaptainProtonX said
Will I be able to beat hookers with a baseball bat?
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:17PM Mazrael said
@CaptainProtonX
You know back then a woman was executed because she killed her husband as he slept.. she killed him because he beat the crap out of her
A few years back a woman was stoned to death because she wasn't a virgin at her wedding... (she failed a hymen test with a towel)
In the west one could be self defense out of fear for her own life, the other would be murder
Reply
You know back then a woman was executed because she killed her husband as he slept.. she killed him because he beat the crap out of her
A few years back a woman was stoned to death because she wasn't a virgin at her wedding... (she failed a hymen test with a towel)
In the west one could be self defense out of fear for her own life, the other would be murder
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:50AM CaptainProtonX said
@TheShaper
You didn't shape those. They were forged by the Internet.
Reply
You didn't shape those. They were forged by the Internet.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:21AM Getchow hands out my fries said
Phony beatle-mania has bitten the dust...
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:32AM MasterD said
@JnRx Please don't talk like that and this is the most idiotic idea for a game that I have seen. There shouldn't be a game based on the 1979 revolution as it was a very bad time for Iran and the people, since they lost Shah and the Islamic Republic took over and have since ruined the country.
I don't understand how something like this would be a good idea for a game. The only thing would be for this game to be historical and teach people about what happened and how it has affected the country for over 30 years. And there will be a multiplayer aspect too? What the heck is the creator thinking?
Reply
I don't understand how something like this would be a good idea for a game. The only thing would be for this game to be historical and teach people about what happened and how it has affected the country for over 30 years. And there will be a multiplayer aspect too? What the heck is the creator thinking?
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:13AM Jack Kevorkian said
@MasterD the game will never get shipped anyway. If you cant get a Afgan FPS published you are as hell aint getting this one going. Too bad, I love odd ideas.
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 12:14PM wcarnation said
@MasterD So... something is bad so nothing should focus on it?
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 7:05PM Tachyonic Cargo said
@Jack Kevorkian
They said they were prepared to self publish it, something that Atomic Games did not have on their side when it came to getting 'Six Days in Fallujah' out to the public. So do not be surprised if this game ships despite any controversy surrounding it as it nears completion.
Then there is always the Rockstar option. As a former employee of Rockstar, it is highly likely that Navid Khonsari still has strong ties to the one company in the gaming industry who is not chickenshit of controversy, and has no problem taking on negative press, head on.
So now you have two avenues for this game to see the light of day. Considering how ambitious the design itself is (multiple beginnings, multiple paths, no good or evil (just people), and what I am assuming will be a highly innovative multiplayer mode (likely something not seen in game before), and likely multiple endings, provided they can actually prototype all that, make it work and make it actually not boring to play, there is a very good chance that unlike 'Six Days in Fallujah' who's publisher Konami, chickenshitted out on the developer in the 11th hour, '1979: The Game' stands a very high chance of actually making it unto store shelves.
Reply
They said they were prepared to self publish it, something that Atomic Games did not have on their side when it came to getting 'Six Days in Fallujah' out to the public. So do not be surprised if this game ships despite any controversy surrounding it as it nears completion.
Then there is always the Rockstar option. As a former employee of Rockstar, it is highly likely that Navid Khonsari still has strong ties to the one company in the gaming industry who is not chickenshit of controversy, and has no problem taking on negative press, head on.
So now you have two avenues for this game to see the light of day. Considering how ambitious the design itself is (multiple beginnings, multiple paths, no good or evil (just people), and what I am assuming will be a highly innovative multiplayer mode (likely something not seen in game before), and likely multiple endings, provided they can actually prototype all that, make it work and make it actually not boring to play, there is a very good chance that unlike 'Six Days in Fallujah' who's publisher Konami, chickenshitted out on the developer in the 11th hour, '1979: The Game' stands a very high chance of actually making it unto store shelves.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:28AM Mehbah said
Depicting a conflict from multiple angles and hopefully showing that each side has their own motivations? The media will be all over this game and its "anti-US propaganda". Meanwhile, games like Homefront get released and no one even raises an eyebrow.
More games where the morality isn't black and white, please.
Reply
More games where the morality isn't black and white, please.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:35AM MasterD said
@Mehbah What motivations are you talking about? Unless you're talking about Ayatollah Khomeini being part of the revolution, removing Shah from power and having him exiled then taking over the country and ruining it with his "friends" for over 30 years? We don't need a game about the 1979 revolution as it is a disgrace and it is the main reason why Iran is the way it is currently and a 3rd world country.
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 12:00PM Mehbah said
@The Deuce
You're scared of a game where both sides' motivations are portrayed in an objective fashion. Why is that? Is it because you're scared of a world that isn't entirely black and white?
If the nazis were so bad, then we should be able to show why without resorting to "they're evil!". And, just as importantly, just because one side is very bad, it doesn't mean that the other shouldn't be criticized as well. But I suppose that actually thinking about things is a bad idea, according to you.
tl;dr: let people think for themselves instead of telling them what to think. But I suppose you prefer censorship over free speech.
Reply
You're scared of a game where both sides' motivations are portrayed in an objective fashion. Why is that? Is it because you're scared of a world that isn't entirely black and white?
If the nazis were so bad, then we should be able to show why without resorting to "they're evil!". And, just as importantly, just because one side is very bad, it doesn't mean that the other shouldn't be criticized as well. But I suppose that actually thinking about things is a bad idea, according to you.
tl;dr: let people think for themselves instead of telling them what to think. But I suppose you prefer censorship over free speech.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 12:18PM MasterD said
@Mehbah He isn't telling anyone what to think or how to think. He is just staing the fact that the 1979 revolution was THE most tragedies for Iran and is the cause of why the country is the way it is to this day. The current regime and government of Iran ARE evil, because they removed Shah from power and cause all of this mayhem. They basically ruined the reputation of Iran in front of the world.
If you knew anything about the revolution, you would know that the US implanted the current government of Iran so I guess the other side would be the US? Also, name me one movie or game where it displays Nazis as the good guys...there aren't none. So why should there be a game about the 1979 Iran revolution allowing players to play as both sides, including the bad guys pretending to be rightful?
There are a lot of rednecks in this topic that don't know what they're talking about, which is unfortunate.
Reply
If you knew anything about the revolution, you would know that the US implanted the current government of Iran so I guess the other side would be the US? Also, name me one movie or game where it displays Nazis as the good guys...there aren't none. So why should there be a game about the 1979 Iran revolution allowing players to play as both sides, including the bad guys pretending to be rightful?
There are a lot of rednecks in this topic that don't know what they're talking about, which is unfortunate.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 12:35PM Mehbah said
@MasterD
"He isn't telling anyone what to think or how to think."
Yes he is, and so are you. I quote: "No that is the least we need the guy and his followers are evil and should not exist." You don't want people to discuss this, you just want them to hate the side you don't agree with.
"He is just staing the fact"
No. What the most tragic thing is, isn't a fact. What a tragedy is is subjective.
"If you knew anything about the revolution"
Now you're calling me stupid for not knowing anything about the revolution, while at the same time arguing that it's bad to educate people on both sides of the conflict. Good effing job, you hypocrite.
"Also, name me one movie or game where it displays Nazis as the good guys...there aren't none."
I never said there are any to my knowledge. Learn to read. And that's exactly why we should see both sides of the damn conflict. But according to your utterly ignorant viewpoint, showing both sides in an objective way is the same as showing the nazis as the good guys. It's time for you to grow up mentally and realize that the world isn't black and white.
"There are a lot of rednecks in this topic that don't know what they're talking about, which is unfortunate."
Now I'm a redneck for saying that we should be objective and look at both sides before passing judgement. Meanwhile you're saying that it's much better to hate one side without listening to what it has to say. Truly, you are filth. Don't you have any books to burn instead?
Reply
"He isn't telling anyone what to think or how to think."
Yes he is, and so are you. I quote: "No that is the least we need the guy and his followers are evil and should not exist." You don't want people to discuss this, you just want them to hate the side you don't agree with.
"He is just staing the fact"
No. What the most tragic thing is, isn't a fact. What a tragedy is is subjective.
"If you knew anything about the revolution"
Now you're calling me stupid for not knowing anything about the revolution, while at the same time arguing that it's bad to educate people on both sides of the conflict. Good effing job, you hypocrite.
"Also, name me one movie or game where it displays Nazis as the good guys...there aren't none."
I never said there are any to my knowledge. Learn to read. And that's exactly why we should see both sides of the damn conflict. But according to your utterly ignorant viewpoint, showing both sides in an objective way is the same as showing the nazis as the good guys. It's time for you to grow up mentally and realize that the world isn't black and white.
"There are a lot of rednecks in this topic that don't know what they're talking about, which is unfortunate."
Now I'm a redneck for saying that we should be objective and look at both sides before passing judgement. Meanwhile you're saying that it's much better to hate one side without listening to what it has to say. Truly, you are filth. Don't you have any books to burn instead?
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:28PM The Deuce said
@Mehbah
"You're scared of a game where both sides' motivations are portrayed in an objective fashion. Why is that? Is it because you're scared of a world that isn't entirely black and white?"
Please. don't BS us. You know that when they talk about "showing both sides' motivations" they're talking about relativizing things and showing the other side in a sympathetic light, not being objective. It's obvious that that's what you mean too, because of your "not all black and white" blather. It's when you look at things objectively, and not through the subjective prism of your feelings, that you see the hard differences between them.
The *objective* motivations of the Iranian mullahs was that they wanted to reinstate a theocratic Islamic empire, exterminate the Jews, subjugate women, and eventually bring the whole world under sharia law. There's nothing gray about it, and only by retreating into blinkered subjective desire to avoid hard judgment and pretend that everyone's feelings are equally valid can you avoid seeing the evil in it.
Reply
"You're scared of a game where both sides' motivations are portrayed in an objective fashion. Why is that? Is it because you're scared of a world that isn't entirely black and white?"
Please. don't BS us. You know that when they talk about "showing both sides' motivations" they're talking about relativizing things and showing the other side in a sympathetic light, not being objective. It's obvious that that's what you mean too, because of your "not all black and white" blather. It's when you look at things objectively, and not through the subjective prism of your feelings, that you see the hard differences between them.
The *objective* motivations of the Iranian mullahs was that they wanted to reinstate a theocratic Islamic empire, exterminate the Jews, subjugate women, and eventually bring the whole world under sharia law. There's nothing gray about it, and only by retreating into blinkered subjective desire to avoid hard judgment and pretend that everyone's feelings are equally valid can you avoid seeing the evil in it.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:06AM Jude said
Not everyone in Iran felt that having a puppet of the US in charge to give away cheap oil to the west was the best thing for the country. While the Revolution may have led to certain unsavory elements gaining power, it was a very controversial and influential time in history that needs to be explored, not ignored. The premise of this game is brilliant and I hope that it somehow leads to an elevation of awareness of events that have gone largely ignored in the west. Your perspective differs from mine and that is potentially what this game is all about.
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:25AM Jack Kevorkian said
@Metalfacedoom if this game is a hit we can look forward to:
1961 - Bay of Pigs Rockin' Beach Party
Reply
1961 - Bay of Pigs Rockin' Beach Party
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 10:42AM FriedConsole said
This game sounds like a cool concept that will be either be impossible to develop or really disappointing. I give this a 10% chance of actually being published. If it is never published, people on message boards can at least lament that it could have been the greatest game ever and that corporations are always squashing artists visions.
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:33AM Jack Kevorkian said
@MasterD F*** you and your censorship. I dont care if they make a baby skinning simulator if thats what someone wants to make.
Go back to Britain where you can worship your Queen in peace.
Reply
Go back to Britain where you can worship your Queen in peace.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:38AM eat it said
The should make a game called "2005: The Game"
You get to play as Dick Cheney. The goal would be obtain drilling contracts on the south pars gas fields in Iran. You have to do whatever it takes, even if it means selling nuclear reactor technology to Iran.
Here's where the the difficulty comes in. You have to do this all while convincing the American public that Iran is their biggest threat.
Reply
You get to play as Dick Cheney. The goal would be obtain drilling contracts on the south pars gas fields in Iran. You have to do whatever it takes, even if it means selling nuclear reactor technology to Iran.
Here's where the the difficulty comes in. You have to do this all while convincing the American public that Iran is their biggest threat.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:39AM Jack Kevorkian said
@eat it only if they added a hard mode. otherwise it would be too easy.
E for Everyone.
Reply
E for Everyone.
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 12:00PM Jack Kevorkian said
@eat it RTS where you control Blackwater agents to attack villages sitting on possible oil depos?
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:37PM Mehbah said
@MasterD
"Everyone that doesn't agree with me is a troll!"
You are one of the most close-minded people I have ever seen. You essentially want to shut up every single person that doesn't agree with you. Have you ever heard of free speech, and the various ideologies that surround it?
Reply
"Everyone that doesn't agree with me is a troll!"
You are one of the most close-minded people I have ever seen. You essentially want to shut up every single person that doesn't agree with you. Have you ever heard of free speech, and the various ideologies that surround it?
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:37PM cdkee said
Half of you people don't know what you're talking about. Iran had a democratically elected government which the US and UK intelligence agencies overthrew and put in place for 30 years a dictator, the shah. Then there was the revolution. Contrary to what the US media tries to tell you, Iran is a beautiful country and ks not a complete hellhole like they lead you to believe.
Reply
Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:55PM MasterD said
@cdkee so what you're trying to say is that the current regime and government is better than the one back in the Pahlavi dynasty? Stop smoking crack and learn something. Are you a Persian? No you're not. The US invented a puppet (Khomeini) and overthrew (as well as exiled) the Shah. This current regime and government led by Khamenei (the successor of Khomeini) as well as Ahmadinejad (another puppet) is the main factor as to why Iran is a 3rd world country.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
Persona 3, Tactics Ogre, and other PSP RPGs that will live on my Vita
Posted on Feb 22nd 2012 5:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Rumor: Japanese Vita devs jumping ship, Sony responds 124 comments
- Buy 2 get 1 free on select Vita games at GameStop starting today 114 comments
- Sony's Rohde: proprietary Vita cards 'completely necessary' to combat piracy 112 comments
- Sony: Call of Duty blasting onto Vita this fall 89 comments
- Asura's Wrath review: Wrecking the curve 84 comments









