| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:03PM Urethra Alfredo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Gwen Stefani has done a pretty good job of appearing to be a "virtual karaoke circus act" all on her own...

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:34PM ccrosby said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Urethra Alfredo Ha! I was thinking the same thing after reading this story.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:04PM KillaPat said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Whiny bitches :)

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:12PM Blay said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
As much as I want to see Kotick lose money I know he would just lay off more people to make up for it.

Undecided on how I want this to go...

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:25PM Guhungus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
While I do like to see Activision squirm, this is a real cheap way for the members of No Doubt to behave.

When have characters ever been used only for specific songs in Guitar Hero games. Typically, they're unlocked - what the hell did they think was going to happen?

They probably only have a handful of songs on the game anyway (I don't know, I haven't played them). What's the point of showing up for a total of 12 mins. of the whole game? You're there to sell the game. Be grateful you're relevant... or were.

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:57PM Colin said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Guhungus

Jimi Hendrix was only for his own songs I believe in GH4, and Lego Rock Band restricted the use of Queen to Queen songs, Bowie to Bowie songs and etc. I think that's a fair restriction.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:02PM spikeylee said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Guhungus

Not that I don't agree that all characters should be playable in all modes, it has happened before where a character is locked to only their own songs; Guitar Hero World Tour did this with the Jimi Hendrix avatar. If one of his songs appeared in your set list, your character would automatically be switched to Jimi.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:30PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They had a really weak legal argument (artistic license) on that motion. I'm guessing they are getting close to a motion for summary judgment, which Activision should win. The contract seemed pretty clear on the use of the characters in the game. The only real question is whether there was fraud involved in getting that into the contract.

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 4:04PM JasonA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@vidguy

I think they just DID have a Motion for Summary Judgment.

The article says Activision Blizzard failed in their appeal to throw out the suit. Attempting to throw out a suit likely means a Summary Judgment Motion.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 4:41PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@vidguy

Nope. Activision moved to dismiss. This is a preliminary motion to get the court to throw out the suit for some deficiency, usually because the plaintiff has failed to state a real legal claim.

A motion for summary judgment occurs later, when a good amount of evidence has been produced. The court then will actually decide the case for one of the parties, based on that evidence, without a jury. It can only happen when the parties have agreed on the facts and only need a legal resolution.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:32PM nandokun said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Is this even the band that cares about this? Or is this the band's management trying to make a buck suing?

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:33PM HardBoiled2009 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I hope No doubt wins. FU Kotick !

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:40PM mietha said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This suit has no basis and should have been thrown out. The members of No Doubt have zero chance of winning anything.

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 8:46PM PointlessPuppies said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@mietha I love the part where you posted irrefutable evidence to back up your claims.
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 1:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
this shit is bananas

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 9:27PM Russet Burbanck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

B...
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 11:36PM darkinchworm said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Russet Burbanck

Please no.

But Russet dude, really, I'm just commenting because of your avatar. +7
Reply

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:03PM wcarnation said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The fact you could use characters on any song, or characters at all, was really stupid and another terrible nagging point of the terrible Guitar Hero series

I'd like No Doubt to win just to stamp out crap like that

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:15PM SuperAngryMeatBirdBoy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Show Must Go On.

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:28PM Chico said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If I were the judge, I'd a single issue to ask of No Doubt's lawyers:

Do you intend to sue every arcade, karaoke bar, or other establishment that has Guitar Hero available, and is thus using your likeness for their own gain? What about if they have Rock Band and created avatars that look like and are named after your band's members? Is this really the direction you want your image to be taken, that it's more about something due you than about your fans getting to enjoy your music in a new way?

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:34PM ObiAlKenobi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope Activision loses.

Posted: Feb 18th 2011 2:42PM Admiral White said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ouch, talk about coming back to haunt you from the grave.

Either way, I'm not sure if this lawsuit will still hold considering how long it has been since it first appeared and how the Guitar Hero franchise is now dead.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 9:23AM Rocketboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who is this No Doubt? Are they a band or something?

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW