| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (122)

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:50PM doubtingthomas said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He forgot to say that "It's going to be really bad" as well

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:38PM copa said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@doubtingthomas

Am I the only person here who thought "The Fighter" and "Three Kings" were really, really, good movies, and willing to give David Russell the benefit of the doubt until we see some footage?
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:50PM GentlemanWrath said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@copa

It's not that he's a BAD director, it's that he's an inappropriate choice when we consider the type of movie that we all hope Uncharted would be, which, at the end of the day, is basically just a modern day Indiana Jones. (Fun action/adventure set pieces, daring escapes, witty banter, light romantic elements, lots of bullets, etc.)

It's like asking Alfred Hitchcock to direct Die Hard --- just a bad combination.

Russell is digging himself deeper and deeper the more he opens his mouth though.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:56PM nonnie said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@copa No you're not the only one. People are throwing fits because Nathan Fillion wasn't cast as Drake, and it's not playing out exactly like they imagined it would in their little fan boy heads. I love Nathan Fillion and think he would have been dope for the role, but let's go ahead and get over it and just wait and see what happens. I guarantee everybody on here whining about it will see this movie in theaters. Period.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 5:14PM Asakura H said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 5:28PM mezzaninex said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@copa

Those were the only Russell movies I've seen and I loved them both, I think he's a great fit for Uncharted. Fanboys will whine.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 5:35PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@doubtingthomas

Yes, and who calls anything propulsive? I suppose it is a good alternative to repulsive.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 5:38PM EEdocSnitthu said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Asakura H
That's about EVERY attempt by hollyweird and I did enjoy 'The Fighter' too! Them libertardic hollyweirdos just can't figure out Absolutely Everything and have now run to comic books! and remakes of old tv shows to cash in now. Attempts at making flicks outta games have been running 1 to Uncountable on the scale. 'Mortal Combat' pulled in the bennies despite taking long number two all over it and That Is It for them.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 5:40PM friendlygummybear said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@copa

I really dont think its about him being a bad director or him not being able to make this movie good. Its about him taking the name uncharted and making it into something totally different. Think of the american super mario brothers 2. The game had nothing to do with the Mario universe besides having the Mario characters in it. It was a completely different game they threw the name on and passed it off as Mario for the sake of it.

Based on all his ideas on what this movie will become, its going to turn into one of those situations where people see the movie then go play the game and ask: "How are these even related?"
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 6:09PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@friendlygummybear

You've got it all wrong. King Koopa was definitely a T-Rex.

It sounds like Russell is assuming that the void of good movies based on video games is a result of film makers trying to stay too faithful to ideas from the games.

Ironically, the only good video game movie is the one that changed the least in the transition from game to film.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 6:41PM Don Cheeto said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@copa
Please, this is a gaming site. Nobody here even knows the titles of any good movies.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 7:24PM xenophy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@nonnie

You obviously havent been keeping up with what is going on with this movie. The casting was not the big part of why people are against this movie, people are upset with how the movie is coming along itself, look through some of the older articles joystiq had on here about it and you will see why people have been reacting like this. The direction russell is going with this movie is breaking away from everything the game is and its just going to be a generic pile of crap instead of the masterpiece the games were
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 11:21PM Jennacide said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@copa
Let's get the important parts aside first.
1) Three Kings is a great movie, but not because of Mark Wahlberg.
2) The Fighter is a /good/ movie despite Mark Wahlberg.

You can be a fine director, but putting an awful actor as your main character will usually make the film utter shit. As stated, The Fighter was an odd exception. And as many have pointed out, there are other director's much better suited to the source material. He wants to make it something totally different and be taken seriously, when Uncharted is all about being the game equivilant of a popcorn movie.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2011 1:06PM JasonA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@GentlemanWrath

Alfred Hitchcock would have been pretty good for Die Hard - the movie had a confined setting, charming lead actor, lots of story telling by visual information rather than dialogue, etc.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:52PM bigwhiteyeti said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"it's going to be real, it's going to be raw, it's going to be intense, it's going to be original, and it's going to be propulsive."

....It's gonna be crap.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:53PM thisredengine said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@bigwhiteyeti Yup, notice how he forgot to include "good" in that sentence.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:54PM thisredengine said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
And seriously. "Propulsive"? Who on earth talks like that? Already a strike against this guy.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:24PM Pure Black World Tendency said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Perhaps the interviewer misheard "repulsive"
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:25PM Pure Black World Tendency said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Pure Black World Tendency aaaaand I realized that that very comment was made right under this one. Forget I ever said it!
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:52PM Verb4tim said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"....and it's going to be repulsive." Fixed it for you Russell. You can thank me later.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:54PM Bruce Wayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Don't Worry Nathan Fillion, I Still Love You.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:54PM Razer922 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure whether to laugh or cringe.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:55PM Outrager said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Why bother getting the Uncharted name if you're not going to make it somewhat like the game?
Maybe the cost of buying the name guarantees a certain amount of money for the movie?

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:55PM Courtney said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He sounds like a frat boy describing what he expects his first orgasm to be like.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 5:40PM Rucury said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Courtney

Bravo, good sir.

I think it's too late... By now, they probably have half the movie shot with Mark... I'll probably see it either way.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:55PM The Minn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
so basically everything he said has absolutely no relation to the game, at all.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:57PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"there's not a bunch of movies you can point to that are made from games that are amazing movies, that stand up to time as a franchise or as [individual films]." Maybe that has something to do with movies being made out of games like Mario (Oh hi, bob hoskins) Street Fighter, and Doom. Do i really even need to explain just how vastly different they are from a game like Uncharted?

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:41PM Magetf said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TheDarkWayne

Not to mention they changed everything from the games, just like he's doing.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 6:14PM doc j said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Magetf

Can't express enough how right you are. It's almost as if he's saying "Almost every video game movie made to date has been trash. So I'm going to do the exact same thing every one else did."

Ugh.
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2011 2:45AM alinos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheDarkWayne

the thing is with doom if anything the best part of that movie was the first person point it was at least a throwback to the game as well as pinky.

The issue is they felt for some reason they needed a human v Human thing which is what screwed it

SMB was ruined because it basically went we have 2 guys with moustaches now lets do something stupid with them.

If they get out the whole real world spiel from it they could have made a decent movie instead you had some poor special effects and goomba's that look nothing like them

then we have uncharted as much as i want fillion in it i don't care that he's not. He has Castle and hopefully at somepoint another DR horrible on the way

The issue is that the script is a bastardisation of uncharted that for the most part is probably another movie that's been shoehorned to try and fit in the uncharted world

when the original uncharted basically is set for a movie as it is. Theres no reason to change it. I Don't care that i know whats going to happen i just want to see an awesome adaptation and then with the sequel you go and beat your own path based on that.

instead where gonna end up with a bunch of characters that will bear little to no resembelence personality wise as they do in the game
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 3:58PM Jack Kevorkian said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I dont understand why you'd pay for Uncharted rights. So many similar stories and characters are out there just loosely base your characters off of Uncharted archetyes and dont pay anyone but yourself.

In a narrative sence Nathan Drake is as deep as a glass of water. Just cast a younger Harrison Ford and give him dusty clothes.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 6:11PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jack Kevorkian

Hey, it worked for Nick Cage. Where would he be without the classic game franchise "National Treasure?"
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2011 12:04AM XLM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Chareth Cutestory

out driving angry?
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:00PM Duc748s said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
He really needs to stop talking. Every time he says something he pisses off the fans more and more. If you played the game, how do you figure your movie fits in the Uncharted franchise? I am baffled, unless he played Indiana Lego or coke...lots and lots of coke.

Posted: Feb 22nd 2011 3:36PM Capnwinters said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Duc748s You speak the truth. And I don't know much about David Russell, but you'd think that he would realize that EVERY TIME HE F***ING TALKS about the movie, the Internet turns into a river of flame. Hey Russell, maybe you should listen to the only people you know are interested in the movie.

It's not like we're some crazy fringe group. We are the people that played and bought the game! A logical assumption would be that we are the people who will care if someone makes a movie about it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:02PM KiraXD said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
its gonna be bad... this guy is an idiot... mark whalberg will make a terrible drake... i mean seriously dont we all remember the last video game movie he did? max payne was pretty crappy, and on top of that, mark already expressed his opinions about playing the game first (which he hasnt, and he didnt for max payne either.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 10:24PM Altairio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@KiraXD

True. I do think he's a good actor, but he definitely has a limited range, and Nathan Drake does not fall within it. If there's one thing Wahlberg is not particularly good at, it's being self-deprecating and vulnerable, which are key qualities of the Drake character. They're also qualities Nathan Fillion demonstrated in spades as Malcolm Reynolds. Hell, Indiana Jones, Malcolm Reynolds and Nathan Drake are all pretty much the same character if you think about it...and squint...
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:04PM EliminatorZigma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*cough*bullshit*cough*

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:05PM Mika101 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why can't we just keep games to games, books to books and movies to movies. Crossing the paths never turned out well.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:12PM Jack Kevorkian said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Mika101 books to movies do okay.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:14PM Dextro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mika101
2001 begs to differ imho :)
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:32PM Jack Kevorkian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dextro you can come up with a hundred example of excellent books to movies. The Shining was a much better film than book for example and No Country For Old Men didnt lose a step on the big screen from the novel.

Not common, but happens all the time. Game to movies? ummmm...never?
Reply

Posted: Feb 22nd 2011 9:37AM Russet Burbanck said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mika101

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas...nuff said.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:05PM LordAbsu said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That picture made me throw up a little in my mouth.

...

Okay, I lied: I threw up A LOT.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:06PM merdbrue8 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"You guys are playing the game, and it’s about playing the game. It’s not about a narrative embracing you emotionally. You know what I’m saying? "

You forgot to mention this line.

How can he claim to understand the game, if he can say this with a straight face. Maybe uncharted isn't the best example but the context was more a general comment about games, at least how I read it.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:14PM Jawmuncher said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@merdbrue8
When I submitted the story, that was the line that pissed me off the most.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:06PM Hong Dong said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Propulsive? Christ he's making a movie, not re-inventing the wheel. You'd expect to hear this kind of tripe beforehand. Methinks two things:

1) A Michael Bay like "experience"; car chasers/explosions/female lead masterbatory material/crap script

2) Or straight to DVD. Which might be better.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 6:15PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Hong Dong

We've all been hoodwinked.

David O. Russell's "Uncharted" is really a code name for a new automobile, co-designed by Ed Begley Jr., that runs on one's own sense of self worth.
Reply

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 4:08PM Noesmano said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Nothing he says instills any confidence. He says he's played it, but the film he wants to make sounds nothing like our beloved action adventure games. It sounds more like he wants to make an action film and ride on the coat tails of an already established franchise.

Posted: Feb 21st 2011 6:17PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Noesmano

It sounds like he wants to make Blood Diamond, starring Marky Mark.

That'll be good, right?
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW