| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:08AM krisr2005 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Rovio is getting a little too cocky. They are attempting to ride the success of a single game, and they have yet to prove they can create something with the appeal of Angry Birds again.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:20AM the Peacemaker said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@krisr2005 I totally agree with you. The statements the company is making about retail games and now this...
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:14AM Kirkpad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Subtle money signs on the eyes. Nice.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:19AM brightbonewhite said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree that angry birds is a one hit wonder for Rovio. It remains to be seen if they can regularly dish out quality games, rather than just new levels of stacked wood and stone to knock over with birds...

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:22AM F1shBone said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ha!

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:23AM kbeehaze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't played this, but i''ve heard so much great things about it. I'll try it out afteri finish KZ3

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:23AM kbeehaze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
* I
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 1:07AM The Aquacharger said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@kbeehaze

Take the tank game from the Atari, or any flash game where you shoot stuff at a target over a distance to knock it down. That is Angry Birds.
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:27AM LaurenIsSoMosh said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
A few hours ago, I deleted a screenshot that I took of Angry Birds' reviews, thinking I'd never use it. I now regret that.

It was a picture of five one-star reviews in a row, after Rovio's latest and highly unpopular new update which now spams paying customers with Rovio "news" (read as: advertisements). There were actually seven one-star reviews in a row, but I could only fit five on the screen.

So, yeah. Now is probably the worst time for them to be getting big heads.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 6:01AM glassfin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@LaurenIsSoMosh

joikuspot does the same thing, spams paying customers with spam about new versions. so every time i put it on, i get a reminder that i should get a new symbian^3 version of it, the stupid ad-note doesn't even tell me which new features there are and doesn't have a "don't ever show me this again" button.

i think it's because these companies might be using the same consultants and rulebook for luring in more activity from existing users so that they can use that as a metric when talking to investors. it's friggin annoying. and they're all without imagination and if a competitor has done something that works nicely as justification for doing it themselfs(regardless of if the competitor was succesful or not).
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 12:37AM The Only Girl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow...he's gonna fall HARD.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 1:42AM MatthewMk2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Pachter saying something that's not completely insane? This is new.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 1:46AM The Aquacharger said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@MatthewMk2
It's still pretty obvious though.
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 1:47PM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@The Aquacharger
Pachter either says the completely obvious or the completely idotic. Seems to be his shtick.
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 2:12AM ouenwoof said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can understand why people like Angry Birds, but it's never done much for me. Almost all levels require a ridiculous level of blind-luck to do very well on, even when you get the basic strategy of each type of bird down.

If anything though, just because you're popular enough to get a film tie-in game (Angry Birds Rio), doesn't mean you're big enough to list yourself among several extremely high-profile game PUBLISHERS. Until they prove themselves with a track-record of successful releases, this is way too far in advance to be trying to do something like this.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 3:39AM soulseekerUK said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Greed i hope it chokes him...or why not do something to help others, why not donate some of that cash to help the suffering going on in the world right now..and save us all the pain of angry birds new skin.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 4:38AM TheE3Guy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How about they just take their $300mil and go their merry way?

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 4:45AM Tezz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheE3Guy Greed.
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 5:55AM glassfin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheE3Guy

do the riot thing? that's how this looks.

they got one arcade game concept and that's it. the running revenues don't justify the 40mil injection even, that was valued based on future earnings from the so called franchise. and what's worse, they seem to be stacking eggs into the angry bird basket. an IPO would be just a trap for goldrushing small investors, it's so expensive to do it that it makes no sense for the company of their size or for a company in their position and products, so the question would be what would they dump the IPO money into if they got it? and why? considering that they didn't need the money for creating angry birds in the first place and they have now enough money to produce a top pc-game(40 mil keeps a team of 20 or so going for a while, or maybe they're going to waste the money on balkan localisations and such, maybe an office in beijing..).
Reply

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 9:46AM Wintrale said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm glad people are finally realising how much of a fad Angry Birds is. It's not even a decent game and most of their "sales" are from people sitting on the loo bored. If they actually think even a tenth of their userbase is actually interested in Angry Birds, they're sorely overoptimistic - I still haven't beaten the first world and have no intention of ever playing it again. Too busy with real games, like P3P and Radiant Historia.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 10:39AM Nexum said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. Everybody recognizes that Rovio has made a very popular flash game for phones, but someone is getting a little too big for their britches.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 1:16PM Scotty96 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...Um...how is something worth that much that a majority of people have never or will never PAY for? On Android it's free with ads and quite frankly if they suddenly went to being a paid version, I wouldn't pay for it.

Same thing with Zynga, I played Farmville for a week, Mafia Wars for awhile, but I NEVER paid any real life money for anything?

It's like the South Park episode where they talk about "internet money"

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 3:38PM ND92 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rovio, I challenge you to repeat the success of Angry birds with something fresh.

Posted: Mar 22nd 2011 4:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Simple idea to reclaim their top spot. Pig Defense. Now you design the wooden, ice and steel towers to try to keep back the sharpshooting AI birds.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW